From maciej at opencsw.org Wed Dec 2 15:35:29 2009 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:35:29 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] Building postgresql-8.4.1 In-Reply-To: References: <21F5F93F-2F0E-47AF-8DAA-BE75885BE06A@opencsw.org> <988C113A-0FD5-4D91-B3DE-8174D2620B61@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Maciej, >> On build8s the tests pass just fine. ?Is it something that buildfarm >> admins can fix? > > Yes. I need to turn up SHMMAX on build8x and reboot. As I plan to migrate > that > on the VMware farm I can just install the new one for you to test. Please > allow > me some more time to finish it. Sure. Please let me know when it's done. I'll build the Intel architecture packages then. Meanwhile, I'd like to continue the 32/64 bit PostgreSQL discussion. My intuition is that application should run the native architecture binaries, unless there's a reason to do otherwise. Dago wrote, that it makes sense to do run 64-bit binaries (where possible) by default, when: > (1) using the proper width is mandatory (e.g. /dev/kmem access) > (2) using 64 bit always has an advantage > (3) there is difference in output between 32/64 bit I don't agree with the second point, because it's phrased too strongly. 64-bit will not always be advantageous, because you can find such data and such criteria that 32-bit binary will do better. I understand that for many applications there's no advantage in running in 64-bit width, and therefore the main policy is "use 32 bit only unless there are reasons to use 64-bit". In the case of a database engine, there is one general reason to use 64-bit width: databases tend to be big and run on big machines, using way more than just 2GB of RAM. Defaulting to 32-bit is like setting up a trap. I understand that the two main arguments against using 64-bit by default where possible are: - it consumes more memory - it potentially runs slower I've got a Netra T1125 2X 440MHZ to experiment with. I've run pgbench using sparcv8 and sparcv9 binaries. sparcv8 tps = 22.976848 (including connections establishing) tps = 23.070799 (excluding connections establishing) sparcv9: tps = 25.318832 (including connections establishing) tps = 25.481666 (excluding connections establishing) I also know that Dago didn't want to use isaexec, because somebody might want to copy raw data directories between 32- and 64-bit architecture machines. I agree that it might happen, but as far as my database experience goes, messing with raw data directories is generally asking for trouble. The way to get the data to or out of a database is via database dumps, which are architecture independent. If somebody wants replication, they should use slony. We could have a postinstall script which would detect and set the architecture, but isn't it what isaexec does anyway? One more thing: using isaexec doesn't take the choice away. The user can still set the path to the exact binary and run 32 or 64-bit version specifically, if they want to. To sum up: I maintain that it's best to: 1. Use native architecture width by default 2. Give the user the choice if they have a preference this or the other way isaexec does both those things. There's another way of doing it: Force the user to choose the architecture before they can run PostgreSQL at all. I think it would be a user-repellent policy. It's so much nicer when the package runs out of the box: pkgutil -y -i postgresql sudo -u postgres createuser joe createdb joe psql The negative impact of the database not working out of the box would in my opinion by greater than the positive impact of being always conscious about whether it's possible to copy the data files between machines with different bit width architectures. If people want to, I can draw another table with pros and cons. Maciej From dam at opencsw.org Thu Dec 3 23:13:18 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 23:13:18 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Update on buildfarm: Finished In-Reply-To: <68AA9784-2EE1-4CDC-9FCB-0A47424DADF4@opencsw.org> References: <68AA9784-2EE1-4CDC-9FCB-0A47424DADF4@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <853E9782-1424-4FFC-9592-A3A1B69BE9BA@opencsw.org> Hi, Am 03.12.2009 um 15:57 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen: > there is some progress on updating the buildfarm. The following tasks > have been finished: > > - HBA has been plugged in > - FC array has been set up and new zpool created for user homes > - LSI firmware has been updated > > Unfortunately, some tasks still run and will probably do so until > tomorrow: > > - Copying the user homes to the new zpool > - Updating Solaris to Solaris 10U8. > > After the machine has been rebooted when the above tasks have > finished I will also upgrade the firmware for LDom support to > finally install OpenSolaris Sparc at some later point. > > So enjoy one free evening or use build8s.go.opencsw.org instead ;-) - Firmware has been patched to support LDoms in the future - All Solaris 10 Sparc Zones are running U8 now with latest patchset - All user homes, mirrors and archives have been migrated from the internal disks to a SATA-FC-JBOD with ZFS freeing up space for the new control domain and OSOL LDom The farm should be fully functional again. Please keep your eyes open if you see anything unusual. Best regards -- Dago From maciej at opencsw.org Mon Dec 7 19:09:23 2009 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 18:09:23 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] pinentry on the buildfarm Message-ID: Pinentry has been released. Can you please install it on the builfarm so I can proceed with the dependent packages? From bwalton at opencsw.org Mon Dec 7 20:57:04 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:57:04 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] pinentry on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1260215816-sup-3997@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski's message of Mon Dec 07 13:09:23 -0500 2009: > Pinentry has been released. Can you please install it on the builfarm > so I can proceed with the dependent packages? Doing this now. -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From maciej at opencsw.org Tue Dec 8 21:40:00 2009 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 20:40:00 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] NSPR on the buildfarm Message-ID: Dear buildfarm admins, Can you install NSPR on the buildfarm? Once it's installed, I'll proceed with building NSS which depends on NSPR. Maciej From maciej at opencsw.org Tue Dec 8 21:40:54 2009 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 20:40:54 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] NSPR on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski wrote: > Dear buildfarm admins, > > Can you install NSPR on the buildfarm? ?Once it's installed, I'll > proceed with building NSS which depends on NSPR. It's two packages: nspr and nspr_devel. From bwalton at opencsw.org Tue Dec 8 21:45:31 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:45:31 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] NSPR on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1260305117-sup-7284@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski's message of Tue Dec 08 15:40:54 -0500 2009: > It's two packages: nspr and nspr_devel. Doing these now. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bwalton at opencsw.org Thu Dec 10 01:14:25 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:14:25 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] perl maintenance Message-ID: <1260404018-sup-4930@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> I'm removing CSWperldoc and then downgrading CSWperl to the previous stable release. Peter is unable to build the new perl with the wonky makemaker/installer module. -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rupert at opencsw.org Tue Dec 15 19:31:25 2009 From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:31:25 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: [csw-maintainers] trac-0.11.6 upgrade, CSWgenshi not found? In-Reply-To: References: <6af4270912150910l179db3b7r4e93f812513703d3@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <6af4270912151031p47bed4cud942d577372781c7@mail.gmail.com> could you pls instal genshi? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski Date: Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 19:00 Subject: Re: [csw-maintainers] trac-0.11.6 upgrade, CSWgenshi not found? To: List for OpenCSW maintainers On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:10 PM, rupert THURNER wrote: > where this could come from? i checked it in as well, so it should be easier > to reproduce. Ask buildfarm@ to install the CSWgenshi package for you. (assuming it's been released) _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list maintainers at lists.opencsw.org https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bwalton at opencsw.org Tue Dec 15 19:37:23 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:37:23 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: [csw-maintainers] trac-0.11.6 upgrade, CSWgenshi not found? In-Reply-To: <6af4270912151031p47bed4cud942d577372781c7@mail.gmail.com> References: <6af4270912150910l179db3b7r4e93f812513703d3@mail.gmail.com> <6af4270912151031p47bed4cud942d577372781c7@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1260902223-sup-1443@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from rupert THURNER's message of Tue Dec 15 13:31:25 -0500 2009: > could you pls instal genshi? Doing this now. -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From maciej at opencsw.org Wed Dec 16 14:43:49 2009 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:43:49 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] CSWtree on the login host In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Can you install CSWtree on the login host? Maciej From blizinski at google.com Wed Dec 16 14:42:28 2009 From: blizinski at google.com (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:42:28 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] CSWtree on the login host Message-ID: Can you install CSWtree on the login host? Maciej From bonivart at opencsw.org Thu Dec 17 16:04:01 2009 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:04:01 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Could perl be downgraded? Message-ID: <625385e30912170704o60d2525bn837523bf961a8101@mail.gmail.com> I would like perl-5.8.8,REV=2009.08.17 to be reinstalled on the build servers. The current one (5.8.8,REV=2009.11.12) has an issue that keeps me from updating other perl based packages. -- /peter From dam at opencsw.org Thu Dec 17 16:09:54 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:09:54 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] CSWtree on the login host In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <93010645-44AD-4C4A-A1E1-EB16AB2705B9@opencsw.org> Hi Maciej, Am 16.12.2009 um 14:42 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > Can you install CSWtree on the login host? Done. Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Thu Dec 17 16:10:19 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:10:19 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Could perl be downgraded? In-Reply-To: <625385e30912170704o60d2525bn837523bf961a8101@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e30912170704o60d2525bn837523bf961a8101@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1BAD5B14-5482-4C0C-9B61-ECE16315DBB6@opencsw.org> Hi, Am 17.12.2009 um 16:04 schrieb Peter Bonivart: > I would like perl-5.8.8,REV=2009.08.17 to be reinstalled on the build > servers. The current one (5.8.8,REV=2009.11.12) has an issue that > keeps me from updating other perl based packages. Doing this now. Best regards -- Dago From bwalton at opencsw.org Thu Dec 17 16:33:52 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:33:52 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Could perl be downgraded? In-Reply-To: <1BAD5B14-5482-4C0C-9B61-ECE16315DBB6@opencsw.org> References: <625385e30912170704o60d2525bn837523bf961a8101@mail.gmail.com> <1BAD5B14-5482-4C0C-9B61-ECE16315DBB6@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <1261063857-sup-4388@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Dagobert Michelsen's message of Thu Dec 17 10:10:19 -0500 2009: > Doing this now. Can we also as buildfarm admins agree to use only pkgutil. This will allow leveraging the new feature whereby we can add CSWperl to the 'ignore' list so it doesn't get inadvertently updated again? Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dam at opencsw.org Thu Dec 17 16:38:26 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:38:26 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Could perl be downgraded? In-Reply-To: <1261063857-sup-4388@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <625385e30912170704o60d2525bn837523bf961a8101@mail.gmail.com> <1BAD5B14-5482-4C0C-9B61-ECE16315DBB6@opencsw.org> <1261063857-sup-4388@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <89E10DE2-DC7A-4246-9AE1-B2BEF3F90B64@opencsw.org> Hi Ben, Am 17.12.2009 um 16:33 schrieb Ben Walton: > Excerpts from Dagobert Michelsen's message of Thu Dec 17 10:10:19 > -0500 2009: > >> Doing this now. > > Can we also as buildfarm admins agree to use only pkgutil. This will > allow leveraging the new feature whereby we can add CSWperl to the > 'ignore' list so it doesn't get inadvertently updated again? Ok. Best regards -- Dago From glaw at opencsw.org Fri Dec 18 11:12:54 2009 From: glaw at opencsw.org (Gary Law) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:12:54 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] access to Sun Global Desktop Message-ID: First, thanks to whoever installed this awesome tool. Second, could you allow me access? username glaw, I'll need a new password set. Thanks Gary -- glaw at opencsw.org From rupert at opencsw.org Sat Dec 19 00:48:45 2009 From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:48:45 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: [trac 0004086]: Change the dependency from CSWpysvn to CSWpythonsvn In-Reply-To: <3068f0014bbd4b66cb033ea9c6d97d00@www.opencsw.org> References: <3068f0014bbd4b66cb033ea9c6d97d00@www.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <6af4270912181548y3e872753h294f45dada7494fa@mail.gmail.com> could you please install CSWpythonsvn on the buildfarm as well? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mantis Bug Tracker Date: Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 20:59 Subject: [trac 0004086]: Change the dependency from CSWpysvn to CSWpythonsvn To: rupert at opencsw.org The following issue has been SUBMITTED. ====================================================================== http://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4086 ====================================================================== Reported By: maciej Assigned To: ====================================================================== Project: trac Issue ID: 4086 Category: packaging Reproducibility: always Severity: major Priority: normal Status: new ====================================================================== Date Submitted: 2009-12-18 20:59 CET Last Modified: 2009-12-18 20:59 CET ====================================================================== Summary: Change the dependency from CSWpysvn to CSWpythonsvn Description: The old pysvn package will now contain a new module. What was previously pysvn is now pythonsvn. ====================================================================== -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bwalton at opencsw.org Sat Dec 19 01:29:40 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:29:40 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: [trac 0004086]: Change the dependency from CSWpysvn to CSWpythonsvn In-Reply-To: <6af4270912181548y3e872753h294f45dada7494fa@mail.gmail.com> References: <3068f0014bbd4b66cb033ea9c6d97d00@www.opencsw.org> <6af4270912181548y3e872753h294f45dada7494fa@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1261182567-sup-6580@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from rupert THURNER's message of Fri Dec 18 18:48:45 -0500 2009: > could you please install CSWpythonsvn on the buildfarm as well? Doing this now. -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bwalton at opencsw.org Sat Dec 19 01:49:44 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:49:44 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] CSWperl exclude Message-ID: <1261183701-sup-7776@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> I'm in the process of excluding CSWperl from further pkgutil updates on the buildfarm. I got bitten again just now. When Peter has updated perl to 5.10.x, we'll need to drop this exclusion again. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From hson at opencsw.org Sun Dec 20 16:53:23 2009 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 16:53:23 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Out of swap space on build8x Message-ID: <4B2E4873.6040003@opencsw.org> I keep getting "ube: error: Cannot exec '/opt/studio/SOS11/SUNWspro/prod/bin/fbe' : Not enough space" on build8x and there isn't that much free swap space left. Maybe someone could move /tmp/mbuffer-20091122 and /tmp/doxygen-apptrace out of the way so 400+MB would become free From dam at opencsw.org Sun Dec 20 17:04:40 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:04:40 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Out of swap space on build8x In-Reply-To: <4B2E4873.6040003@opencsw.org> References: <4B2E4873.6040003@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Roger, Am 20.12.2009 um 16:53 schrieb Roger H?kansson: > I keep getting "ube: error: Cannot exec '/opt/studio/SOS11/SUNWspro/prod/bin/fbe' : Not enough space" on build8x and there isn't that much free swap space left. > Maybe someone could move /tmp/mbuffer-20091122 and /tmp/doxygen-apptrace out of the way so 400+MB would become free Done. To other maintainers: - Please use your homedirectory for specific stuff. As ZIL flushing is turned off it is as fast as writing to /tmp. - There is now also current8x/9x/10x. Please give them a try. Bets regards -- Dago From maciej at opencsw.org Mon Dec 21 16:10:19 2009 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:10:19 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] pm_x11protocol on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Can you install it? From dam at opencsw.org Mon Dec 21 16:18:37 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:18:37 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] pm_x11protocol on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Maciej, Am 21.12.2009 um 16:10 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > pm_x11protocol on the buildfarm > Can you install it? Doing this now. Best regards -- Dago From bwalton at opencsw.org Mon Dec 21 16:21:11 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:21:11 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Out of swap space on build8x In-Reply-To: References: <4B2E4873.6040003@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <1261408745-sup-6269@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Dagobert Michelsen's message of Sun Dec 20 11:04:40 -0500 2009: > Done. To other maintainers: > - Please use your homedirectory for specific stuff. As ZIL flushing > is turned off it is as fast as writing to /tmp. Sorry, I may have left some junk in /tmp on build8x. I'm investigating a behaviour discrepancy in coreutils that shows up when used in /tmp but not in my ~/. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. From dam at opencsw.org Mon Dec 21 16:27:12 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:27:12 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Downrevving Perl again :-P Message-ID: Downrevving Perl again now :-P Best regards -- Dago From blizinski at google.com Mon Dec 21 16:09:45 2009 From: blizinski at google.com (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:09:45 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] pm_x11protocol on the buildfarm Message-ID: Can you install it? From maciej at opencsw.org Mon Dec 21 21:25:56 2009 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:25:56 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] NSPR on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski > wrote: >> Dear buildfarm admins, >> >> Can you install NSPR on the buildfarm? ?Once it's installed, I'll >> proceed with building NSS which depends on NSPR. > > It's two packages: nspr and nspr_devel. I looked at current8x, it didn't have the NSPR package. From bwalton at opencsw.org Tue Dec 22 00:34:42 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:34:42 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] NSPR on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1261438408-sup-5821@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski's message of Mon Dec 21 15:25:56 -0500 2009: > > It's two packages: nspr and nspr_devel. > > I looked at current8x, it didn't have the NSPR package. I'm sorry. I've only been doing build* for requests to buildfarm. I can include current* from now on. I'll tend to this shortly...I've only got a few minutes before I need to have to overtired tots in the tub. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bwalton at opencsw.org Tue Dec 22 02:47:10 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:47:10 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] NSPR on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: <1261438408-sup-5821@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <1261438408-sup-5821@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <1261446383-sup-9502@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Ben Walton's message of Mon Dec 21 18:34:42 -0500 2009: Hi Dago, > I'm sorry. I've only been doing build* for requests to buildfarm. I > can include current* from now on. Can you add my sudo rights on current* where currentX != buildX? Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From skayser at opencsw.org Tue Dec 22 09:24:53 2009 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:24:53 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] IPv6 loopback interfaces? (was Re: [csw-maintainers] apr-1.3.9 - test failure ?) In-Reply-To: <4B30818F.7030809@opencsw.org> References: <6af4270912191739n67f31117pd5b526dfbb163de3@mail.gmail.com> <4B2E570A.3080708@opencsw.org> <6af4270912211504r43f65310t86e00fa22570716e@mail.gmail.com> <4B3001B8.9060408@opencsw.org> <6af4270912211627m3e49bc36mbf44ae6a2a4bcb52@mail.gmail.com> <4B30818F.7030809@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <4B308255.1020706@opencsw.org> Forgot to CC the original mail. Would it be possible to configure an IPv6 address for the loopback interfaces on the build boxes? This would make the apr test suite pass. Sebastian Kayser wrote on 22.12.2009 09:21: > rupert THURNER wrote on 22.12.2009 01:27: >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 00:16, Sebastian Kayser wrote: >>> rupert THURNER wrote on 22.12.2009 00:04: >>>> i commented the tests for the moment, the test code does ipv6. >>> glad it helped! There was a similar problem with mbuffer, which also >>> does IPv6 tests. Instead of completely disabling the test suite, it was >>> possible to only skip the IPv6 test. This way one is still alerted (and >>> I already was) if anything else goes wrong. Might be wise to take the >>> same route for apr for future builds. Do any other tests fail right now? >>> >> no. i did not find any log file but looked into the code. i do not >> understand what they really try to do ... but i'd saythe test suite >> should not test things which are known not to work. > > Regarding the test suite: There is a bug report about the IPv6 testing > problem [1] where the bug reporter would also like to see the IPv6 tests > being skipped rather than failed for boxes without IPv6 interfaces. The > apr guys take a different stance. > > Luckily, a configured IPv6 loopback interface is sufficient. @Buildfarm > admins: would it be possible to configure IPv6 loopback interfaces for > the buildfarm boxes? > > # ifconfig lo0 inet6 plumb > # ifconfig lo0 inet6 ::1 up > # touch /etc/hostname6.lo0 > >> the code contains: >> #if APR_HAVE_IPV6 >> static void tcp6_socket(abts_case *tc, void *data) >> >> and the config log says: >> configure:34230: checking if APR supports IPv6 >> configure:34232: result: yes > > That's something different. ./configure detects general IPv6 support in > the OS and it's libraries and thus build apr with IPv6 support. It is > perfectly fine to build apr with IPv6 support - even if the particular > build box doesn't have a configured IPv6 interface. This way we end up > with an apr package that our users can use, even when they are running > it in a configured IPv6 environment. > > Sebastian > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45494 > _______________________________________________ > maintainers mailing list > maintainers at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers From dam at opencsw.org Tue Dec 22 11:58:19 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:58:19 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] pm_x11protocol on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9AFE64BC-C6D2-46DE-8BFA-70623ECA8AF2@opencsw.org> Hi, Am 21.12.2009 um 16:09 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > Can you install it? Doing this now. Best regrads -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Tue Dec 22 14:41:00 2009 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:41:00 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] NSPR on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: <1261446383-sup-9502@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <1261438408-sup-5821@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> <1261446383-sup-9502@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: Hi Ben, Am 22.12.2009 um 02:47 schrieb Ben Walton: > Excerpts from Ben Walton's message of Mon Dec 21 18:34:42 -0500 2009: >> I'm sorry. I've only been doing build* for requests to buildfarm. I >> can include current* from now on. > > Can you add my sudo rights on current* where currentX != buildX? Done, please verify. Best regards -- Dago From maciej at opencsw.org Sun Dec 27 01:38:32 2009 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 00:38:32 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] pysvn, py_cheetah on the buildfarm Message-ID: Dear buildfarm admins, can you please install pysvn and py_cheetah on the buildfarm and on the login host? Maciej From ihsan at opencsw.org Sun Dec 27 16:41:59 2009 From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 16:41:59 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] gmake: warning: Clock skew detected. Your build may be incomplete. In-Reply-To: <4B047CB6.5050007@opencsw.org> References: <4B047CB6.5050007@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <4B378047.6020703@opencsw.org> Am 19.11.09 00:01, schrieb Sebastian Kayser: > I am working on build8x and build8s mostly and lately there seems to > be a time keeping issue. At least i am seeing lots of messages > like the following > > ... > gmake: Warning: File `work/solaris8-i386/cookies/global' has modification time 3.3 s in the future > ... > gmake: warning: Clock skew detected. Your build may be incomplete. > ... > > Looking at the systems, it seems as if the build.s are in sync, whereas > the build.x boxes have different notions of "the current time". Could > someone please have a look at it? tools.syncTime = "TRUE" should fix this issue. Ihsan -- ihsan at dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/ From bwalton at opencsw.org Tue Dec 29 15:56:37 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 09:56:37 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] pysvn, py_cheetah on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1262098519-sup-2573@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski's message of Sat Dec 26 19:38:32 -0500 2009: Hi Maciej, > Dear buildfarm admins, can you please install pysvn and py_cheetah on > the buildfarm and on the login host? Does pysvn have files that conflict with pythonsvn still? When I installed pythonsvn at Rupert's request, I removed pysvn since they shipped identically named files. If there are still conflicts, is there a way to resolve that nicely? Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From maciej at opencsw.org Tue Dec 29 16:41:08 2009 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:41:08 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] pysvn, py_cheetah on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: <1262098519-sup-2573@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <1262098519-sup-2573@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Ben Walton wrote: > Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski's message of Sat Dec 26 19:38:32 -0500 2009: > > Hi Maciej, > >> Dear buildfarm admins, can you please install pysvn and py_cheetah on >> the buildfarm and on the login host? > > Does pysvn have files that conflict with pythonsvn still? ?When I > installed pythonsvn at Rupert's request, I removed pysvn since they > shipped identically named files. ?If there are still conflicts, is > there a way to resolve that nicely? There's no file overlap between pysvn and pythonsvn any more. The issue has been resolved, CSWpysvn now contains code with the pysvn project. Maciej From bwalton at opencsw.org Tue Dec 29 21:05:28 2009 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:05:28 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] pysvn, py_cheetah on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: <1262098519-sup-2573@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <1262117096-sup-2808@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski's message of Tue Dec 29 10:41:08 -0500 2009: > There's no file overlap between pysvn and pythonsvn any more. The > issue has been resolved, CSWpysvn now contains code with the pysvn > project. Perfect. I'll push your requested packages onto the build boxes shortly. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: