[bug-notifications] [gcc4core 0004955]: binutils build failed with checksum error.

[Mantis Bug Tracker]

The following issue requires your FEEDBACK. 
====================================================================== 
https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4955 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                tjyang
Assigned To:                maciej
====================================================================== 
Project:                    gcc4core
Issue ID:                   4955
Category:                   packaging
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   block
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     feedback
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2012-06-11 22:07 CEST
Last Modified:              2012-06-11 23:07 CEST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    binutils build failed with checksum error.
Description: 
please fix the checksum value in central repository. 
bash-3.00# svn info
Path: .
Working Copy Root Path: /root/opencsw
URL:
https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/binutils/trunk
Repository Root: https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar
Repository UUID: d3b55034-1cff-0310-a425-aefe953e1e90
Revision: 18330
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: dmichelsen
Last Changed Rev: 16916
Last Changed Date: 2012-01-26 07:25:13 -0600 (Thu, 26 Jan 2012)

bash-3.00#

cd /root/opencsw/binutils/trunk;mgar build
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0009918) maciej (manager) - 2012-06-11 23:07
 https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4955#c9918 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I checked this file:
http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/binutils-2.21.1.tar.bz2

And it indeed has a different checksum than the one from which we built the
packages.

bde820eac53fa3a8d8696667418557ad upstream at the moment
a22801a9cad45c85e9ff6afc10537d72 our archives

There are slight differences between the two files. In any case, I bumped
up the version to 2.22. I'll see if it builds if it does, I'll push it out
to unstable.