From hson at opencsw.org Tue Mar 2 10:14:34 2010 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:14:34 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Package install Message-ID: <4B8CD6FA.6020809@opencsw.org> Could you update/install the following packages on the buildfarm: ilmbase ilmbase_devel libwmf libwmf_devel wmf wmf_fonts From dam at opencsw.org Tue Mar 2 10:28:21 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:28:21 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Package install In-Reply-To: <4B8CD6FA.6020809@opencsw.org> References: <4B8CD6FA.6020809@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <58A68639-D33D-4889-973C-6773F1252B8A@opencsw.org> Hi Roger, Am 02.03.2010 um 10:14 schrieb Roger H?kansson: > Could you update/install the following packages on the buildfarm: > ilmbase > ilmbase_devel > libwmf > libwmf_devel > wmf > wmf_fonts Doing this now. Best regards -- Dago From maciej at opencsw.org Thu Mar 4 11:41:26 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:41:26 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] gnome-icon-theme Message-ID: Please install on the buildfarm. AFAIK, it's the last dependency of evince that we need. From dam at opencsw.org Thu Mar 4 17:23:50 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:23:50 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] gnome-icon-theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, Am 04.03.2010 um 11:41 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > Please install on the buildfarm. AFAIK, it's the last dependency of > evince that we need. Doing this now. Best regards -- Dago From skayser at opencsw.org Thu Mar 4 22:24:01 2010 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:24:01 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install gzip_extras on the buildfarm ... Message-ID: <4B9024F1.7060007@opencsw.org> ... so that we can continue using zless to view gzipped packages produced by GAR. Thanks. Sebastian From bwalton at opencsw.org Fri Mar 5 02:18:05 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:18:05 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install gzip_extras on the buildfarm ... In-Reply-To: <4B9024F1.7060007@opencsw.org> References: <4B9024F1.7060007@opencsw.org> ; Excerpts from Sebastian Kayser's message of Thu Mar 04 16:24:01 -0500 2010: > ... so that we can continue using zless to view gzipped packages > produced by GAR. Thanks. Message-ID: <1267751870-sup-757@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Doing this now. Thanks -Ben -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rupert at opencsw.org Sun Mar 7 22:24:51 2010 From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER) Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 22:24:51 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] mercurial 1.5 testing - locale setting Message-ID: <6af4271003071324i547ea2cew1a152f47df1172d0@mail.gmail.com> is the following mercurial hg-1.5 test a pointless test case or it says something about our platform as well: $ ./run-tests.py test-gendoc ERROR: /home/rupert/mgar/pkg/mercurial/trunk/work/solaris8-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/mercurial-1.5/tests/test-gendoc output changed and returned error code 1 --- /home/rupert/mgar/pkg/mercurial/trunk/work/solaris8-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/mercurial-1.5/tests/test-gendoc.out +++ /home/rupert/mgar/pkg/mercurial/trunk/work/solaris8-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/mercurial-1.5/tests/test-gendoc.err @@ -1,33 +1,55 @@ +sh: rst2html: not found % extracting documentation from C checking for parse errors with rst2html +/home/rupert/mgar/pkg/mercurial/trunk/work/solaris8-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/mercurial-1.5/tests/test-gendoc: no: not found % extracting documentation from da +couldn't set locale correctly checking for parse errors with rst2html +/home/rupert/mgar/pkg/mercurial/trunk/work/solaris8-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/mercurial-1.5/tests/test-gendoc: no: not found % extracting documentation from de +couldn't set locale correctly checking for parse errors with rst2html +/home/rupert/mgar/pkg/mercurial/trunk/work/solaris8-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/mercurial-1.5/tests/test-gendoc: no: not found % extracting documentation from el +couldn't set locale correctly checking for parse errors with rst2html +/home/rupert/mgar/pkg/mercurial/trunk/work/solaris8-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/mercurial-1.5/tests/test-gendoc: no: not found % extracting documentation from fr +couldn't set locale correctly checking for parse errors with rst2html +/home/rupert/mgar/pkg/mercurial/trunk/work/solaris8-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/mercurial-1.5/tests/test-gendoc: no: not found % extracting documentation from it +couldn't set locale correctly checking for parse errors with rst2html +/home/rupert/mgar/pkg/mercurial/trunk/work/solaris8-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/mercurial-1.5/tests/test-gendoc: no: not found % extracting documentation from ja +couldn't set locale correctly checking for parse errors with rst2html +/home/rupert/mgar/pkg/mercurial/trunk/work/solaris8-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/mercurial-1.5/tests/test-gendoc: no: not found % extracting documentation from pt_BR +couldn't set locale correctly checking for parse errors with rst2html +/home/rupert/mgar/pkg/mercurial/trunk/work/solaris8-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/mercurial-1.5/tests/test-gendoc: no: not found % extracting documentation from sv +couldn't set locale correctly checking for parse errors with rst2html +/home/rupert/mgar/pkg/mercurial/trunk/work/solaris8-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/mercurial-1.5/tests/test-gendoc: no: not found % extracting documentation from zh_CN +couldn't set locale correctly checking for parse errors with rst2html +/home/rupert/mgar/pkg/mercurial/trunk/work/solaris8-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/mercurial-1.5/tests/test-gendoc: no: not found % extracting documentation from zh_TW +couldn't set locale correctly checking for parse errors with rst2html +/home/rupert/mgar/pkg/mercurial/trunk/work/solaris8-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/mercurial-1.5/tests/test-gendoc: no: not found ! Failed test-gendoc: output changed and returned error code 1 # Ran 1 tests, 0 skipped, 1 failed. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rupert at opencsw.org Sun Mar 7 22:32:48 2010 From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER) Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 22:32:48 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] what is different on buildfarm? mercurial tests take long - or fail In-Reply-To: <4B773036.4060209@kiilerich.com> References: <6af4271001020318k5f9fe830gd5378c9bf96e267b@mail.gmail.com> <4B70C470.8020407@kiilerich.com> <753BA391-09A5-4967-BBCE-347A0FE85BFE@opencsw.org> <6af4271002091403l7cd1d858i49bc0c5662d84bb4@mail.gmail.com> <4B71E9AB.9040406@kiilerich.com> <4B73738A.3080300@kiilerich.com> <9BAB57C2-7DA8-403D-AA46-1ECD94DF0307@opencsw.org> <6af4271002131100w5a26242dk473b1e581b665abd@mail.gmail.com> <4B773036.4060209@kiilerich.com> Message-ID: <6af4271003071332g58b92433jbf71302c1b4cc4f0@mail.gmail.com> i tested now hg-1.5 ... and i am wondering why we are back to "stall" on build8s with rupert at build8s :~/mgar/pkg/mercurial/trunk/work/solaris8-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/mercurial-1.5/tests $ time python ./run-tests.py test-push-http did python change back? rupert. On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 00:05, Mads Kiilerich wrote: > rupert THURNER wrote, On 02/13/2010 08:00 PM: > > >> >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 09:38, Dagobert Michelsen > dam at opencsw.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi Mads, >> >> Am 11.02.2010 um 04:03 schrieb Mads Kiilerich: >> >> My conclusion is that the patch is a huge improvement, and as >> far as I know there are no problems left. Python.org should >> apply the patch in next release, and you should consider to >> patch your Python package. >> >> >> Thanks for testing, I asked Maciej to respin a patched Python, >> commented >> on the bug and soon we will have a fully-functional Mercurial :-) >> >> >> just for the record - did this really impact mercurial as well, or "only" >> the test cases? >> > > I don't think it affected Mercurial itself, but it affected some usecases > for Mercurial. > > IIRC it was related to forking. Core Mercurial hardly forks, but it happens > when for example external hooks are used. > > /Mads > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dam at opencsw.org Sun Mar 7 22:48:36 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 22:48:36 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] what is different on buildfarm? mercurial tests take long - or fail In-Reply-To: <6af4271003071332g58b92433jbf71302c1b4cc4f0@mail.gmail.com> References: <6af4271001020318k5f9fe830gd5378c9bf96e267b@mail.gmail.com> <4B70C470.8020407@kiilerich.com> <753BA391-09A5-4967-BBCE-347A0FE85BFE@opencsw.org> <6af4271002091403l7cd1d858i49bc0c5662d84bb4@mail.gmail.com> <4B71E9AB.9040406@kiilerich.com> <4B73738A.3080300@kiilerich.com> <9BAB57C2-7DA8-403D-AA46-1ECD94DF0307@opencsw.org> <6af4271002131100w5a26242dk473b1e581b665abd@mail.gmail.com> <4B773036.4060209@kiilerich.com> <6af4271003071332g58b92433jbf71302c1b4cc4f0@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1C4A7F4D-0788-435D-B56E-4C71B1FB821E@opencsw.org> Hi Rupert, Am 07.03.2010 um 22:32 schrieb rupert THURNER: > i tested now hg-1.5 ... and i am wondering why we are back to > "stall" on build8s with The tests you are referring to were on build8st. Now as the updated Python has been released I am updating all machine now to current/. (Update started, going to bed now. Ben: Would you mind having a look in an hour or so?) Best regards -- Dago From rupert at opencsw.org Sun Mar 7 23:27:55 2010 From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER) Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 23:27:55 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] what is different on buildfarm? mercurial tests take long - or fail In-Reply-To: <1C4A7F4D-0788-435D-B56E-4C71B1FB821E@opencsw.org> References: <6af4271001020318k5f9fe830gd5378c9bf96e267b@mail.gmail.com> <6af4271002091403l7cd1d858i49bc0c5662d84bb4@mail.gmail.com> <4B71E9AB.9040406@kiilerich.com> <4B73738A.3080300@kiilerich.com> <9BAB57C2-7DA8-403D-AA46-1ECD94DF0307@opencsw.org> <6af4271002131100w5a26242dk473b1e581b665abd@mail.gmail.com> <4B773036.4060209@kiilerich.com> <6af4271003071332g58b92433jbf71302c1b4cc4f0@mail.gmail.com> <1C4A7F4D-0788-435D-B56E-4C71B1FB821E@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <6af4271003071427h6006f555n8945cfdf9a069a46@mail.gmail.com> can it be that solaris-10s does not produce this error, as the tests run there without stall? rupert at build10s:~/hg-crew-10s/tests $ ls -l /opt/csw/bin/python -rwxr-xr-x 2 root bin 6736 Dec 17 04:10 /opt/csw/bin/python rupert at build10s:~/hg-crew-10s/tests $ python --version Python 2.6.4 rupert. On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 22:48, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Rupert, > > Am 07.03.2010 um 22:32 schrieb rupert THURNER: > > i tested now hg-1.5 ... and i am wondering why we are back to "stall" on >> build8s with >> > > The tests you are referring to were on build8st. Now as the updated Python > has been > released I am updating all machine now to current/. > > (Update started, going to bed now. Ben: Would you mind having a look in an > hour or so?) > > > Best regards > > -- Dago > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maciej at opencsw.org Tue Mar 9 14:13:23 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 13:13:23 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] {,py_}xcbproto Message-ID: Please update the buildfarm with the {,py_}xcbproto packages. I'll proceed with libxcb and xcb-util. From dam at opencsw.org Tue Mar 9 14:32:00 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 14:32:00 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] {,py_}xcbproto In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, Am 09.03.2010 um 14:13 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > Please update the buildfarm with the {,py_}xcbproto packages. I'll > proceed with libxcb and xcb-util. Doing this now. Best regards -- Dago From bonivart at opencsw.org Wed Mar 10 11:13:13 2010 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:13:13 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install CSWcswpkgloghooks Message-ID: <625385e31003100213u6bfdc2a2k2c8968d6f2b9ff94@mail.gmail.com> Please install CSWcswpkgloghooks. -- /peter From dam at opencsw.org Wed Mar 10 12:40:58 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:40:58 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install CSWcswpkgloghooks In-Reply-To: <625385e31003100213u6bfdc2a2k2c8968d6f2b9ff94@mail.gmail.com> References: <625385e31003100213u6bfdc2a2k2c8968d6f2b9ff94@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <032104D6-65E8-42AB-9006-BF2E3B75DC4B@opencsw.org> Hi, Am 10.03.2010 um 11:13 schrieb Peter Bonivart: > Please install CSWcswpkgloghooks. Doing this now. Best regards -- Dago From rupert at opencsw.org Thu Mar 11 05:40:34 2010 From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:40:34 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: hg-1.5 test, solaris: up to 6 errors again, hg-crew 16 errors In-Reply-To: <6af4271003101847v59671489w887a9d8ac0b82f8b@mail.gmail.com> References: <85ad0363-289d-439d-9d90-c826b04c0685@o3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <4B945EA5.5010201@kiilerich.com> <6af4271003101847v59671489w887a9d8ac0b82f8b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <6af4271003102040k6e6a9496pfd8167154513bebd@mail.gmail.com> hi, mads posted the following on the mercurial-dev list. you have probably more experience than me judging what he means, especially about timeout and return codes. rupert. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mads Kiilerich Date: Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 03:19 Subject: Re: hg-1.5 test, solaris: up to 6 errors again, hg-crew 16 errors To: "rupert.thurner" Cc: mercurial-devel at selenic.com rupert.thurner wrote, On 03/07/2010 11:22 PM: > hi, > > i tested hg-1.5 for solaris, and we are back to 6 errors, which are: > > Failed test-gendoc: output changed and returned error code 1 > > $ uname -a SunOS build10x 5.10 Generic_137112-07 i86pc i386 i86pc $ which fjols no fjols in /home/mads/bin /opt/studio/SOS12/SUNWspro/bin /opt/studio/SOS11/SUNWspro/bin /opt/csw/bin /opt/csw/sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin /sbin /usr/ccs/bin /usr/dt/bin /usr/openwin/bin /opt/bop/bin /usr/sfw/bin /usr/sfw/sbin /opt/csw/mysql5/bin /opt/csw/apache2/sbin /opt/csw/php5/bin /opt/csw/gcc4/bin /usr/sfw/bin /usr/sfw/sbin /usr/apache2/bin $ echo $? 0 Come on. That is too far out. Please fix the OS. Failed test-mq-header-from: output changed and returned error code > 208 > > It seems like all the 208 failures has ### Abort: timeout after 180 seconds. Please try to increase the timeout value if you are running on a slow machine. It works for me. Failed test-merge-default: output changed and returned error code > 1 > > Patch for bashism has been sent. Failed test-mq-header-date: output changed and returned error code > 208 > Failed test-rename-merge2: output changed and returned error code > 208 > Failed test-mq: output changed and returned error code 208 > > for the details, see: > http://mercurial.pastebin.com/Sr8Ybf7a > > /Mads -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rupert.thurner at gmail.com Thu Mar 11 03:47:40 2010 From: rupert.thurner at gmail.com (rupert THURNER) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:47:40 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: hg-1.5 test, solaris: up to 6 errors again, hg-crew 16 errors In-Reply-To: <4B945EA5.5010201@kiilerich.com> References: <85ad0363-289d-439d-9d90-c826b04c0685@o3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <4B945EA5.5010201@kiilerich.com> Message-ID: <6af4271003101847v59671489w887a9d8ac0b82f8b@mail.gmail.com> hi, mads posted the following on the mercurial-dev list. you have probably more experience than me judging what he means, especially about timeout and return codes. rupert. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mads Kiilerich Date: Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 03:19 Subject: Re: hg-1.5 test, solaris: up to 6 errors again, hg-crew 16 errors To: "rupert.thurner" Cc: mercurial-devel at selenic.com rupert.thurner wrote, On 03/07/2010 11:22 PM: > hi, > > i tested hg-1.5 for solaris, and we are back to 6 errors, which are: > > Failed test-gendoc: output changed and returned error code 1 > > $ uname -a SunOS build10x 5.10 Generic_137112-07 i86pc i386 i86pc $ which fjols no fjols in /home/mads/bin /opt/studio/SOS12/SUNWspro/bin /opt/studio/SOS11/SUNWspro/bin /opt/csw/bin /opt/csw/sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin /sbin /usr/ccs/bin /usr/dt/bin /usr/openwin/bin /opt/bop/bin /usr/sfw/bin /usr/sfw/sbin /opt/csw/mysql5/bin /opt/csw/apache2/sbin /opt/csw/php5/bin /opt/csw/gcc4/bin /usr/sfw/bin /usr/sfw/sbin /usr/apache2/bin $ echo $? 0 Come on. That is too far out. Please fix the OS. Failed test-mq-header-from: output changed and returned error code > 208 > > It seems like all the 208 failures has ### Abort: timeout after 180 seconds. Please try to increase the timeout value if you are running on a slow machine. It works for me. Failed test-merge-default: output changed and returned error code > 1 > > Patch for bashism has been sent. Failed test-mq-header-date: output changed and returned error code > 208 > Failed test-rename-merge2: output changed and returned error code > 208 > Failed test-mq: output changed and returned error code 208 > > for the details, see: > http://mercurial.pastebin.com/Sr8Ybf7a > > /Mads -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maciej at opencsw.org Thu Mar 11 08:51:21 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:51:21 +0000 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] libxcb, libxcb_devel Message-ID: Please install on the buildfarm. I'll proceed with xcb-util. From dam at opencsw.org Thu Mar 11 11:59:30 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:59:30 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: hg-1.5 test, solaris: up to 6 errors again, hg-crew 16 errors In-Reply-To: <6af4271003101847v59671489w887a9d8ac0b82f8b@mail.gmail.com> References: <85ad0363-289d-439d-9d90-c826b04c0685@o3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <4B945EA5.5010201@kiilerich.com> <6af4271003101847v59671489w887a9d8ac0b82f8b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <39211EC6-3FFF-4DDC-8015-F8966F1C7EE4@opencsw.org> Hi Rupert, Am 11.03.2010 um 03:47 schrieb rupert THURNER: > hi, mads posted the following on the mercurial-dev list. you have > probably more experience than me judging what he means, especially > about timeout and return codes. > > rupert. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Mads Kiilerich > Date: Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 03:19 > Subject: Re: hg-1.5 test, solaris: up to 6 errors again, hg-crew 16 > errors > To: "rupert.thurner" > Cc: mercurial-devel at selenic.com > > > rupert.thurner wrote, On 03/07/2010 11:22 PM: > hi, > > i tested hg-1.5 for solaris, and we are back to 6 errors, which are: > > Failed test-gendoc: output changed and returned error code 1 > > > > $ uname -a > SunOS build10x 5.10 Generic_137112-07 i86pc i386 i86pc > $ which fjols > no fjols in /home/mads/bin /opt/studio/SOS12/SUNWspro/bin /opt/ > studio/SOS11/SUNWspro/bin /opt/csw/bin /opt/csw/sbin /usr/bin /usr/ > sbin /sbin /usr/ccs/bin /usr/dt/bin /usr/openwin/bin /opt/bop/bin / > usr/sfw/bin /usr/sfw/sbin /opt/csw/mysql5/bin /opt/csw/apache2/sbin / > opt/csw/php5/bin /opt/csw/gcc4/bin /usr/sfw/bin /usr/sfw/sbin /usr/ > apache2/bin > $ echo $? > 0 > > Come on. That is too far out. Please fix the OS. This is indeed the case for /usr/bin/which. However, e.g. zsh builtin which works. There may also be one substitute in coreutils. Ben? > > Failed test-mq-header-from: output changed and returned error code > 208 > > > It seems like all the 208 failures has > > ### Abort: timeout after 180 seconds. > > Please try to increase the timeout value if you are running on a > slow machine. It works for me. > > > Failed test-merge-default: output changed and returned error code > 1 > > > Patch for bashism has been sent. > > Failed test-mq-header-date: output changed and returned error code > 208 > Failed test-rename-merge2: output changed and returned error code > 208 > Failed test-mq: output changed and returned error code 208 > > for the details, see: > http://mercurial.pastebin.com/Sr8Ybf7a > > This timeout may be adjustable in the Makefile. Please take a look if it is adjustable. Best regards -- Dago -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dam at opencsw.org Thu Mar 11 12:03:23 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:03:23 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] libxcb, libxcb_devel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9F61EADC-6F39-4F0C-A559-BD52CDFCD2F2@opencsw.org> Hi Maciej, Am 11.03.2010 um 08:51 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > Please install on the buildfarm. I'll proceed with xcb-util. The updated libxcb, libxcb_devel have not reached the mirror yet. Queing. Best regards -- Dago From bwalton at opencsw.org Thu Mar 11 15:15:08 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:15:08 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: hg-1.5 test, solaris: up to 6 errors again, hg-crew 16 errors In-Reply-To: <39211EC6-3FFF-4DDC-8015-F8966F1C7EE4@opencsw.org> References: <85ad0363-289d-439d-9d90-c826b04c0685@o3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <4B945EA5.5010201@kiilerich.com> <6af4271003101847v59671489w887a9d8ac0b82f8b@mail.gmail.com> <39211EC6-3FFF-4DDC-8015-F8966F1C7EE4@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <1268316825-sup-9191@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Dagobert Michelsen's message of Thu Mar 11 05:59:30 -0500 2010: Hi Dago, Rupert, > This is indeed the case for /usr/bin/which. However, e.g. zsh > builtin which works. There may also be one substitute in > coreutils. Ben? Coreutils doesn't provide a which (or gwhich). HTH. -Ben -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dam at opencsw.org Thu Mar 11 22:49:10 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:49:10 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] libxcb, libxcb_devel In-Reply-To: <9F61EADC-6F39-4F0C-A559-BD52CDFCD2F2@opencsw.org> References: <9F61EADC-6F39-4F0C-A559-BD52CDFCD2F2@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Maciej, Am 11.03.2010 um 12:03 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen: > Am 11.03.2010 um 08:51 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: >> Please install on the buildfarm. I'll proceed with xcb-util. > > The updated libxcb, libxcb_devel have not reached the mirror yet. > Queing. Doing this now. Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Tue Mar 16 11:17:53 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:17:53 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Updating all buildservers now Message-ID: Hi, I am updating all servers to current now, please stand by. Best regards -- Dago From skayser at opencsw.org Tue Mar 16 22:52:24 2010 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:52:24 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install librsync ... Message-ID: <4B9FFD98.4020403@opencsw.org> ... it's required for csync2 as well as rdiff-backup. TIA! Sebastian From bwalton at opencsw.org Wed Mar 17 01:08:23 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:08:23 -0400 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install librsync ... In-Reply-To: <4B9FFD98.4020403@opencsw.org> References: <4B9FFD98.4020403@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <1268784495-sup-6065@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Sebastian Kayser's message of Tue Mar 16 17:52:24 -0400 2010: > ... it's required for csync2 as well as rdiff-backup. TIA! Doing this now. -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From hson at opencsw.org Wed Mar 17 10:58:28 2010 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:58:28 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] libatk_devel Message-ID: <4BA0A7C4.5020507@opencsw.org> Please install on buildfarm. From dam at opencsw.org Wed Mar 17 12:29:36 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:29:36 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] libatk_devel In-Reply-To: <4BA0A7C4.5020507@opencsw.org> References: <4BA0A7C4.5020507@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <9B5B7FED-B4DA-46E5-80E0-E44A9BD0CBA6@opencsw.org> Hi Roger, Am 17.03.2010 um 10:58 schrieb Roger H?kansson: > Please install on buildfarm. Doing this now. Best regards -- Dago From bwalton at opencsw.org Wed Mar 17 14:20:21 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:20:21 -0400 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install librsync ... In-Reply-To: <4B9FFD98.4020403@opencsw.org> References: <4B9FFD98.4020403@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <1268831967-sup-6865@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Sebastian Kayser's message of Tue Mar 16 17:52:24 -0400 2010: > ... it's required for csync2 as well as rdiff-backup. TIA! I attempted to do this last night but it's still not in the catalog as of this am. It's listed on packages/, but doesn't have a specific entry (no mantis registration). Catalog problem? Registration problem? Phil? Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From hson at opencsw.org Sat Mar 20 03:50:35 2010 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:50:35 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] ghostscript Message-ID: <4BA437FB.1090504@opencsw.org> Please update ghotscript on buildfarm From bwalton at opencsw.org Sat Mar 20 03:53:40 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:53:40 -0400 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] ghostscript In-Reply-To: <4BA437FB.1090504@opencsw.org> References: <4BA437FB.1090504@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <1269053593-sup-1954@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Roger H?kansson's message of Fri Mar 19 22:50:35 -0400 2010: > Please update ghotscript on buildfarm Doing this now. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From hson at opencsw.org Sat Mar 20 04:59:16 2010 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:59:16 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] sync buildfarm Message-ID: <4BA44814.4000809@opencsw.org> Please update the buildfarm with these packages, right now it differs between the machines if the packages are installed and if they are installed which version is installed autogen cswutils djvulibre djvulibre_rt djvulibre_devel lcms lcms_rt lcms_devel ilmbase_devel ilmbase openexr_rt openexr_devel openexr fftw imlib2 From dam at opencsw.org Sat Mar 20 08:15:19 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:15:19 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] sync buildfarm In-Reply-To: <4BA44814.4000809@opencsw.org> References: <4BA44814.4000809@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <42C610A0-23F7-4268-99FC-40D389E4782F@opencsw.org> Hi, Am 20.03.2010 um 04:59 schrieb Roger H?kansson: > Please update the buildfarm with these packages, right now it > differs between the machines if the packages are installed and if > they are installed which version is installed > > autogen cswutils djvulibre djvulibre_rt djvulibre_devel lcms lcms_rt > lcms_devel ilmbase_devel ilmbase openexr_rt openexr_devel openexr > fftw imlib2 Doing this now. Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Sat Mar 20 08:31:54 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:31:54 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs librsync In-Reply-To: <20100317142549.GJ27943@sebastiankayser.de> References: <201003160754.o2G7sRmK025666@login.bo.opencsw.org> <4B9FB3CF.9020500@opencsw.org> <20100317142549.GJ27943@sebastiankayser.de> Message-ID: Hi Sebastian, Am 17.03.2010 um 15:25 schrieb Sebastian Kayser: > * Philip Brown wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Brian Hill >> wrote: >>> Oke doke. All librsync undesirables have been removed.. >>> >>> Brian >>> >> >> Thanks Brian! definately makes my job easier now. >> remaining stuff has been batched. > > Any hickups publishing librsync? It's not yet in Mantis, nor is it > available in the catalog (Ibiblio's and the one from my German > mirror). Done. Best regards -- Dago From hson at opencsw.org Sun Mar 21 06:51:51 2010 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:51:51 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] graphviz_devel Message-ID: <4BA5B3F7.5030109@opencsw.org> Please install graphviz_devel on the buildfarm From dam at opencsw.org Sun Mar 21 07:33:07 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:33:07 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] graphviz_devel In-Reply-To: <4BA5B3F7.5030109@opencsw.org> References: <4BA5B3F7.5030109@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi, Am 21.03.2010 um 06:51 schrieb Roger H?kansson: > Please install graphviz_devel on the buildfarm Doing this now. Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Wed Mar 24 16:05:23 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:05:23 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] General buildfarm update References: <6DA53F54-076E-4C2C-B36B-252B3C678AEE@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi, as OpenCSW has officially decomissioned Solaris 8 I have changed the general machine layout. There are now two sets of machines: * current These servers run the current/ stack from OpenCSW and are suited to build releasable packages. The existing servers build8x, build9x and build10x have been replaced by VMs, whereas the most noticable difference is that current8x had only one vCPU, whereas build8x had two CPUs. Available servers are - current8s, current8x - current9s, current9x - current10s, current10x - Soon: currentosols, currentosolx * testing These servers run various experimental packages from experimental and are used either for testing/ or project-related releases. If releasable packages are to be produced extra care must be taken to stay in sync with current/. Available servers are - testing8s, testing8x - testing9s, testing9x - testing10s, testing10x - Soon: testingosols, testingosolx Please let me know at buildfarm at opencsw.org if you encounter anything strange. Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Wed Mar 24 21:50:05 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:50:05 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Updating buildfarm now with Perl 5.10.1 Message-ID: <06B118F8-1E3E-4612-811C-2CF35881B9FE@opencsw.org> Hi, I am updating the Buildfarm now with Perl 5.10.1 and all corresponding modules :-D Please stand by! Best regards -- Dago From yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org Thu Mar 25 00:23:19 2010 From: yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org (Yann Rouillard) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:23:19 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install py_yaml Message-ID: <4BAA9EE7.4040500@pleiades.fr.eu.org> Please install py_yaml on current10s, checkpkg needs it: gmake: Entering directory `/home/yann/mgar/openssh/trunk' [===== NOW BUILDING: openssh-5.4p1 =====] ==> Verifying for installed package CSWpy-yaml: MISSING gmake: *** [prerequisitepkg-CSWpy-yaml] Error 1 gmake: Leaving directory `/home/yann/mgar/openssh/trunk' Connection to current10x closed. Yann From bwalton at opencsw.org Thu Mar 25 03:12:32 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:12:32 -0400 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install py_yaml In-Reply-To: <4BAA9EE7.4040500@pleiades.fr.eu.org> References: <4BAA9EE7.4040500@pleiades.fr.eu.org> Message-ID: <1269483140-sup-8781@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Yann Rouillard's message of Wed Mar 24 19:23:19 -0400 2010: > Please install py_yaml on current10s, checkpkg needs it: Done. -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From hson at opencsw.org Fri Mar 26 10:15:01 2010 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:15:01 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] current10x missing a lot of packages Message-ID: <4BAC7B15.3060104@opencsw.org> current10x only have 188 CSW packages installed where the rest have 926(8x/9x)/927(8s/9s/10s) (ntop is installed on 8s/9s/10s, but not on 8x/9x). From hson at opencsw.org Fri Mar 26 10:21:42 2010 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:21:42 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] liblqr Message-ID: <4BAC7CA6.3030504@opencsw.org> Please install liblqr and liblqr_devel on the buildfarm From dam at opencsw.org Fri Mar 26 10:27:18 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:27:18 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] liblqr In-Reply-To: <4BAC7CA6.3030504@opencsw.org> References: <4BAC7CA6.3030504@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi, Am 26.03.2010 um 10:21 schrieb Roger H?kansson: > Please install liblqr and liblqr_devel on the buildfarm Doing this now. Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Fri Mar 26 10:29:18 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:29:18 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] current10x missing a lot of packages In-Reply-To: <4BAC7B15.3060104@opencsw.org> References: <4BAC7B15.3060104@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <155F4EE7-1364-494F-8312-660A19E941E0@opencsw.org> Hi Roger, Am 26.03.2010 um 10:15 schrieb Roger H?kansson: > current10x only have 188 CSW packages installed where the rest have > 926(8x/9x)/927(8s/9s/10s) I cannot reproduce this: > current10x% pkginfo | grep CSW | wc -l > 926 I did major updates yesterday, are your stats from that time? You may also take a look at which is updated every few hours. > (ntop is installed on 8s/9s/10s, but not on 8x/9x). If you need it I can install that too. Best regards -- Dago From pfelecan at opencsw.org Wed Mar 31 14:25:47 2010 From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN) Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:25:47 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] ClamAV 0.96 on Solaris9/10 - Intel In-Reply-To: <4BB3247C.8040104@clamav.net> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22T=F6r=F6k?= Edwin"'s message of "Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:31:24 +0300") References: <4BB3247C.8040104@clamav.net> Message-ID: T?r?k Edwin writes: > Hi Peter, Szervusz from the other Peter... > First of all I found the problem with the broken gcc4 on Solaris9 on the > buildfarm: you have a gcc4 built on Solaris8, and it has fix-includes > from Solaris8 headers! > [...] The lesson from your diagnosis is that an includes fixing must be done at install time of the gcc4 package; if that's not the case, the fixing can be called on the system on which the package is installed. As I'm not the maintainer of the gcc4 packages, the only thing for which I can help is to say that for gcc3 the includes fixing is done at installation time. -- Peter FELECAN From bonivart at opencsw.org Wed Mar 31 16:15:25 2010 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:15:25 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] ClamAV 0.96 on Solaris9/10 - Intel In-Reply-To: <4BB3423C.3050401@clamav.net> References: <4BB3247C.8040104@clamav.net> <4BB3423C.3050401@clamav.net> Message-ID: 2010/3/31 T?r?k Edwin : > I thought you were, sorry for the confusion. Can you forward my mail to > the gcc4 maintainer? Our gcc4 maintainer is on sabbatical, I'll try to contact him or someone else will have a go at fixing this. Thanks a lot for your efforts. -- /peter From pfelecan at opencsw.org Wed Mar 31 16:53:59 2010 From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN) Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:53:59 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] ClamAV 0.96 on Solaris9/10 - Intel In-Reply-To: (Peter Bonivart's message of "Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:15:25 +0200") References: <4BB3247C.8040104@clamav.net> <4BB3423C.3050401@clamav.net> Message-ID: Peter Bonivart writes: > 2010/3/31 T?r?k Edwin : >> I thought you were, sorry for the confusion. Can you forward my mail to >> the gcc4 maintainer? > > Our gcc4 maintainer is on sabbatical, I'll try to contact him or > someone else will have a go at fixing this. Thanks a lot for your > efforts. To correct this for the build systems you can fix the includes without correcting the packages or re-installing; something like /opt/csw/gcc4/bin/mkheaders (see how it's invoked in the gcc3core postinstall script). -- Peter FELECAN mailto:pfelecan at acm.org From dam at baltic-online.de Tue Mar 30 15:30:37 2010 From: dam at baltic-online.de (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:30:37 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Testing neon on testing9s Message-ID: Hi, I am currently testing neon with aux libs on testing9s. Please don't be astonished if svn doesn't work there now :-) Best regards -- Dago From edwin at clamav.net Wed Mar 31 12:31:24 2010 From: edwin at clamav.net (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=F6r=F6k_Edwin?=) Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:31:24 +0300 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] ClamAV 0.96 on Solaris9/10 - Intel Message-ID: <4BB3247C.8040104@clamav.net> Hi Peter, First of all I found the problem with the broken gcc4 on Solaris9 on the buildfarm: you have a gcc4 built on Solaris8, and it has fix-includes from Solaris8 headers! $ cat >x.c #include #include If I include it is missing upad128_t needed by signal.h: $ /opt/csw/gcc4/bin/g++ -E x.c | grep upad128 upad128_t fx_xmm[8]; upad128_t __fx_ign2[14]; upad128_t xmm[8]; However the type is there: $ /opt/csw/gcc4/bin/g++ -E /usr/include/sys/types.h|grep upad128 } upad128_t; Then I found that on Solaris9 (current9x) you are using the Solaris8 headers: /opt/csw/gcc4/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.8/4.3.3/include-fixed/sys/types.h /opt/csw/gcc4/bin/gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: i386-pc-solaris2.8 So when you built GCC4 on Solaris8, it has run fix-includes on sys/types.h, and it is using that instead of system's sys/types.h. That works fine on Solaris8 (I assume), however is wrong for Solaris9 (which has a different sys/types.h header). Although the gcc4 from Solaris8 is probably binary compatible with Solaris9, using a header from Solaris8 on Solaris9 is certainly not compatible. So you need to build GCC4 on Solaris9, so that it runs fix-includes on the Solaris9 header. Once you have a GCC4 built on Solaris9 you should be able to use that to build ClamAV. For reference here is the error you get with gcc4 on Solaris9 $ /opt/csw/gcc4/bin/g++ x.c In file included from /opt/csw/gcc4/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.8/4.3.3/include-fixed/sys/reg.h:22, from /usr/include/sys/regset.h:24, from /usr/include/sys/ucontext.h:21, from /opt/csw/gcc4/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.8/4.3.3/include-fixed/sys/signal.h:252, from /opt/csw/gcc4/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.8/4.3.3/include-fixed/signal.h:36, from x.c:2: /usr/include/ia32/sys/reg.h:300: error: 'upad128_t' does not name a type /usr/include/ia32/sys/reg.h:301: error: 'upad128_t' does not name a type /usr/include/ia32/sys/reg.h:331: error: 'upad128_t' does not name a type BTW everything is fine when building on Solaris10/Intel (and everything is fine on Solaris8,9,10/Sparc): I tested this: http://git.clamav.net/gitweb?p=clamav-devel.git;a=snapshot;h=c5fb062ec3a22b2e35fca555cb59d4a5646fef2e;sf=tgz Solaris10/Intel: $ export PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/opt/csw/bin $ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/csw/gcc4/lib $ ./configure CC=/opt/csw/gcc4/bin/gcc CXX=/opt/csw/gcc4/bin/g++ --disable-clamav --enable-llvm --enable-check --with-libcheck-prefix=/home/edwin/checkx $ gmake -j2 $ gmake check -j2 .... PASS: llvmcheck.sh ================== All 6 tests passed ================== .... PASS: check_freshclam.sh PASS: check_sigtool.sh SKIP: check_unit_vg.sh PASS: check1_clamscan.sh PASS: check_clamav PASS: check2_clamd.sh PASS: check3_clamd.sh SKIP: check5_clamd_vg.sh SKIP: check6_clamd_vg.sh SKIP: check7_clamd_hg.sh SKIP: check8_clamd_hg.sh PASS: check4_clamd.sh ====================== All 7 tests passed (5 tests were not run) ====================== Best regards, --Edwin From edwin at clamav.net Wed Mar 31 14:38:20 2010 From: edwin at clamav.net (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=F6r=F6k_Edwin?=) Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:38:20 +0300 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] ClamAV 0.96 on Solaris9/10 - Intel In-Reply-To: References: <4BB3247C.8040104@clamav.net> Message-ID: <4BB3423C.3050401@clamav.net> On 03/31/2010 03:25 PM, Peter FELECAN wrote: > T?r?k Edwin writes: > >> Hi Peter, > > Szervusz from the other Peter... Hi, > >> First of all I found the problem with the broken gcc4 on Solaris9 on the >> buildfarm: you have a gcc4 built on Solaris8, and it has fix-includes >> from Solaris8 headers! >> [...] > > The lesson from your diagnosis is that an includes fixing must be done at > install time of the gcc4 package; if that's not the case, the fixing can > be called on the system on which the package is installed. > > As I'm not the maintainer of the gcc4 packages, I thought you were, sorry for the confusion. Can you forward my mail to the gcc4 maintainer? > the only thing for which > I can help is to say that for gcc3 the includes fixing is done at > installation time. > Sounds good. Best regards, --Edwin