From gadavis at opencsw.org Fri Dec 3 01:08:05 2010 From: gadavis at opencsw.org (Geoff Davis) Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 16:08:05 -0800 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Clock is off by an hour on build10x Message-ID: The clock on build10x is off by an hour compared to the other systems in the build farm. From gadavis at opencsw.org Fri Dec 3 02:25:56 2010 From: gadavis at opencsw.org (Geoff Davis) Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 17:25:56 -0800 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] gfortran binary on build9x is wrong Message-ID: <419076FB-AF7B-40E8-86E1-B9CC769AED22@opencsw.org> Hi all, build9x is doing some weird stuff with it's gfortran binary. It looks like it is still the binary from the obsolete CSWgcc4g95 package rather than the new one from CSWgcc4gfortran I say this because when I run gfortran -v on build9x, I get version 4.02: $ /opt/csw/gcc4/bin/gfortran -v Using built-in specs. Target: i386-pc-solaris2.8 Configured with: ../sources/gcc-4.0.2/configure --prefix=/opt/csw/gcc4 --with-local-prefix=/opt/csw --with-gnu-as --with-as=/opt/csw/bin/gas --without-gnu-ld --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --enable-threads=posix --enable-shared --enable-multilib --enable-nls --with-included-gettext --with-libiconv-prefix=/opt/csw --with-x --enable-java-awt=xlib --with-system-zlib --enable-languages=c,c++,f95,java,objc,ada Thread model: posix gcc version 4.0.2 Same command on build9s results in version 4.3.3: $ /opt/csw/gcc4/bin/gfortran -v Using built-in specs. Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Configured with: ../gcc-4.3.3/configure --prefix=/opt/csw/gcc4 --exec-prefix=/opt/csw/gcc4 --with-gnu-as --with-as=/opt/csw/bin/gas --without-gnu-ld --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --enable-nls --with-included-gettext --with-libiconv-prefix=/opt/csw --with-x --with-mpfr=/opt/csw --with-gmp=/opt/csw --enable-java-awt=xlib --enable-libada --enable-libssp --enable-objc-gc --enable-threads=posix --enable-stage1-languages=c --enable-languages=ada,c,c++,fortran,java,objc Thread model: posix gcc version 4.3.3 (GCC) The version number of the old CSWgcc4g95 package is 4.0.2, while the rest of the gcc4 suite is 4.3.3 The odd part is that CSWgcc4g95 does not appear to be installed on build9x: $ pkginfo | grep CSWgcc4 application CSWgcc4core gcc4core - GNU C Compiler application CSWgcc4corert gcc4corert - GNU C Compiler Run Time application CSWgcc4g++ gcc4g++ - GNU C++ Compiler application CSWgcc4g++rt gcc4g++rt - GNU C++ Compiler Run Time application CSWgcc4gfortran gcc4gfortran - GNU Fortran Compiler application CSWgcc4gfortranrt gcc4gfortranrt - GNU Fortran Compiler Run Time The installed CSWgcc4gfortran shows that it's the right version: $ pkginfo -l CSWgcc4gfortran | grep VERSION VERSION: 4.3.3,REV=2009.05.07 So I can't tell if this is a packaging problem with CSWgcc4gfortran on x86 or if this binary is a hanger-on from the old CSWgcc4g95 that didn't get removed properly. Can someone on the build farm try to remove and reinstall CSWgcc4gfortran and CSWgcc4gfortranrt to see if this problem clears itself up? Thanks, Geoff From bwalton at opencsw.org Fri Dec 3 02:38:18 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 20:38:18 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] gfortran binary on build9x is wrong In-Reply-To: <419076FB-AF7B-40E8-86E1-B9CC769AED22@opencsw.org> References: <419076FB-AF7B-40E8-86E1-B9CC769AED22@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <1291340251-sup-5505@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Geoff Davis's message of Thu Dec 02 20:25:56 -0500 2010: Hi Geoff, > Can someone on the build farm try to remove and reinstall > CSWgcc4gfortran and CSWgcc4gfortranrt to see if this problem clears > itself up? I'll remove these both and then reinstall. I see the same results as you presently and I'll compare the after state before following up. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From bwalton at opencsw.org Fri Dec 3 02:49:46 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 20:49:46 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] gfortran binary on build9x is wrong In-Reply-To: <1291340251-sup-5505@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <419076FB-AF7B-40E8-86E1-B9CC769AED22@opencsw.org> <1291340251-sup-5505@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <1291340947-sup-9402@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Ben Walton's message of Thu Dec 02 20:38:18 -0500 2010: > I'll remove these both and then reinstall. I see the same results as > you presently and I'll compare the after state before following up. The reinstall fixed the issue. I'm also removing the packages on testing9x and testing10x. They're not on the corresponding s boxes, so until someone needs them... Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From rupert.thurner at gmail.com Sat Dec 4 21:40:01 2010 From: rupert.thurner at gmail.com (rupert THURNER) Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 21:40:01 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] gstreamerplugins_bad Message-ID: hi, because it references an old neon library, i tried to recompile gstreamerplugins_bad, and got ==> Verifying installed package CSWfaac: MISSING could you please install it? ruper.t -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dam at opencsw.org Sat Dec 4 23:32:45 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 23:32:45 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] gstreamerplugins_bad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4C746170-0618-460E-BDAB-178ADD371BBB@opencsw.org> Hi, Am 04.12.2010 um 21:40 schrieb rupert THURNER: > hi, because it references an old neon library, i tried to recompile gstreamerplugins_bad, and got > > ==> Verifying installed package CSWfaac: MISSING > > could you please install it? Doing this now. Best regards -- Dago From maciej at opencsw.org Sun Dec 5 23:46:28 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 22:46:28 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] checkpkg.ini Message-ID: Dear buildfarm admins, could you please place checkpkg.ini in /etc/opt/csw? The original is in ~maciej/.checkpkg/checkpkg.ini Please make it 0640 with a group that maintainers can read, owned by me. I would like write access to that file in case I need to change the database everyone is using, which might be convenient when doing things such as schema changes. Maciej From bwalton at opencsw.org Mon Dec 6 00:39:41 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 18:39:41 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] checkpkg.ini In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1291592369-sup-5563@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski's message of Sun Dec 05 17:46:28 -0500 2010: > Dear buildfarm admins, could you please place checkpkg.ini in /etc/opt/csw? > > The original is in ~maciej/.checkpkg/checkpkg.ini Done. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From maciej at opencsw.org Mon Dec 13 15:04:00 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:04:00 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Refreshing the checkpkg database Message-ID: Hello buildfarm admins, Recent checkpkg update slightly increases the amount of maintenance on the buildfarm. Apart from refreshing packages on the buildfarm, we also have to refresh the database. It's documented on the wiki page: http://wiki.opencsw.org/checkpkg#toc3 I guess we need a cron job to run the refreshes, say, once a day, and send notifications if there are any failures. Refreshes can be run from any host that has access to the mirror via a filesystem. Can you set up a refresh cron job? Maciej From mark at probably.co.uk Tue Dec 14 12:11:02 2010 From: mark at probably.co.uk (Mark Phillips) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:11:02 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Additional maintainer for CSWfacter and CSWpuppet Message-ID: <96E261E2-D303-4A2A-8607-0A1C2337E344@probably.co.uk> Hi, Could I get a maintainer account for CSW please? I've co-maintained with Gary Law, in the background, CSWfacter and CSWpuppet, for some time. At the moment Gary is too busy to look after the packages, and I've been producing newer versions - that work as CSW packages - and publishing on my blog. I'd like to be able to get them more up to date in CSW please. Many thanks, --Mark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dam at opencsw.org Tue Dec 14 12:15:14 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:15:14 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Additional maintainer for CSWfacter and CSWpuppet In-Reply-To: <96E261E2-D303-4A2A-8607-0A1C2337E344@probably.co.uk> References: <96E261E2-D303-4A2A-8607-0A1C2337E344@probably.co.uk> Message-ID: <86E7FC09-AAEF-4EE8-BD65-8ED8D65852DF@opencsw.org> Hi Mark, Am 14.12.2010 um 12:11 schrieb Mark Phillips: > Could I get a maintainer account for CSW please? I've co-maintained with Gary Law, in the background, CSWfacter and CSWpuppet, for some time. At the moment Gary is too busy to look after the packages, and I've been producing newer versions - that work as CSW packages - and publishing on my blog. > > I'd like to be able to get them more up to date in CSW please. Cool. Do you mean a standard buildfarm account or a maintainer- account capable of releasing packages? For the latter case I cc'ed board@ which does the acceptance for those. Best regards -- Dago -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mark at probably.co.uk Tue Dec 14 13:42:33 2010 From: mark at probably.co.uk (Mark Phillips) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:42:33 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Additional maintainer for CSWfacter and CSWpuppet In-Reply-To: <86E7FC09-AAEF-4EE8-BD65-8ED8D65852DF@opencsw.org> References: <96E261E2-D303-4A2A-8607-0A1C2337E344@probably.co.uk> <86E7FC09-AAEF-4EE8-BD65-8ED8D65852DF@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <363BEA71-64E1-4C9E-95E4-BE7523EF9089@probably.co.uk> On 14 Dec 2010, at 11:15, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Am 14.12.2010 um 12:11 schrieb Mark Phillips: >> Could I get a maintainer account for CSW please? I've co-maintained with Gary Law, in the background, CSWfacter and CSWpuppet, for some time. At the moment Gary is too busy to look after the packages, and I've been producing newer versions - that work as CSW packages - and publishing on my blog. >> >> I'd like to be able to get them more up to date in CSW please. > > Cool. Do you mean a standard buildfarm account or a maintainer- > account capable of releasing packages? For the latter case I > cc'ed board@ which does the acceptance for those. I think I mean the latter Dago - but if I can get a buildfarm account to test my recent builds please, that would be ace too. Regards, --Mark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dam at opencsw.org Wed Dec 15 14:19:52 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:19:52 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Additional maintainer for CSWfacter and CSWpuppet In-Reply-To: <363BEA71-64E1-4C9E-95E4-BE7523EF9089@probably.co.uk> References: <96E261E2-D303-4A2A-8607-0A1C2337E344@probably.co.uk> <86E7FC09-AAEF-4EE8-BD65-8ED8D65852DF@opencsw.org> <363BEA71-64E1-4C9E-95E4-BE7523EF9089@probably.co.uk> Message-ID: Hi Mark, Am 14.12.2010 um 13:42 schrieb Mark Phillips: > On 14 Dec 2010, at 11:15, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Am 14.12.2010 um 12:11 schrieb Mark Phillips: >>> Could I get a maintainer account for CSW please? I've co-maintained with Gary Law, in the background, CSWfacter and CSWpuppet, for some time. At the moment Gary is too busy to look after the packages, and I've been producing newer versions - that work as CSW packages - and publishing on my blog. >>> >>> I'd like to be able to get them more up to date in CSW please. >> >> Cool. Do you mean a standard buildfarm account or a maintainer- >> account capable of releasing packages? For the latter case I >> cc'ed board@ which does the acceptance for those. > > I think I mean the latter Dago - but if I can get a buildfarm account to test my recent builds please, that would be ace too. AFAIK Phil is reactivating your old informations in the database. Best regards -- Dago -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From phil at bolthole.com Wed Dec 15 18:23:19 2010 From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 09:23:19 -0800 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Additional maintainer for CSWfacter and CSWpuppet In-Reply-To: References: <96E261E2-D303-4A2A-8607-0A1C2337E344@probably.co.uk> <86E7FC09-AAEF-4EE8-BD65-8ED8D65852DF@opencsw.org> <363BEA71-64E1-4C9E-95E4-BE7523EF9089@probably.co.uk> Message-ID: On 12/15/10, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > > AFAIK Phil is reactivating your old informations in the database. > But we dont have "a" database for logins -- so this is a reminder that I'm leaving it up to you buildfarm admins to (re) activate "markp" on buildfarm. From mark at probably.co.uk Wed Dec 15 19:47:21 2010 From: mark at probably.co.uk (Mark Phillips) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:47:21 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Additional maintainer for CSWfacter and CSWpuppet In-Reply-To: References: <96E261E2-D303-4A2A-8607-0A1C2337E344@probably.co.uk> <86E7FC09-AAEF-4EE8-BD65-8ED8D65852DF@opencsw.org> <363BEA71-64E1-4C9E-95E4-BE7523EF9089@probably.co.uk> Message-ID: <76DFA7B0-5EE8-4207-A21B-B6712E913CEE@probably.co.uk> On 15 Dec 2010, at 17:23, Philip Brown wrote: > On 12/15/10, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> >> AFAIK Phil is reactivating your old informations in the database. >> > > But we dont have "a" database for logins -- so this is a reminder that > I'm leaving it up to you buildfarm admins to (re) activate "markp" on > buildfarm. Thank you gentlemen. Just let me know when it's ready to test and I'll give it a whirl. Cheers, --Mark From dam at opencsw.org Wed Dec 15 21:31:29 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 21:31:29 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Additional maintainer for CSWfacter and CSWpuppet In-Reply-To: <76DFA7B0-5EE8-4207-A21B-B6712E913CEE@probably.co.uk> References: <96E261E2-D303-4A2A-8607-0A1C2337E344@probably.co.uk> <86E7FC09-AAEF-4EE8-BD65-8ED8D65852DF@opencsw.org> <363BEA71-64E1-4C9E-95E4-BE7523EF9089@probably.co.uk> <76DFA7B0-5EE8-4207-A21B-B6712E913CEE@probably.co.uk> Message-ID: <4B8C69DC-E85A-4774-A6BE-7F1B34DA69BA@opencsw.org> Hi Mark, Am 15.12.2010 um 19:47 schrieb Mark Phillips: > On 15 Dec 2010, at 17:23, Philip Brown wrote: >> On 12/15/10, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >>> AFAIK Phil is reactivating your old informations in the database. >> >> But we dont have "a" database for logins -- so this is a reminder that >> I'm leaving it up to you buildfarm admins to (re) activate "markp" on >> buildfarm. > > Thank you gentlemen. Just let me know when it's ready to test and I'll give it a whirl. Ok. Mark: I need your ssh public key for buildfarm access. Best regards -- Dago From mark at probably.co.uk Wed Dec 15 22:05:09 2010 From: mark at probably.co.uk (Mark Phillips) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 21:05:09 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Additional maintainer for CSWfacter and CSWpuppet In-Reply-To: <4B8C69DC-E85A-4774-A6BE-7F1B34DA69BA@opencsw.org> References: <96E261E2-D303-4A2A-8607-0A1C2337E344@probably.co.uk> <86E7FC09-AAEF-4EE8-BD65-8ED8D65852DF@opencsw.org> <363BEA71-64E1-4C9E-95E4-BE7523EF9089@probably.co.uk> <76DFA7B0-5EE8-4207-A21B-B6712E913CEE@probably.co.uk> <4B8C69DC-E85A-4774-A6BE-7F1B34DA69BA@opencsw.org> Message-ID: On 15 Dec 2010, at 20:31, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Am 15.12.2010 um 19:47 schrieb Mark Phillips: >> On 15 Dec 2010, at 17:23, Philip Brown wrote: >>> On 12/15/10, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >>>> AFAIK Phil is reactivating your old informations in the database. >>> >>> But we dont have "a" database for logins -- so this is a reminder that >>> I'm leaving it up to you buildfarm admins to (re) activate "markp" on >>> buildfarm. >> >> Thank you gentlemen. Just let me know when it's ready to test and I'll give it a whirl. > > Ok. Mark: I need your ssh public key for buildfarm access. Use this one please Dago? ssh-dss 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 markp at anywhere Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dam at opencsw.org Wed Dec 15 22:57:42 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:57:42 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Additional maintainer for CSWfacter and CSWpuppet In-Reply-To: References: <96E261E2-D303-4A2A-8607-0A1C2337E344@probably.co.uk> <86E7FC09-AAEF-4EE8-BD65-8ED8D65852DF@opencsw.org> <363BEA71-64E1-4C9E-95E4-BE7523EF9089@probably.co.uk> <76DFA7B0-5EE8-4207-A21B-B6712E913CEE@probably.co.uk> <4B8C69DC-E85A-4774-A6BE-7F1B34DA69BA@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Mark, Am 15.12.2010 um 22:05 schrieb Mark Phillips: > On 15 Dec 2010, at 20:31, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Am 15.12.2010 um 19:47 schrieb Mark Phillips: >>> On 15 Dec 2010, at 17:23, Philip Brown wrote: >>>> On 12/15/10, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >>>>> AFAIK Phil is reactivating your old informations in the database. >>>> >>>> But we dont have "a" database for logins -- so this is a reminder that >>>> I'm leaving it up to you buildfarm admins to (re) activate "markp" on >>>> buildfarm. >>> >>> Thank you gentlemen. Just let me know when it's ready to test and I'll give it a whirl. >> >> Ok. Mark: I need your ssh public key for buildfarm access. > > Use this one please Dago? You should be able to login now with ssh markp at login.opencsw.org Please make sure to read /etc/SETUP. Just let me know if you need anything else. Best regards -- Dago -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mark at probably.co.uk Thu Dec 16 12:13:07 2010 From: mark at probably.co.uk (Mark Phillips) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:13:07 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Additional maintainer for CSWfacter and CSWpuppet In-Reply-To: References: <96E261E2-D303-4A2A-8607-0A1C2337E344@probably.co.uk> <86E7FC09-AAEF-4EE8-BD65-8ED8D65852DF@opencsw.org> <363BEA71-64E1-4C9E-95E4-BE7523EF9089@probably.co.uk> <76DFA7B0-5EE8-4207-A21B-B6712E913CEE@probably.co.uk> <4B8C69DC-E85A-4774-A6BE-7F1B34DA69BA@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <4829B482-D746-4335-AE5B-5ADBD3BC8B23@probably.co.uk> On 15 Dec 2010, at 21:57, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > You should be able to login now with > ssh markp at login.opencsw.org > > Please make sure to read /etc/SETUP. Just let me know if you need anything else. Hi Dago, Yup, that works fine. Many thanks, --Mark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bwalton at opencsw.org Thu Dec 16 21:01:25 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:01:25 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Refreshing the checkpkg database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1292529639-sup-1047@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski's message of Mon Dec 13 09:04:00 -0500 2010: Hi Maciej, > Can you set up a refresh cron job? Is pkgdb runnable from the login host? That might be the best box to run this from. Dago, what are your thoughts on best location? Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From dam at opencsw.org Thu Dec 16 21:26:42 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 21:26:42 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Refreshing the checkpkg database In-Reply-To: <1292529639-sup-1047@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <1292529639-sup-1047@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <83BF183E-E987-4FF4-8833-0F9270F8C830@opencsw.org> Hi Ben, Am 16.12.2010 um 21:01 schrieb Ben Walton: > Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski's message of Mon Dec 13 09:04:00 -0500 2010: > > Hi Maciej, > >> Can you set up a refresh cron job? > > Is pkgdb runnable from the login host? That might be the best box to > run this from. Dago, what are your thoughts on best location? Already done from the webzone. Best regards -- Dago From maciej at opencsw.org Thu Dec 16 22:30:25 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 21:30:25 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] bjam on the buildfarm Message-ID: Dear buildfarm admins, Could you install bjam on the buildfarm? Maciej From bwalton at opencsw.org Fri Dec 17 13:46:12 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:46:12 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] bjam on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1292589963-sup-724@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski's message of Thu Dec 16 16:30:25 -0500 2010: > Could you install bjam on the buildfarm? Doing this now. -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From dam at opencsw.org Fri Dec 17 16:59:19 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:59:19 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] bjam on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <865A1BF4-40E1-4503-8843-3ADDAE7493B4@opencsw.org> Hi Maciej, Am 16.12.2010 um 22:30 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > Could you install bjam on the buildfarm? I would, but it has not been released. Best regards -- Dago From maciej at opencsw.org Fri Dec 17 19:51:54 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 18:51:54 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] bjam on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: <865A1BF4-40E1-4503-8843-3ADDAE7493B4@opencsw.org> References: <865A1BF4-40E1-4503-8843-3ADDAE7493B4@opencsw.org> Message-ID: No dia 17 de Dezembro de 2010 15:59, Dagobert Michelsen escreveu: > Hi Maciej, > > Am 16.12.2010 um 22:30 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: >> Could you install bjam on the buildfarm? > > I would, but it has not been released. It should be available at the moment. From bwalton at opencsw.org Fri Dec 17 19:54:48 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:54:48 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] bjam on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: <865A1BF4-40E1-4503-8843-3ADDAE7493B4@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <1292612075-sup-351@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> > It should be available at the moment. Installing now.. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302