[bug-notifications] [openssh_client 0004991]: openssh_client only works on Solaris 10 Update 10 Kernel

[Mantis Bug Tracker]

The following issue has been CLOSED 
====================================================================== 
https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4991 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                jh
Assigned To:                yann
====================================================================== 
Project:                    openssh_client
Issue ID:                   4991
Category:                   regular use
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   high
Status:                     closed
Resolution:                 fixed
Fixed in Version:           
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2012-08-17 13:03 CEST
Last Modified:              2012-09-22 15:46 CEST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    openssh_client only works on Solaris 10 Update 10
Kernel
Description: 
Do to the update of the buildfarm and the rebuild of the package after that
it now needs libc.so.1 Version 1.22.7 which is introduced in Solaris 10
update 10.
Should be rebuild without those functions:
pvs -s /usr/lib/libc.so.1 |more

        SUNW_1.23:
        SUNW_1.22.7:
                vasprintf;
                smt_pause;
                fdatasync;
                asprintf;
        SUNW_1.22.6:
                utimensat;
                futimens;
        SUNW_1.22.5:
                getpagesizes2;

See
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/browser/csw/mgar/pkg/samba/trunk/Makefile#L326
how to do that

====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0010136) dam (administrator) - 2012-09-22 15:46
 https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4991#c10136 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I just wanted to set the "assigned" field to remember who fixed it as Jan
commented. I didn't intend to reopen it :-)