From ellson at opencsw.org  Wed Jun  1 16:15:11 2011
From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson)
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:15:11 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: graphviz: problem analysis and buildfarm
	request.
Message-ID: <4DE6496F.4010407@opencsw.org>

[ Too many lists :-( ]

Could you please uninstall all graphviz packages from the build hosts
for a while?

John

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	graphviz: problem analysis and buildfarm request.
Date: 	Wed, 01 Jun 2011 09:01:35 -0400
From: 	John Ellson <ellson at opencsw.org>
To: 	devel at lists.opencsw.org



Request first:

    Would it be possible to uninstall all earlier versions of the 
graphviz packages on the buildhosts, perhaps just for a few days while I 
build the graphviz-2.28.0 packages?



Problem analysis.

    The most recent attempt to package graphviz-2.28.0 failed because 
of a libtool problem.

    During "make install", libtool relinks libraries against the final 
installation location.   But the dependent libraries from the graphviz 
packages haven't yet been installed yet, so libtool picks up the old 
libraries incorrectly.

    In fact the libtool manual 
<http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/html_node/Install-mode.html> 
states:

        "Currently it is not generally possible to install into a 
temporary staging area that contains needed third-party libraries which 
are not yet visible at their final location."

    and yet, the earlier release built ok, so my working theory is that 
it won't add incorrect libraries during the relink if they don't exist 
at all.


John

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20110601/97ebe97d/attachment.html>

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Wed Jun  1 16:46:16 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:46:16 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] sudoers permissions on test9s
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikvM2Z7djO1-qG74pPi3FGkmO+sqQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTikvM2Z7djO1-qG74pPi3FGkmO+sqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1306939551-sup-4711@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Maciej Blizi?ski's message of Tue May 31 16:35:45 -0400 2011:

Hi Dago,

> There seems to be a problem with sudoers permissions on test9s:
> 
> maciej at testing9s :~ > sudo echo
> sudo: /opt/csw/etc/sudoers is mode 0640, should be 0440
> sudo: no valid sudoers sources found, quitting

As I rely on sudo as well, this fix must be done by you.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From maciej at opencsw.org  Wed Jun  1 16:45:53 2011
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:45:53 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Test zone access for John Ellson
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinLgomT0PG-uP3bjrJ9eSO_CtNT=A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTinLgomT0PG-uP3bjrJ9eSO_CtNT=A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=LGOhj-F_cj8c+zW_VTWq3Pz8nBQ@mail.gmail.com>

To follow up on that, I can install the packages for John, but we need
to get sudoers fixed.  I think that it's Dago who has to handle that,
because others rely on working sudo.

Maciej


From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Jun  1 23:03:59 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:03:59 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Test zone access for John Ellson
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=LGOhj-F_cj8c+zW_VTWq3Pz8nBQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTinLgomT0PG-uP3bjrJ9eSO_CtNT=A@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=LGOhj-F_cj8c+zW_VTWq3Pz8nBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3EF36805-8CC4-4C45-8086-C49D4A860B64@opencsw.org>

Hi folks,

Am 01.06.2011 um 16:45 schrieb Maciej Blizi?ski:
> To follow up on that, I can install the packages for John, but we need
> to get sudoers fixed.  I think that it's Dago who has to handle that,
> because others rely on working sudo.

Fixed. BTW, to give someone root access just add him to "wheel" as secondary
group.

I currently driving around a lot, feel free to ping me directly (best is irc)
to get something done quickly.


Best regards

  -- Dago


-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896



From ja at opencsw.org  Thu Jun  2 10:22:16 2011
From: ja at opencsw.org (Juergen Arndt)
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:22:16 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install CSWlibnspr4
Message-ID: <7CDB44A5-E199-4D08-994A-D71EE08E3F44@opencsw.org>

Hi all,

could you please install the package CSWlibnspr4. It is needed for compiling zabbix.

Thank you!

Regards
Juergen

-- 
Juergen Arndt



From ellson at opencsw.org  Thu Jun  2 16:47:45 2011
From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson)
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:47:45 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] buildfarm request: please uninstall graphvizdevel
Message-ID: <4DE7A291.9070608@opencsw.org>

Perhaps a simpler change will do it.

Could you uninstall just the "graphvizdevel" package on the build hosts
for long enough for me to try building graphviz-2.28 again ?

Thanks


John



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Fwd: graphviz: problem analysis and buildfarm request.
Date: 	Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:15:11 -0400
From: 	John Ellson <ellson at opencsw.org>
To: 	buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org



[ Too many lists :-( ]

Could you please uninstall all graphviz packages from the build hosts
for a while?

John

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	graphviz: problem analysis and buildfarm request.
Date: 	Wed, 01 Jun 2011 09:01:35 -0400
From: 	John Ellson <ellson at opencsw.org>
To: 	devel at lists.opencsw.org



Request first:

    Would it be possible to uninstall all earlier versions of the 
graphviz packages on the buildhosts, perhaps just for a few days while I 
build the graphviz-2.28.0 packages?



Problem analysis.

    The most recent attempt to package graphviz-2.28.0 failed because 
of a libtool problem.

    During "make install", libtool relinks libraries against the final 
installation location.   But the dependent libraries from the graphviz 
packages haven't yet been installed yet, so libtool picks up the old 
libraries incorrectly.

    In fact the libtool manual 
<http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/html_node/Install-mode.html> 
states:

        "Currently it is not generally possible to install into a 
temporary staging area that contains needed third-party libraries which 
are not yet visible at their final location."

    and yet, the earlier release built ok, so my working theory is that 
it won't add incorrect libraries during the relink if they don't exist 
at all.


John

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20110602/d833ebf2/attachment.html>

From bwalton at opencsw.org  Thu Jun  2 17:06:53 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:06:53 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install CSWlibnspr4
In-Reply-To: <7CDB44A5-E199-4D08-994A-D71EE08E3F44@opencsw.org>
References: <7CDB44A5-E199-4D08-994A-D71EE08E3F44@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <1307027144-sup-4030@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Juergen Arndt's message of Thu Jun 02 04:22:16 -0400 2011:

[+maintainers]

Hi Juergen,

> could you please install the package CSWlibnspr4. It is needed for
> compiling zabbix.

Solving needed dependencies ...
Package CSWlibnspr4 not in catalog. Exiting.

Not sure what's up.  The package is listed at opencsw.org/packages/...

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From bwalton at opencsw.org  Thu Jun  2 17:08:26 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:08:26 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] buildfarm request: please uninstall
	graphvizdevel
In-Reply-To: <4DE7A291.9070608@opencsw.org>
References: <4DE7A291.9070608@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <1307027288-sup-9851@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from John Ellson's message of Thu Jun 02 10:47:45 -0400 2011:

Hi John,

> Could you uninstall just the "graphvizdevel" package on the build
> hosts for long enough for me to try building graphviz-2.28 again ?

This is for the current* boxes?

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From maciej at opencsw.org  Thu Jun  2 17:22:49 2011
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:22:49 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers]  Please install CSWlibnspr4
In-Reply-To: <1307027144-sup-4030@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <7CDB44A5-E199-4D08-994A-D71EE08E3F44@opencsw.org>
	<1307027144-sup-4030@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <BANLkTiks1ti2pPeQuBeFs8G8_xdHtZfsVg@mail.gmail.com>

2011/6/2 Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org>:
> [+maintainers]
>
> Hi Juergen,
>
>> could you please install the package CSWlibnspr4. It is needed for
>> compiling zabbix.
>
> Solving needed dependencies ...
> Package CSWlibnspr4 not in catalog. Exiting.
>
> Not sure what's up. ?The package is listed at opencsw.org/packages/...

There is an older version of the nspr package in the catalog.  The
updated version has not been released because of a file conflict with
CSWmozilla (although the current package conflicts with it as well, as
far as I remember).

Maciej


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Thu Jun  2 19:47:39 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:47:39 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] buildfarm request: please uninstall
	graphvizdevel
In-Reply-To: <4DE7C264.4000604@opencsw.org>
References: <4DE7A291.9070608@opencsw.org>
	<1307027288-sup-9851@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<4DE7C264.4000604@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <1307036837-sup-9492@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from John Ellson's message of Thu Jun 02 13:03:32 -0400 2011:

Hi John,

> Yes please.

Removing CSWgraphvizdevel now.

-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From ellson at opencsw.org  Fri Jun  3 00:38:24 2011
From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson)
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:38:24 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Request for graphviz-2.28.0 install on current*
 (was Fwd: Re: [csw-maintainers] graphviz: pushed to unstable - problem
 analysis, solution, and next issue
Message-ID: <4DE810E0.4050502@opencsw.org>

OK, I'm going to try rebuilding ImageMagick against graphviz-2.28.0 for
a simultaneous release.

On the current* build hosts, could you please:

    Uninstall graphviz*-2.26.3 and ImageMagick

    Install graphviz-2.28.0 and graphvizdevel-2.28.0 from the unstable
catalog.

Thanks.

John

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: [csw-maintainers] graphviz: pushed to unstable - problem
analysis, solution, and next issue
Date: 	Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:08:27 -0700
From: 	Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com>
Reply-To: 	List for OpenCSW maintainers <maintainers at lists.opencsw.org>
To: 	List for OpenCSW maintainers <maintainers at lists.opencsw.org>



On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:05 PM, John Ellson <ellson at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Dago,
>
> This really sounds like a lot of work for a one-time problem.
>
> Is there an alternative?    Could graphviz-2.28.0 be installed on the
> current build hosts and then ImageMagic rebuilt for a simultaneous release?
>

that is certainly an even better solution, if there is nothing else
depending on the older libraries.
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
maintainers at lists.opencsw.org
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
.:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20110602/bfbcbb1e/attachment.html>

From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Jun  3 18:04:45 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:04:45 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Rebuild of imagemagick
In-Reply-To: <4DE810E0.4050502@opencsw.org>
References: <4DE810E0.4050502@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <7DAE16D0-33E8-45DE-A387-0B1F09925429@opencsw.org>

Hi John,

Am 03.06.2011 um 00:38 schrieb John Ellson:
> OK, I'm going to try rebuilding ImageMagick against graphviz-2.28.0 for a simultaneous release.
> 
> On the current* build hosts, could you please:
> 
>     Uninstall graphviz*-2.26.3 and ImageMagick
> 
>     Install graphviz-2.28.0 and graphvizdevel-2.28.0 from the unstable catalog.

Umh, the usual procedure is to just update unstable and build graphviz there.
I am doing this now, ok?

BTW, Roger had quite some effort in a 64 bit Imagemagick:
  http://wiki.opencsw.org/project-imagemagick64
Maybe we can continue this project and finish up in a joint effort?

Roger: Haven't heard from you in a while, everything ok? :-)


Best regards

  -- Dago

> 
> Thanks.
> 
> John
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:	Re: [csw-maintainers] graphviz: pushed to unstable - problem analysis, solution, and next issue
> Date:	Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:08:27 -0700
> From:	Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com>
> Reply-To:	List for OpenCSW maintainers <maintainers at lists.opencsw.org>
> To:	List for OpenCSW maintainers <maintainers at lists.opencsw.org>
> 
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:05 PM, John Ellson <ellson at opencsw.org> wrote:
> > Dago,
> >
> > This really sounds like a lot of work for a one-time problem.
> >
> > Is there an alternative?    Could graphviz-2.28.0 be installed on the
> > current build hosts and then ImageMagic rebuilt for a simultaneous release?
> >
> 
> that is certainly an even better solution, if there is nothing else
> depending on the older libraries.
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> buildfarm mailing list
> buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/buildfarm

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20110603/0a34d9e6/attachment.html>

From ellson at opencsw.org  Sat Jun  4 19:35:56 2011
From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson)
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 13:35:56 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] pkg-config failure unstable9[xs]
Message-ID: <4DEA6CFC.7060500@opencsw.org>

The ImageMagick builds on unstable9[sx] are failing with:

    libtool: compile:  /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I./config -I/opt/csw/include/freetype2 -I/opt/csw/include -I/opt  
/csw/X11/include -I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/X11/include
-I/opt/csw/include/libxml2 -I/opt/csw/include/lqr-1
-I/opt/csw/include/glib-2.0 -I/opt/csw/lib/glib-2.0/include -xopenmp
-xO3 -m32 -xarch=v8 -D_REENTRANT -c coders/svg.c  -KPIC -DPIC -o
coders/.libs/coders_svg_la-svg.o
    "coders/svg.c", line 93: cannot find include file: "librsvg/rsvg.h"
    "coders/svg.c", line 95: cannot find include file:
"librsvg/rsvg-cairo.h"
    "coders/svg.c", line 97: cannot find include file:
"librsvg/librsvg-features.h"


Is the librvg on unstable9[xs] out of date?   Or possibly pixman?

ellson at unstable9s:ellson> pkg-config --cflags librsvg-2.0
sh: gnome-config: not found
Package pixman-1 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `pixman-1.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
Package 'pixman-1', required by 'cairo', not found

ellson at current9s:ellson> pkg-config --cflags librsvg-2.0
-D_REENTRANT -D_PTHREADS -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -DXTHREADS
-DXUSE_MTSAFE_API -I/opt/csw/include/librsvg-2
-I/opt/csw/include/glib-2.0 -I/opt/csw/lib/glib-2.0/include
-I/opt/csw/include/gtk-2.0 -I/opt/csw/include/cairo
-I/opt/csw/include/pixman-1 -I/opt/csw/include/freetype2
-I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/include/libpng12 


John


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sun Jun  5 02:07:57 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 20:07:57 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] pkg-config failure unstable9[xs]
In-Reply-To: <4DEA6CFC.7060500@opencsw.org>
References: <4DEA6CFC.7060500@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <1307232386-sup-7830@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from John Ellson's message of Sat Jun 04 13:35:56 -0400 2011:

> Is the librvg on unstable9[xs] out of date?   Or possibly pixman?

I just installed CSWlibpixman-dev on the unstable* hosts.  It wasn't
there at all.  That seems to make unstable9x look like current9x.

Let me know if you spot any other issues.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From ellson at opencsw.org  Sun Jun  5 15:30:15 2011
From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson)
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 09:30:15 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] pkg-config failure unstable9[xs]
In-Reply-To: <1307232386-sup-7830@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <4DEA6CFC.7060500@opencsw.org>
	<1307232386-sup-7830@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <4DEB84E7.3030609@opencsw.org>

On 06/04/2011 08:07 PM, Ben Walton wrote:
> I just installed CSWlibpixman-dev on the unstable* hosts.  It wasn't
> there at all.  That seems to make unstable9x look like current9x.

Thanks
> Let me know if you spot any other issues.

I believe the libxml2 package on current9[xs] is newer than on
unstable9[sx] ?
>From diff'ing the two /opt/csw/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlversion.h I get:

< #define LIBXML_DOTTED_VERSION "2.7.8"
---
> #define LIBXML_DOTTED_VERSION "2.7.7"


This is causing some unresolved symbols in ImageMagick.   Could you
update CSWlibxml2 on unstable please?

[ BTW How to I list  the installed package with its package version
number?   "pkg-get -l" just gives me the name ]


I'm also seeing a problem with Undefined symbol:
    XSolarisIASetProcessInfo            /lib/libX11.so.4

Is that something you might recognise?

John



From dam at opencsw.org  Sun Jun  5 15:55:04 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 15:55:04 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] pkg-config failure
	unstable9[xs]
In-Reply-To: <4DEB84E7.3030609@opencsw.org>
References: <4DEA6CFC.7060500@opencsw.org>
	<1307232386-sup-7830@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<4DEB84E7.3030609@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <C7F6352A-BE8D-4109-A924-0E879BE83B3F@opencsw.org>

Hi John,

Am 05.06.2011 um 15:30 schrieb John Ellson:
> On 06/04/2011 08:07 PM, Ben Walton wrote:
>> I just installed CSWlibpixman-dev on the unstable* hosts.  It wasn't
>> there at all.  That seems to make unstable9x look like current9x.
> 
> Thanks
>> Let me know if you spot any other issues.
> 
> I believe the libxml2 package on current9[xs] is newer than on
> unstable9[sx] ?
> From diff'ing the two /opt/csw/include/libxml2/libxml/xmlversion.h I get:
> < #define LIBXML_DOTTED_VERSION "2.7.8"
> ---
>> #define LIBXML_DOTTED_VERSION "2.7.7"
> 
> 
> This is causing some unresolved symbols in ImageMagick.   Could you
> update CSWlibxml2 on unstable please?

This does not look good:

unstable9x# pkgutil -c libxml2
package                   installed                 catalog
CSWlibxml2                2.7.8,REV=2011.03.21      SAME                     
CSWlibxml2-2              2.7.8,REV=2011.03.24      SAME                     
CSWlibxml2devel           2.7.7,REV=2010.04.10      SAME                     

Ben: Would you mind having a look and re-release the devel package?

> [ BTW How to I list  the installed package with its package version
> number?   "pkg-get -l" just gives me the name ]

Try
  pkgutil -c libxml2
as seen above.

> I'm also seeing a problem with Undefined symbol:
>    XSolarisIASetProcessInfo            /lib/libX11.so.4
> 
> Is that something you might recognise?

Yes, these are still artifacts from
  http://wiki.opencsw.org/project-x11
where we tried to build the complete set against an OpenCSW X11. However,
this doesn't prove good and the above error is an indication of mixed
libx11.so.4 and libx11.so.6 linkage. The correct action is to find the
"old" package and rebuild it against SUNW x11.


Best regards

  -- Dago



From ellson at opencsw.org  Sun Jun  5 17:00:41 2011
From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson)
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 11:00:41 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] pkg-config
	failure	unstable9[xs]
In-Reply-To: <C7F6352A-BE8D-4109-A924-0E879BE83B3F@opencsw.org>
References: <4DEA6CFC.7060500@opencsw.org>	<1307232386-sup-7830@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>	<4DEB84E7.3030609@opencsw.org>
	<C7F6352A-BE8D-4109-A924-0E879BE83B3F@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <4DEB9A19.1020403@opencsw.org>

On 06/05/2011 09:55 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>
>> I'm also seeing a problem with Undefined symbol:
>>    XSolarisIASetProcessInfo            /lib/libX11.so.4
>>
>> Is that something you might recognise?
> Yes, these are still artifacts from
>   http://wiki.opencsw.org/project-x11
> where we tried to build the complete set against an OpenCSW X11. However,
> this doesn't prove good and the above error is an indication of mixed
> libx11.so.4 and libx11.so.6 linkage. The correct action is to find the
> "old" package and rebuild it against SUNW x11.


I think I'm seeing the same problem I had with graphviz.   If there are
installed .so for the package from an old installation then libtool
tries to link them into the new build.

I can't find any libX11.so.4 in any products in the build tree, but I do
find it in:
    ellson at unstable9s:lib> ldd libMagick.so.10.0.4 | grep X11
        libX11.so.4 =>   /usr/openwin/lib/libX11.so.4

ImageMagic doesn't have a -devel package, so could you please uninstall
ImageMagic entirely from unstable6[sx]
while I try rebuilding?


John


From ellson at opencsw.org  Sun Jun  5 20:53:08 2011
From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson)
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 14:53:08 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Rebuild of imagemagick
In-Reply-To: <7DAE16D0-33E8-45DE-A387-0B1F09925429@opencsw.org>
References: <4DE810E0.4050502@opencsw.org>
	<7DAE16D0-33E8-45DE-A387-0B1F09925429@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <4DEBD094.9080301@opencsw.org>

On 06/03/2011 12:04 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Am 03.06.2011 um 00:38 schrieb John Ellson:
>> OK, I'm going to try rebuilding ImageMagick against graphviz-2.28.0
>> for a simultaneous release.
>>
>> On the current* build hosts, could you please:
>>
>>     Uninstall graphviz*-2.26.3 and ImageMagick
>>
>>     Install graphviz-2.28.0 and graphvizdevel-2.28.0 from the
>> unstable catalog.
>
> Umh, the usual procedure is to just update unstable and build graphviz
> there.
> I am doing this now, ok?

Unstable is a mess.  Can we go back to plan A (above) ?


Cranky John



>
> BTW, Roger had quite some effort in a 64 bit Imagemagick:
>   http://wiki.opencsw.org/project-imagemagick64
> Maybe we can continue this project and finish up in a joint effort?
>
> Roger: Haven't heard from you in a while, everything ok? :-)
>
>
> Best regards
>
>   -- Dago
>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> John
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: 	Re: [csw-maintainers] graphviz: pushed to unstable -
>> problem analysis, solution, and next issue
>> Date: 	Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:08:27 -0700
>> From: 	Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com>
>> Reply-To: 	List for OpenCSW maintainers <maintainers at lists.opencsw.org>
>> To: 	List for OpenCSW maintainers <maintainers at lists.opencsw.org>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:05 PM, John Ellson <ellson at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> > Dago,
>> >
>> > This really sounds like a lot of work for a one-time problem.
>> >
>> > Is there an alternative?    Could graphviz-2.28.0 be installed on the
>> > current build hosts and then ImageMagic rebuilt for a simultaneous release?
>> >
>>
>> that is certainly an even better solution, if there is nothing else
>> depending on the older libraries.
>> _______________________________________________
>> maintainers mailing list
>> maintainers at lists.opencsw.org
>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>> .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> buildfarm mailing list
>> buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org <mailto:buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org>
>> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/buildfarm
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20110605/40d04912/attachment.html>

From maciej at opencsw.org  Mon Jun  6 02:58:50 2011
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 01:58:50 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] Rebuild of imagemagick
In-Reply-To: <4DEBD094.9080301@opencsw.org>
References: <4DE810E0.4050502@opencsw.org>
	<7DAE16D0-33E8-45DE-A387-0B1F09925429@opencsw.org>
	<4DEBD094.9080301@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=w_pdNhHscsYoSrebRSg32E814k_YCtKroi2-x3866yw@mail.gmail.com>

2011/6/5 John Ellson <ellson at opencsw.org>
>
> Unstable is a mess.

In what way?  I am aware of the X11 libraries that need to be removed.
Is there anything else?

Maciej


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Mon Jun  6 04:45:47 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 22:45:47 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] pkg-config failure
	unstable9[xs]
In-Reply-To: <C7F6352A-BE8D-4109-A924-0E879BE83B3F@opencsw.org>
References: <4DEA6CFC.7060500@opencsw.org>
	<1307232386-sup-7830@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<4DEB84E7.3030609@opencsw.org>
	<C7F6352A-BE8D-4109-A924-0E879BE83B3F@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <1307328323-sup-2858@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Dagobert Michelsen's message of Sun Jun 05 09:55:04 -0400 2011:

> Ben: Would you mind having a look and re-release the devel package?

Done.  The unstable* hosts were updated too.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From phil at bolthole.com  Mon Jun  6 05:36:19 2011
From: phil at bolthole.com (Philip Brown)
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 20:36:19 -0700
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] Rebuild of imagemagick
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=w_pdNhHscsYoSrebRSg32E814k_YCtKroi2-x3866yw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4DE810E0.4050502@opencsw.org>
	<7DAE16D0-33E8-45DE-A387-0B1F09925429@opencsw.org>
	<4DEBD094.9080301@opencsw.org>
	<BANLkTi=w_pdNhHscsYoSrebRSg32E814k_YCtKroi2-x3866yw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=0Ep_vZXzRZWo27BRCTxTWYO=vDg@mail.gmail.com>

John has made a reasonable request to the buildfarm maintainers. twice now.

Are you folks going to ignore buildfarm requests for the
non-"unstable" machines now?


From ellson at opencsw.org  Mon Jun  6 12:17:57 2011
From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson)
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 06:17:57 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] graphviz builds - build farm requests
Message-ID: <4DECA955.9020408@opencsw.org>

I see graphvizdevel installed on unstable9s, but that imagemagick is
still installed.  How did that happen?  I thought there was a dependency
from imagemagick on libgvc.so from graphviz-2.26.3 ?   Doesn't pkg-get
or pkgutil check?

1) Could you install graphvizdevel on unstable9x as well?  (I only have
resources for testing on i386 architecture here).

2) Please uninstall  imagemagick from unstable9[sx] while I rebuild.   I
still think libtool gets confused if old copies of the package's .so are
still installed. I currently get this error when building imagemagick on
unstable8s I think because its picking up the old libs.


libtool: link:  /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -G -z defs -M
coders/.libs/svg.so.exp -h svg.so -o coders/.libs/svg.so 
coders/.libs/coders_svg_la-svg.o  
-R/home/ellson/mgar/pkg/ImageMagick/trunk/work/solaris9-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/ImageMagick-6.6.0-9/magick/.libs
-R/home/ellson/mgar/pkg/ImageMagick/trunk/work/solaris9-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/ImageMagick-6.6.0-9/wand/.libs
-R/opt/csw/lib -R/opt/csw/X11/lib
-L/home/ellson/mgar/pkg/ImageMagick/trunk/work/solaris9-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/ImageMagick-6.6.0-9/magick/.libs
-L/home/ellson/mgar/pkg/ImageMagick/trunk/work/solaris9-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/ImageMagick-6.6.0-9/wand/.libs
-L/opt/csw/X11/lib -L/opt/csw/lib magick/.libs/libMagickCore.so
wand/.libs/libMagickWand.so
/home/ellson/mgar/pkg/ImageMagick/trunk/work/solaris9-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/ImageMagick-6.6.0-9/magick/.libs/libMagickCore.so
-llcms -ltiff -lfreetype -ljpeg -llqr-1 -lfontconfig -lXext -lXt -lbz2
-lltdl -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lsocket -lnsl -lmtsk -lrsvg-2 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0
-lcairo -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lpthread -lthread
-lrt -lglib-2.0 -lintl -lxml2 -lz -lm -lc  -m32 -xarch=v8 -Wl,-zlazyload
-m32 -xarch=v8 
ld: warning: file
/home/ellson/mgar/pkg/ImageMagick/trunk/work/solaris9-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8/ImageMagick-6.6.0-9/magick/.libs/libMagickCore.so:
linked to magick/.libs/libMagickCore.so: attempted multiple inclusion of
file
Undefined                       first referenced
 symbol                             in file
XSolarisIASetProcessInfo            /lib/libX11.so.4
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to
coders/.libs/svg.so
gmake[3]: *** [coders/svg.la] Error 1




After I get imagemagick to build and package on unstable9[sx], do I
still need to build and package on current9[sx] ?

John




From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Jun  6 14:03:57 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 14:03:57 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] graphviz builds - build farm
	requests
In-Reply-To: <4DECA955.9020408@opencsw.org>
References: <4DECA955.9020408@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <8B671369-C08D-4EFA-A109-FC5EEF4C1ED4@opencsw.org>

Hi John,

Am 06.06.2011 um 12:17 schrieb John Ellson:
> I see graphvizdevel installed on unstable9s, but that imagemagick is
> still installed.  How did that happen?

I would say this is normal as CSWimagemagick depends on CSWgraphviz, but not
CSWgraphvizdevel.

> I thought there was a dependency
> from imagemagick on libgvc.so from graphviz-2.26.3 ?   Doesn't pkg-get
> or pkgutil check?

They check explicit package dependencies when set, but the dependency is
more defined as above.

> 1) Could you install graphvizdevel on unstable9x as well?  (I only have
> resources for testing on i386 architecture here).

I have uninstalled CSWgraphvizdevel on all unstable* hosts now.

> 2) Please uninstall  imagemagick from unstable9[sx] while I rebuild.

Uninstalled from all unstable* hosts.

> After I get imagemagick to build and package on unstable9[sx], do I
> still need to build and package on current9[sx] ?

It is recommended ATM, but if you make sure that it works with the versions
in current a direct release to unstable should be no problem.


Best regards

  -- Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896



From ellson at opencsw.org  Mon Jun  6 20:46:46 2011
From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson)
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 14:46:46 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] request for packages on unstable9[sx]
Message-ID: <4DED2096.4020607@opencsw.org>

I'm going backwards, and accelerating :-(

The ImageMagic build is failing with:
    Undefined                       first referenced
       symbol                             in file
    XSolarisIASetProcessInfo            /lib/libX11.so.4


I believe the reference is coming from librsvg-2.so, so I'm trying to
repackage that.  

                      
Request:    Please install: CSWmozilla on unstable9[sx] for librsvg rebuild.




From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Jun  6 21:32:55 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 21:32:55 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] request for packages on unstable9[sx]
In-Reply-To: <4DED2096.4020607@opencsw.org>
References: <4DED2096.4020607@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <A99605BD-75FD-4796-A337-D41693CD0312@opencsw.org>

Hi John,

Am 06.06.2011 um 20:46 schrieb John Ellson:
> I'm going backwards, and accelerating :-(
> 
> The ImageMagic build is failing with:
>    Undefined                       first referenced
>       symbol                             in file
>    XSolarisIASetProcessInfo            /lib/libX11.so.4
> 
> I believe the reference is coming from librsvg-2.so, so I'm trying to
> repackage that.  

I don't think so, as "ldd -r librsvg-2.so" does not link to libX11.so.6.
The linkage to libX11.so.4 is the correct one. The error is caused by applications
being linked to libX11.so.6 which however pull in libX11.so.4 earlier by another
dependency.

> Request:    Please install: CSWmozilla on unstable9[sx] for librsvg rebuild.

Apart from the above comment I cannot see CSWmozilla as a dependency on
  http://www.opencsw.org/package/librsvg/

John, from my impression you are moving too fast shooting at everything that
doesn't immediately jump away :-) I suggest you come over to #opencsw so we
can investigate the problem ground up logically.


Best regards

  -- Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896



From bwalton at opencsw.org  Tue Jun  7 03:10:32 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:10:32 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] buildfarm request summary
Message-ID: <1307408906-sup-7733@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>


Hi John,

Conspiracy theories aside, I got lost with all of your email requests
yesterday.  I only had a brief amount of time at the end of the day
and was tired and getting sick.  If you wouldn't mind, could you
summarize any outstanding requests for buildfarm admin in a single
mail please?  If you could split it out between current and unstable
and then further for adds and removes, that would greatly help me.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From ellson at opencsw.org  Tue Jun  7 11:48:25 2011
From: ellson at opencsw.org (John Ellson)
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 05:48:25 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] buildfarm request summary
In-Reply-To: <1307408906-sup-7733@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <1307408906-sup-7733@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <4DEDF3E9.3010001@opencsw.org>

Ben,

No problem.  Requests considered reset.

I think Dago yesterday took care of the updates needed  for ImageMagick
builds on unstable9[sx]

Thanks

John



On 06/06/2011 09:10 PM, Ben Walton wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Conspiracy theories aside, I got lost with all of your email requests
> yesterday.  I only had a brief amount of time at the end of the day
> and was tired and getting sick.  If you wouldn't mind, could you
> summarize any outstanding requests for buildfarm admin in a single
> mail please?  If you could split it out between current and unstable
> and then further for adds and removes, that would greatly help me.
>
> Thanks
> -Ben
> --
> Ben Walton
> Systems Programmer - CHASS
> University of Toronto
> C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302
>



From maciej at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 13 07:24:25 2011
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 06:24:25 +0100
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] eventlog upgrade
Message-ID: <BANLkTikKxVO8=o1y=Pe8FV9gKHwrYeoKdw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Can you upgrade eventlog on the unstable hosts?

Maciej


From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 13 08:29:42 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:29:42 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] eventlog upgrade
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikKxVO8=o1y=Pe8FV9gKHwrYeoKdw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTikKxVO8=o1y=Pe8FV9gKHwrYeoKdw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1B5ECDE7-6E79-4E82-A4F2-36EE2E8CAABB@opencsw.org>

Hi Maciej,

Am 13.06.2011 um 07:24 schrieb Maciej Blizi?ski:
> Can you upgrade eventlog on the unstable hosts?

Done.


Best regards

  -- Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896



From skayser at opencsw.org  Sun Jun 19 02:27:50 2011
From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser)
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 02:27:50 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install py_crypto. TIA!
Message-ID: <20110619002750.GA25705@sebastiankayser.de>

Hi,

can this please be installed on the buildfarm. Thanks!

Sebastian

----- Forwarded message from Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> -----

Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 14:46:31 -0700
From: Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com>
To: pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
Subject: Re: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs py_crypto

batched

On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Sebastian Kayser <skayser at opencsw.org> wrote:
> * py_crypto: new package
> ?+ py_crypto-2.3,REV=2011.06.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
> ?+ py_crypto-2.3,REV=2011.06.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> --
> Generated by submitpkg
> _______________________________________________
> pkgsubmissions mailing list
> pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions
>
_______________________________________________
pkgsubmissions mailing list
pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/pkgsubmissions

----- End forwarded message -----


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sun Jun 19 04:24:03 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:24:03 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install py_crypto. TIA!
In-Reply-To: <20110619002750.GA25705@sebastiankayser.de>
References: <20110619002750.GA25705@sebastiankayser.de>
Message-ID: <1308450211-sup-6682@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Sebastian Kayser's message of Sat Jun 18 20:27:50 -0400 2011:

Hi Sebastian,

> can this please be installed on the buildfarm. Thanks!

As soon as I see it hit the mirrors I'll process it for you.  Dago
might catch it overnight (mine) though...?

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From skayser at opencsw.org  Mon Jun 20 22:16:24 2011
From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser)
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:16:24 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install py_crypto. TIA!
In-Reply-To: <1308450211-sup-6682@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <20110619002750.GA25705@sebastiankayser.de>
	<1308450211-sup-6682@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <20110620201624.GF25705@sebastiankayser.de>

* Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Excerpts from Sebastian Kayser's message of Sat Jun 18 20:27:50 -0400 2011:
> > can this please be installed on the buildfarm. Thanks!
> 
> As soon as I see it hit the mirrors I'll process it for you.  Dago
> might catch it overnight (mine) though...?

Now available. Go go go! ;)

Sebastian


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Tue Jun 21 01:47:17 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:47:17 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install py_crypto. TIA!
In-Reply-To: <20110620201624.GF25705@sebastiankayser.de>
References: <20110619002750.GA25705@sebastiankayser.de>
	<1308450211-sup-6682@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
	<20110620201624.GF25705@sebastiankayser.de>
Message-ID: <1308613627-sup-7052@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Sebastian Kayser's message of Mon Jun 20 16:16:24 -0400 2011:

> Now available. Go go go! ;)

Done!

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From skayser at opencsw.org  Wed Jun 22 17:04:37 2011
From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser)
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:04:37 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install: py_paramiko. TIA! (eom)
Message-ID: <201106221504.p5MF4bMF028075@login.bo.opencsw.org>

Sebastian


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Wed Jun 22 17:39:50 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:39:50 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install: py_paramiko. TIA! (eom)
In-Reply-To: <201106221504.p5MF4bMF028075@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201106221504.p5MF4bMF028075@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <1308757182-sup-1810@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Sebastian Kayser's message of Wed Jun 22 11:04:37 -0400 2011:

In progress.

-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From skayser at opencsw.org  Sat Jun 25 23:43:37 2011
From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser)
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 23:43:37 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install: mgar.
Message-ID: <201106252143.p5PLhbBs028498@login.bo.opencsw.org>

I'd like it to be easily available for Rupert (and Dago of course) to
test drive. Thanks!

Sebastian


From bwalton at opencsw.org  Sun Jun 26 05:05:17 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 23:05:17 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install: mgar.
In-Reply-To: <201106252143.p5PLhbBs028498@login.bo.opencsw.org>
References: <201106252143.p5PLhbBs028498@login.bo.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <1309057502-sup-1701@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from Sebastian Kayser's message of Sat Jun 25 17:43:37 -0400 2011:
> I'd like it to be easily available for Rupert (and Dago of course) to
> test drive. Thanks!

Doing this now.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From rupert at opencsw.org  Tue Jun 28 06:33:11 2011
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 06:33:11 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] git upgrade?
Message-ID: <BANLkTikQ2=2KkEfJGH7dv7TuDQ54B-HHSA@mail.gmail.com>

hi,

did anybody upgrade git on the buildfarm? i run update with the following
result:

$ git svn rebase
Unable to determine upstream SVN information from working tree history

unfortunately my terminal died when i saw this message the first time and i
can only remeber it vaguely saying "upgrading svn to v2, folder .git/svn"
beforehand. i am not sure what the reason is, but it looks like a git bug.

rupert.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20110628/95164535/attachment.html>

From bonivart at opencsw.org  Tue Jun 28 21:00:27 2011
From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart)
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:00:27 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please remove CSWclamav and CSWlibclam6 from
	unstable build hosts
Message-ID: <BANLkTimARXhWeTdG2YfSVCqVY7yPsBr22g@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks.

/peter


From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Jun 28 22:57:40 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:57:40 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please remove CSWclamav and CSWlibclam6 from
	unstable build hosts
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimARXhWeTdG2YfSVCqVY7yPsBr22g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTimARXhWeTdG2YfSVCqVY7yPsBr22g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6E93192B-B350-483C-9E9B-1510E41726F5@opencsw.org>

Hi Peter,

Am 28.06.2011 um 21:00 schrieb Peter Bonivart:
> Please remove CSWclamav and CSWlibclam6 from unstable build hosts

Doing this now.

Best regards

  -- Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896



From bwalton at opencsw.org  Wed Jun 29 02:51:19 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 20:51:19 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] git upgrade?
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikQ2=2KkEfJGH7dv7TuDQ54B-HHSA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTikQ2=2KkEfJGH7dv7TuDQ54B-HHSA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1309308656-sup-9114@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from rupert THURNER's message of Tue Jun 28 00:33:11 -0400 2011:

Hi Rupert,

> did anybody upgrade git on the buildfarm? i run update with the following
> result:

Not to my knowledge.  I'll try update it now.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From bwalton at opencsw.org  Wed Jun 29 02:53:52 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 20:53:52 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] git upgrade?
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikQ2=2KkEfJGH7dv7TuDQ54B-HHSA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTikQ2=2KkEfJGH7dv7TuDQ54B-HHSA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1309308809-sup-2237@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>

Excerpts from rupert THURNER's message of Tue Jun 28 00:33:11 -0400 2011:

Hi Rupert,

> did anybody upgrade git on the buildfarm? i run update with the following
> result:

Actually, it was updated...

> $ git svn rebase
> Unable to determine upstream SVN information from working tree history
> 
> unfortunately my terminal died when i saw this message the first time and i
> can only remeber it vaguely saying "upgrading svn to v2, folder .git/svn"
> beforehand. i am not sure what the reason is, but it looks like a
> git bug.

Is it reproducible?

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From bwalton at opencsw.org  Wed Jun 29 03:37:39 2011
From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton)
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:37:39 -0400
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] installing zsh on login
Message-ID: <1309311446-sup-7346@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>


Hi Dago,

FYI, I'm adding CSWzsh to login.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302



From rupert at opencsw.org  Wed Jun 29 04:24:14 2011
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 04:24:14 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] git upgrade?
In-Reply-To: <1309308809-sup-2237@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <BANLkTikQ2=2KkEfJGH7dv7TuDQ54B-HHSA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1309308809-sup-2237@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <BANLkTikdYVwJ6tPHqyQ2bHUPNkznTkDfZQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 02:53, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:

> Excerpts from rupert THURNER's message of Tue Jun 28 00:33:11 -0400 2011:
>
> Hi Rupert,
>
> > did anybody upgrade git on the buildfarm? i run update with the following
> > result:
>
> Actually, it was updated...
>
> > $ git svn rebase
> > Unable to determine upstream SVN information from working tree history
> >
> > unfortunately my terminal died when i saw this message the first time and
> i
> > can only remeber it vaguely saying "upgrading svn to v2, folder .git/svn"
> > beforehand. i am not sure what the reason is, but it looks like a
> > git bug.
>
> Is it reproducible?
>
>
yes, it happened on all directories used to sync sourceforge to github, i.e.
 ~rupert/git-experimental. usually no problem ... the only one which
disturbs a little is the one created in 9 hours :)

rupert.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/attachments/20110629/f7487381/attachment.html>

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Jun 29 07:54:29 2011
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 07:54:29 +0200
Subject: [csw-buildfarm] git upgrade?
In-Reply-To: <1309308809-sup-2237@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
References: <BANLkTikQ2=2KkEfJGH7dv7TuDQ54B-HHSA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1309308809-sup-2237@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: <0B572259-C5E6-4191-8891-FD002FAB61A0@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 29.06.2011 um 02:53 schrieb Ben Walton:
> Excerpts from rupert THURNER's message of Tue Jun 28 00:33:11 -0400 2011:
>> did anybody upgrade git on the buildfarm? i run update with the following
>> result:
> 
> Actually, it was updated...

Yes, I update the hosts from time to time.


Best regards

  -- Dago