[csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] BerkeleyDB upgrade

[Dagobert Michelsen]

Hi Rupert,

Am 04.06.2010 um 07:52 schrieb rupert THURNER:
> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 22:05, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Hi Rupert,
>> 
>> Am 30.05.2010 um 22:02 schrieb rupert THURNER:
>>> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 20:35, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>>> Am 30.05.2010 um 12:57 schrieb rupert THURNER:
>>>>> could you please remove CSWbdb from the buildfarm? otherwise we would
>>>>> need to build something into the openldap recipe to not use it. and as
>>>>> i understood the goal is to recompile _without_ using files out of
>>>>> CSWbdb.
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, but this should be not difficult. It should be sufficuent to
>>>> add the stuff from subversion I added recently to openldap, like
>>>> EXTRA_INC etc.
>>> 
>>> what is the reason to leave a compatibility package on a buildserver?
>> 
>> They are needed by the packages depending on it, especially Apache2.
>> AFAIK removing CSWbdb would make it impossible to compile current
>> apache modules, but I may be wrong here.
>> 
>>>> Just let me know if you have trouble finding the right switches.
>>>> - and thanks for picking of OpenLDAP!
>>> 
>>> you are not serious about this, aren't you?
>>> 
>>>         EXTRA_LIB_garversion-2.4.22 = $(prefix)/bdb48/lib
>>>         EXTRA_INC_garversion-2.4.22 = $(prefix)/bdb48/include
>>> 
>>> was something you added long time ago to openldap :)
>> 
>> I thought so :) And you say it does not work? I would like to investigate
>> that if yes. I am not against removing CSWbdb, I would just like to know
>> why the switches don't work.
> 
> did you have any chance to look into this?

Sorry, not yet, and I will have very little time next week also. For now
I am removing CSWbdbdevel and CSWbdb from the current* buildservers.


Best regards

  -- Dago