From yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org Wed Sep 1 20:45:01 2010 From: yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org (Yann Rouillard) Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 20:45:01 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] SUNWspro and libyabe.so Message-ID: <4C7E9F2D.7020804@pleiades.fr.eu.org> Dear buildfarm maintainers, I am currently trying to compile last openssl version and I am running into the following error: [...] making all in crypto... gmake[3]: Entering directory `/home/yann/mgar/openssl/trunk/work/solaris9-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/openssl-0.9.8o/crypto' cc -I. -I.. -I../include -KPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -xarch=v8 -xO5 -xstrconst -xdepend -Xa -DB_ENDIAN -DBN_DIV2W -I/opt/csw/include -c -o cryptlib.o cryptlib.c ld.so.1: acomp: fatal: libyabe.so: open failed: No such file or directory cc: Fatal error in /opt/studio/SOS11/SUNWspro/prod/bin/acomp : Killed gmake[3]: *** [cryptlib.o] Error 9 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/home/yann/mgar/openssl/trunk/work/solaris9-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/openssl-0.9.8o/crypto' gmake[2]: *** [build_crypto] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/home/yann/mgar/openssl/trunk/work/solaris9-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/openssl-0.9.8o' gmake[1]: *** [build-work/solaris9-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/openssl-0.9.8o/Makefile] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/yann/mgar/openssl/trunk' gmake: *** [merge-isa-sparcv8] Error 2 It seems to be related to SUNWspro so I am trying to know at your door. Any idea what is the origin of this problem ? I saw the following pages on internet about libyabe.so: http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+ha-clusters/FAQ#buildingagents http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5071875 libyabe.so is present at: /opt/SUNWspro/prod/lib/sys/libyabe.so I might add this path but I suppose there is something else wrong. Thanks in advance for your answer. Yann From dam at opencsw.org Thu Sep 2 09:57:58 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 09:57:58 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] SUNWspro and libyabe.so In-Reply-To: <4C7E9F2D.7020804@pleiades.fr.eu.org> References: <4C7E9F2D.7020804@pleiades.fr.eu.org> Message-ID: Hi Yann, Am 01.09.2010 um 20:45 schrieb Yann Rouillard: > Dear buildfarm maintainers, > > I am currently trying to compile last openssl version and I am > running into the following error: > > [...] > making all in crypto... > gmake[3]: Entering directory `/home/yann/mgar/openssl/trunk/work/ > solaris9-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/openssl-0.9.8o/crypto' > cc -I. -I.. -I../include -KPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DOPENSSL_THREADS - > D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -xarch=v8 -xO5 -xstrconst - > xdepend -Xa -DB_ENDIAN -DBN_DIV2W -I/opt/csw/include -c -o > cryptlib.o cryptlib.c > ld.so.1: acomp: fatal: libyabe.so: open failed: No such file or > directory > cc: Fatal error in /opt/studio/SOS11/SUNWspro/prod/bin/acomp : Killed > gmake[3]: *** [cryptlib.o] Error 9 > gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/home/yann/mgar/openssl/trunk/work/ > solaris9-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/openssl-0.9.8o/crypto' > gmake[2]: *** [build_crypto] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/home/yann/mgar/openssl/trunk/work/ > solaris9-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/openssl-0.9.8o' > gmake[1]: *** [build-work/solaris9-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/ > openssl-0.9.8o/Makefile] Error 2 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/yann/mgar/openssl/trunk' > gmake: *** [merge-isa-sparcv8] Error 2 > > It seems to be related to SUNWspro so I am trying to know at your > door. > > Any idea what is the origin of this problem ? > > I saw the following pages on internet about libyabe.so: > http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+ha-clusters/FAQ#buildingagents > http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5071875 > > libyabe.so is present at: > /opt/SUNWspro/prod/lib/sys/libyabe.so > > I might add this path but I suppose there is something else wrong. I suppose the problem is that you are compiling with Sun Studio 11 when libyabe.so is from Sun Studio 12. I suggest removing GARCOMPILER = SOS11 Best regards -- Dago From yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org Thu Sep 2 20:33:58 2010 From: yann at pleiades.fr.eu.org (Yann Rouillard) Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:33:58 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install libsocks In-Reply-To: <4C7C1F05.80008@pleiades.fr.eu.org> References: <4C7C1F05.80008@pleiades.fr.eu.org> Message-ID: <4C7FEE16.6080309@pleiades.fr.eu.org> Hi again, Could you update the libsocks package to the 1.2.1 version which has just been released ? (FI, the reason is explained here https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4536 ). Thanks in advance, Yann On 30/08/2010 23:13, Yann Rouillard wrote: > Hi, > > Could you please install the libsocks package on the buildfarm ? > I need it to be enable to add socks5 support to lftp: > > [...] > checking whether to use NLS... yes > checking where the gettext function comes from... external libintl > checking how to link with libintl... /opt/csw/lib/libintl.so -R/opt/csw/lib > checking for main in -lsocks5... no > configure: error: cannot find -lsocks5 library > > Thanks in advance. > > Yann From dam at opencsw.org Thu Sep 2 21:21:17 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 21:21:17 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install libsocks In-Reply-To: <4C7FEE16.6080309@pleiades.fr.eu.org> References: <4C7C1F05.80008@pleiades.fr.eu.org> <4C7FEE16.6080309@pleiades.fr.eu.org> Message-ID: Hi Yann, Am 02.09.2010 um 20:33 schrieb Yann Rouillard: > Could you update the libsocks package to the 1.2.1 version which has > just been released ? > (FI, the reason is explained here https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4536 > ). Updating this now. Best regards -- Dago From rupert at opencsw.org Wed Sep 8 19:32:11 2010 From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER) Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 19:32:11 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs apr_util In-Reply-To: References: <201009031851.o83Ip6MM018962@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: could oyu please upgrade apr, apr-util to the newest version? rupert ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Philip Brown Date: Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 00:09 Subject: Re: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs apr_util To: pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org Thanks. batched On 9/3/10, THURNER Rupert wrote: > correct package name > * apr_util: revision upgrade > ? - from: 2010.07.26 > ? - ? to: 2010.09.03 > ? + apr_util-1.3.9,REV=2010.09.03-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > ? + apr_util-1.3.9,REV=2010.09.03-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > > -- > Generated by submitpkg > _______________________________________________ > pkgsubmissions mailing list > pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org > https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions > _______________________________________________ pkgsubmissions mailing list pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions From bwalton at opencsw.org Wed Sep 8 20:49:13 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:49:13 -0400 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs apr_util In-Reply-To: References: <201009031851.o83Ip6MM018962@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <1283971743-sup-9273@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from rupert THURNER's message of Wed Sep 08 13:32:11 -0400 2010: > could oyu please upgrade apr, apr-util to the newest version? In flight. -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From maciej at opencsw.org Thu Sep 16 11:58:46 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:58:46 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Findutils database freshness Message-ID: Findutils database is out of data at least on some boxes: maciej at current10s [current10s]:~ > glocate dir.h glocate: warning: database `/var/opt/csw/locatedb' is more than 8 days old (actual age is 133.2 days) I remember that gupdatedb used to be run from cron, but it caused a problem with the complete FS scan taking more than 24h and a bunch of gupdatedb processes stacking up. What's the current status, does anyone know? Maciej From dam at opencsw.org Thu Sep 16 12:29:02 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 12:29:02 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Findutils database freshness In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3E32871B-0BA9-4C3D-832E-BFBF57E6F806@opencsw.org> Hi Maciej, Am 16.09.2010 um 11:58 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: > Findutils database is out of data at least on some boxes: > > maciej at current10s [current10s]:~ > glocate dir.h > glocate: warning: database `/var/opt/csw/locatedb' is more than 8 days > old (actual age is 133.2 days) > > I remember that gupdatedb used to be run from cron, but it caused a > problem with the complete FS scan taking more than 24h and a bunch of > gupdatedb processes stacking up. What's the current status, does > anyone know? I know :) I deactivated gupdatedb because it took too long to update. I could exclude /export as it is mounted on the sparc zones from login anyway. Do you need it? Best regards -- Dago From maciej at opencsw.org Thu Sep 16 13:22:15 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 12:22:15 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Findutils database freshness In-Reply-To: <3E32871B-0BA9-4C3D-832E-BFBF57E6F806@opencsw.org> References: <3E32871B-0BA9-4C3D-832E-BFBF57E6F806@opencsw.org> Message-ID: No dia 16 de Setembro de 2010 11:29, Dagobert Michelsen escreveu: > Hi Maciej, > > Am 16.09.2010 um 11:58 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski: >> >> Findutils database is out of data at least on some boxes: >> >> maciej at current10s [current10s]:~ > glocate dir.h >> glocate: warning: database `/var/opt/csw/locatedb' is more than 8 days >> old (actual age is 133.2 days) >> >> I remember that gupdatedb used to be run from cron, but it caused a >> problem with the complete FS scan taking more than 24h and a bunch of >> gupdatedb processes stacking up. ?What's the current status, does >> anyone know? > > I know :) I deactivated gupdatedb because it took too long to update. > I could exclude /export as it is mounted on the sparc zones from login > anyway. Do you need it? I can live without it, but it's a really useful tool when looking for header files and such. If I don't have glocate I use find, but it's much slower if I want to run several variants of a search. If it's taking a long time, you can schedule it once a week, it's still better than not at all. Also, /export can be safely excluded. From jensd at bender.opencsw.org Fri Sep 17 23:55:05 2010 From: jensd at bender.opencsw.org (Jens Deppe) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 23:55:05 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Latest libffi/libffidevel on build servers Message-ID: <20100917215505.GA2071@bender.opencsw.org> Hi, I'm trying to build the latest version of Ruby (1.9.2 p0) and am running into a compiler issue related to libffi headers. The fix appears to be in libffi 3.0.9 (which is in svn), but the build servers still have 3.0.8. Would it be possible to update the build servers to the latest libffi/libffidevel (3.0.9)? Thanks very much --Jens From bwalton at opencsw.org Sat Sep 18 01:43:29 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 19:43:29 -0400 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Latest libffi/libffidevel on build servers In-Reply-To: <20100917215505.GA2071@bender.opencsw.org> References: <20100917215505.GA2071@bender.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <1284766806-sup-3533@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Jens Deppe's message of Fri Sep 17 17:55:05 -0400 2010: Hi Jens, > I'm trying to build the latest version of Ruby (1.9.2 p0) and am > running into a compiler issue related to libffi headers. The fix > appears to be in libffi 3.0.9 (which is in svn), but the build > servers still have 3.0.8. Would it be possible to update the build > servers to the latest libffi/libffidevel (3.0.9)? The policy is that the buildfarm (current* boxen) only get packages available from the current catalog. There are testing* boxen that we can use to put things from experimental into play when required. When you say that 3.0.9 is in svn, do that mean there is an updated GAR recipe for it? If so, the best approach is to ping the maintainer[1] for an update and if there's no active maintainer, take it over! :) HTH. -Ben [1] In this case, Mike Watters is on 'sabbatical' so you'd be best to roll the updated package yourself. -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From rupert at opencsw.org Fri Sep 24 23:32:02 2010 From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER) Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:32:02 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: current10s and others, c compiler for python development is missing In-Reply-To: References: <4C9A8A5B.6040207@kiilerich.com> <994862BA-8BAE-4C74-8F13-F117279CB8B3@opencsw.org> Message-ID: could you please put it on the beuildfarm as well, then we could roll the new mercurial release. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski Date: Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 03:29 Subject: Re: current10s and others, c compiler for python development is missing To: rupert THURNER Cc: Dagobert Michelsen , Mads Kiilerich No dia 23 de Setembro de 2010 12:29, rupert THURNER escreveu: > eh ... the mercurial build tests do test it thoroughly :) Hah :-) OK, I installed in on a box I have access to. ?Seems to working fine, I've sent to Phil and it's been released. ?I'll take some time before it hits the mirrors. From bwalton at opencsw.org Sat Sep 25 16:19:45 2010 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 10:19:45 -0400 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: current10s and others, c compiler for python development is missing In-Reply-To: References: <4C9A8A5B.6040207@kiilerich.com> <994862BA-8BAE-4C74-8F13-F117279CB8B3@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <1285424360-sup-4741@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from rupert THURNER's message of Fri Sep 24 17:32:02 -0400 2010: Hi Rupert, > could you please put it on the beuildfarm as well, then we could > roll the new mercurial release. What is the actual package being requested here? Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From dam at opencsw.org Sun Sep 26 21:20:43 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:20:43 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Latest libffi/libffidevel on build servers In-Reply-To: <20100924151725.GA17522@bender.opencsw.org> References: <1284766806-sup-3533@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <5DFBCD19-C953-4DB1-8B44-F2AA6803F12D@opencsw.org> <20100924151725.GA17522@bender.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <65E0A60E-E424-41F5-9E2E-CBF5A18E6100@opencsw.org> Hi Jens, Am 24.09.2010 um 17:17 schrieb Jens Deppe: > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 07:46:22AM +0200, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail: >>>> I'm trying to build the latest version of Ruby (1.9.2 p0) and am >>>> running into a compiler issue related to libffi headers. The fix >>>> appears to be in libffi 3.0.9 (which is in svn), but the build >>>> servers still have 3.0.8. Would it be possible to update the build >>>> servers to the latest libffi/libffidevel (3.0.9)? >>> >>> The policy is that the buildfarm (current* boxen) only get packages >>> available from the current catalog. There are testing* boxen that >>> we >>> can use to put things from experimental into play when required. >>> >>> When you say that 3.0.9 is in svn, do that mean there is an updated >>> GAR recipe for it? If so, the best approach is to ping the >>> maintainer[1] >>> for an update and if there's no active maintainer, take it over! :) >>> >>> HTH. >>> -Ben >>> >>> [1] In this case, Mike Watters is on 'sabbatical' so you'd be best >>> to >>> roll the updated package yourself. >> >> As Roger already built libffi 3.0.9 and put it into testing I suggest >> you respin the package, we install it on a testing-machine and you >> release it after verification. Then it gets installed on the current* >> machines and you can proceed. Roger: Is this ok for you or do you want to release the build on your own? > OK, I've rebuilt libffi and placed it into my experimental location: > > ls -la /home/experimental/jensd > total 190 > drwxr-xr-x 2 jensd csw 6 Sep 24 17:08 . > drwxrwxrwt 53 web csw 53 Sep 23 10:14 .. > -rw-r--r-- 1 jensd csw 36666 Sep 24 17:08 > libffi-3.0.9,REV=2010.09.24-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > -rw-r--r-- 1 jensd csw 20935 Sep 24 17:08 > libffi-3.0.9,REV=2010.09.24-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > -rw-r--r-- 1 jensd csw 7249 Sep 24 17:08 > libffi_devel-3.0.9,REV=2010.09.24-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz > -rw-r--r-- 1 jensd csw 6839 Sep 24 17:08 > libffi_devel-3.0.9,REV=2010.09.24-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz > > Does this email suffice as a request to have it installed onto a > testing system or do I need to do something else? Nope, this is sufficient (and usually I am faster installing it but you caught me during a mini-vacation with the family...) Done on testing9/10-servers, both sparc and i386. > Also, I don't think my SSH key is on the testing environment as > I was not able to login there. You should be able to hop hover now to testing9s testing9x testing10s testing10x PS: Please don't post to buildfarm-announce@, this is a moderated list for announcements to other projects using the buildfarm, use buildfarm@ instead. Best regards -- Dago From dam at opencsw.org Sun Sep 26 21:31:32 2010 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:31:32 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: current10s and others, c compiler for python development is missing In-Reply-To: <1285424360-sup-4741@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <4C9A8A5B.6040207@kiilerich.com> <994862BA-8BAE-4C74-8F13-F117279CB8B3@opencsw.org> <1285424360-sup-4741@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <60FA185E-A2A5-41F1-A743-821A342716FA@opencsw.org> Hi Rupert, Am 25.09.2010 um 16:19 schrieb Ben Walton: > Excerpts from rupert THURNER's message of Fri Sep 24 17:32:02 -0400 > 2010: > > Hi Rupert, > >> could you please put it on the beuildfarm as well, then we could >> roll the new mercurial release. > > What is the actual package being requested here? Installing now Python packages from http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/experimental.html#maciej to testing9/10* Best regards -- Dago From hson at opencsw.org Mon Sep 27 05:31:17 2010 From: hson at opencsw.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_H=E5kansson?=) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 05:31:17 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Latest libffi/libffidevel on build servers In-Reply-To: <65E0A60E-E424-41F5-9E2E-CBF5A18E6100@opencsw.org> References: <1284766806-sup-3533@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <5DFBCD19-C953-4DB1-8B44-F2AA6803F12D@opencsw.org> <20100924151725.GA17522@bender.opencsw.org> <65E0A60E-E424-41F5-9E2E-CBF5A18E6100@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <4CA01005.3070500@opencsw.org> On 2010-09-26 21:20, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >>> As Roger already built libffi 3.0.9 and put it into testing I suggest >>> you respin the package, we install it on a testing-machine and you >>> release it after verification. Then it gets installed on the current* >>> machines and you can proceed. > > Roger: Is this ok for you or do you want to release the build on your own? It's ok for me From rupert at opencsw.org Thu Sep 30 21:47:31 2010 From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:47:31 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: current10s and others, c compiler for python development is missing In-Reply-To: <60FA185E-A2A5-41F1-A743-821A342716FA@opencsw.org> References: <4C9A8A5B.6040207@kiilerich.com> <994862BA-8BAE-4C74-8F13-F117279CB8B3@opencsw.org> <1285424360-sup-4741@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <60FA185E-A2A5-41F1-A743-821A342716FA@opencsw.org> Message-ID: many thanks! the package gets now the error: CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWmercurial += missing-dependency|CSWlibpython26 Please note that checkpkg isn't suggesting you should simply add these overrides do the Makefile. It only informs what the overrides could look like. You need to understand what are the reported issues about and use your best judgement to decide whether to fix the underlying problems or override them. For more information, scroll up and read the detailed messages. ERROR: Modular checks are reporting errors. even if the makefile includes: CATEGORIES = python is this in gar or should we change the python packages? rupert. On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 21:31, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Rupert, > > Am 25.09.2010 um 16:19 schrieb Ben Walton: >> >> Excerpts from rupert THURNER's message of Fri Sep 24 17:32:02 -0400 2010: >> >> Hi Rupert, >> >>> could you please put it on the beuildfarm as well, then we could >>> roll the new mercurial release. >> >> What is the actual package being requested here? > > Installing now Python packages from > ?http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/experimental.html#maciej > to testing9/10* > > > Best regards > > ?-- Dago > > From rupert at opencsw.org Thu Sep 30 21:48:32 2010 From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:48:32 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: current10s and others, c compiler for python development is missing In-Reply-To: References: <4C9A8A5B.6040207@kiilerich.com> <994862BA-8BAE-4C74-8F13-F117279CB8B3@opencsw.org> <1285424360-sup-4741@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <60FA185E-A2A5-41F1-A743-821A342716FA@opencsw.org> Message-ID: uhm ... the below should read: "change the python based packages" of course. On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 21:47, rupert THURNER wrote: > many thanks! the package gets now the error: > > CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWmercurial += missing-dependency|CSWlibpython26 > Please note that checkpkg isn't suggesting you should simply add these overrides > do the Makefile. ?It only informs what the overrides could look like. ?You need > to understand what are the reported issues about and use your best judgement to > decide whether to fix the underlying problems or override them. For more > information, scroll up and read the detailed messages. > ERROR: Modular checks are reporting errors. > > even if the makefile includes: > CATEGORIES = python > > is this in gar or should we change the python packages? > > rupert. > > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 21:31, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Hi Rupert, >> >> Am 25.09.2010 um 16:19 schrieb Ben Walton: >>> >>> Excerpts from rupert THURNER's message of Fri Sep 24 17:32:02 -0400 2010: >>> >>> Hi Rupert, >>> >>>> could you please put it on the beuildfarm as well, then we could >>>> roll the new mercurial release. >>> >>> What is the actual package being requested here? >> >> Installing now Python packages from >> ?http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/experimental.html#maciej >> to testing9/10* >> >> >> Best regards >> >> ?-- Dago >> >> > From maciej at opencsw.org Thu Sep 30 21:54:22 2010 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:54:22 -0700 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: current10s and others, c compiler for python development is missing In-Reply-To: References: <4C9A8A5B.6040207@kiilerich.com> <994862BA-8BAE-4C74-8F13-F117279CB8B3@opencsw.org> <1285424360-sup-4741@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <60FA185E-A2A5-41F1-A743-821A342716FA@opencsw.org> Message-ID: No dia 30 de Setembro de 2010 12:48, rupert THURNER escreveu: > uhm ... the below should read: > "change the python based packages" of course. > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 21:47, rupert THURNER wrote: >> many thanks! the package gets now the error: >> >> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWmercurial += missing-dependency|CSWlibpython26 This package hasn't been released. If you build on current9{s,x}, you shouldn't get this message. The CSWlibpython26 was something I was fiddling with lately, and I only put it into the experimental catalog, without installing it anywhere.