[csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] BerkeleyDB upgrade

rupert THURNER rupert at opencsw.org
Tue Jun 8 06:48:33 CEST 2010


hi sebastian,

i saw you also started to use the -norunpath option in gar:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/changeset/10006.

dago already suggested to undo this gar change, what do you think?

we get errors like in the subversion configure which fails with:

rupert at current9s ~/mgar/pkg/subversion/trunk
$ vi work/solaris9-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/subversion-1.6.11/config.log


configure:21413: result: yes
configure:21525: checking for availability of Berkeley DB
configure:21597: /opt/studio/SOS12/SUNWspro/bin/cc -o conftest -xO3
-m32 -xarch=v8 -xnorunpath   -mt -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DNE_LFS
-I/opt/csw/bdb48/include  -I/opt/csw/apache2/include
-I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/apache2/include -I/opt/csw/include
-DSOLARIS2=8 -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -D_REENTRANT
-D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -m32 -xarch=v8 -norunpath -L/opt/csw/apache2/lib
-L/opt/csw/lib/svn -L/opt/csw/lib -lintl -liconv    -L/opt/csw/lib
-L/opt/csw/lib -L/opt/csw/bdb48/lib conftest.c  -L/opt/csw/lib -ldb
-lsocket  >&5
cc: Warning: illegal option -norunpath
configure:21597: $? = 0
configure:21597: ./conftest
ld.so.1: conftest: fatal: libdb-4.8.so: open failed: No such file or directory
./configure: line -2057:  4789 Killed                  ./conftest$ac_exeext
configure:21597: $? = 137
configure: program exited with status 137
configure: failed program was:


rupert.


On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:17, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Hi Rupert,
>
> Am 06.06.2010 um 07:22 schrieb rupert THURNER:
>>
>> which machine should i use for sparc, as
>>
>> rupert at current9s:~
>> $ ls -l /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libdb-4.7.so
>> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     other          36 Oct 19  2009
>> /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libdb-4.7.so ->
>> ../../bdb47/lib/sparcv9/libdb-4.7.so
>>
>> rupert at current9s:~
>> $ date
>> Sun Jun  6 00:20:21 CDT 2010
>
> Umh, I am pretty sure I removed it from the machine. I have again removed
> it, maybe a package upgrade of something triggered the reinstall??
>
>
> Best regards
>
>  -- Dago
>



More information about the buildfarm mailing list