From maciej at opencsw.org Fri Sep 2 03:07:54 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 02:07:54 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] =?utf-8?q?opencsw-future_=E2=86=92_opencsw_is_in_?= =?utf-8?q?flight?= Message-ID: I've initiated the work to promote opencsw-future to opencsw. I'm running the main script in the foreground, so I see any issues that might come up in the process. I've temporarily disabled the cron job, so it doesn't get in the way. Maciej From maciej at opencsw.org Fri Sep 2 03:22:50 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 02:22:50 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] =?utf-8?q?opencsw-future_=E2=86=92_opencsw_is_in_?= =?utf-8?q?flight?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I only have the access with the 'mirror' account, which doesn't have the right to write to the official mirror: bash-3.00$ ls -l csw total 3801 -rw-r--r-- 1 phil staff 2784 Jan 28 2010 README drwxrwxr-x 4 phil csw 4 Jul 3 05:52 current -rw-r--r-- 1 phil staff 88064 Oct 2 2009 pkg_get.pkg -rw-r--r-- 1 phil staff 304128 Sep 6 2010 pkgutil-i386.pkg -rw-r--r-- 1 phil staff 364032 Sep 6 2010 pkgutil-sparc.pkg drwxr-xr-x 4 phil staff 4 Oct 24 2008 stable lrwxrwxrwx 1 phil staff 7 Sep 13 2010 unstable -> current -rwxr-xr-x 1 phil staff 164576 Nov 18 2002 wget-i386 -rwxr-xr-x 1 phil staff 164576 Nov 18 2002 wget-i386.bin -rwxr-xr-x 1 phil staff 224672 Nov 18 2002 wget-sparc -rwxr-xr-x 1 phil staff 224672 Nov 18 2002 wget-sparc.bin Can I get these rights? (or chown mirror /csw/rsync/csw) Maciej From i.galic at brainsware.org Sun Sep 4 13:41:31 2011 From: i.galic at brainsware.org (Igor =?utf-8?Q?Gali=C4=87?=) Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 11:41:31 -0000 (UTC) Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Cannot csw-upload-pkg Message-ID: <6702cc84-ee0e-49f0-b85f-766f6cb932b9@iris> Hi folks, when trying to upload a package I get this error: WARNING:root:Error reading /etc/opt/csw/releases/auth/igalic: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/etc/opt/csw/releases/auth/igalic' igalic's pkg release password> Is there something I can do to fix this? i -- Igor Gali? Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883 Mail: i.galic at brainsware.org URL: http://brainsware.org/ GPG: 571B 8B8A FC97 266D BDA3 EF6F 43AD 80A4 5779 3257 From i.galic at brainsware.org Sun Sep 4 13:54:31 2011 From: i.galic at brainsware.org (Igor =?utf-8?Q?Gali=C4=87?=) Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 11:54:31 -0000 (UTC) Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Cannot login to testing Message-ID: Hi folks, Recently I sent a mail that I couldn't log-in to unstable, now I seem to have a problem log-in to testing: igalic at login ~ % ssh testing10x Password: 130 igalic at login ~ % ssh testing10s Password: 130 igalic at login ~ % ssh testing9x Password: 130 igalic at login ~ % ssh unstable9x Last login: Sun Sep 4 13:44:59 2011 from login.bo.opencs igalic at unstable9x ~ % Connection to unstable9x closed. igalic at login ~ % ssh unstable9s Last login: Wed Aug 31 20:50:36 2011 from unstable10x.bo. igalic at unstable9s ~ % Connection to unstable9s closed. igalic at login ~ % ssh testing9s Password: 130 igalic at login ~ % ssh testing10s Password: 130 igalic at login ~ % So long, i -- Igor Gali? Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883 Mail: i.galic at brainsware.org URL: http://brainsware.org/ GPG: 571B 8B8A FC97 266D BDA3 EF6F 43AD 80A4 5779 3257 From i.galic at brainsware.org Sun Sep 4 14:45:17 2011 From: i.galic at brainsware.org (Igor =?utf-8?Q?Gali=C4=87?=) Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 12:45:17 -0000 (UTC) Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Cannot csw-upload-pkg In-Reply-To: <6702cc84-ee0e-49f0-b85f-766f6cb932b9@iris> Message-ID: <4ea50aca-4f7f-47b6-9ded-53cab2f6d9df@iris> ----- Original Message ----- > Hi folks, > > when trying to upload a package I get this error: > > > WARNING:root:Error reading /etc/opt/csw/releases/auth/igalic: [Errno > 2] No such file or directory: '/etc/opt/csw/releases/auth/igalic' > igalic's pkg release password> > > Is there something I can do to fix this? Maciej provided the fix 13:49:54 < automaciej> jMCg: right, you haven't got the password set up yet. 13:50:21 < automaciej> let me see if I can do it 13:50:24 < automaciej> (I might not) 13:52:50 < jMCg> automaciej: I already sent a mail to buildfarm@ 13:56:00 < automaciej> jMCg: try now? 13:59:59 < jMCg> automaciej: \o/ So long, i -- Igor Gali? Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883 Mail: i.galic at brainsware.org URL: http://brainsware.org/ GPG: 571B 8B8A FC97 266D BDA3 EF6F 43AD 80A4 5779 3257 From dam at opencsw.org Sun Sep 4 21:22:44 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 21:22:44 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Cannot login to testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Igor, Am 04.09.2011 um 13:54 schrieb Igor Gali?: > Recently I sent a mail that I couldn't log-in to unstable, now I seem to > have a problem log-in to testing: This is normal, as access to the testing hosts is manually added on request if needed. I have added you now for all four hosts. Best regards -- Dago From andreas.enge at inria.fr Wed Sep 7 13:42:26 2011 From: andreas.enge at inria.fr (Andreas Enge) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 13:42:26 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Access to the compile farm for GNU MPC Message-ID: <20110907114226.GB21838@acces5.math.u-bordeaux1.fr> Hello, from time to time, we get a bug report on solaris concerning our package GNU MPC: http://mpc.multiprecision.org/ So it would be nice to get access to your compile farm. One would be enough, but it could be helpful if Paul Zimmermann, the other main author of the package (in cc), could obtain one as well. One question: Do you have any sparc machines, or only x86? GNU MPC is required for compiling GCC, and one of the primary targets of the compiler is sparc-sun-solaris2.10. So it would be optimal to gain access to such a platform. Thank you very much for your help, Andreas From dam at opencsw.org Wed Sep 7 16:34:58 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 16:34:58 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Access to the compile farm for GNU MPC In-Reply-To: <20110907114226.GB21838@acces5.math.u-bordeaux1.fr> References: <20110907114226.GB21838@acces5.math.u-bordeaux1.fr> Message-ID: <27F8220B-8363-47B3-B564-76AF1639F40B@opencsw.org> Hi Andreas, Am 07.09.2011 um 13:42 schrieb Andreas Enge: > from time to time, we get a bug report on solaris concerning our > package GNU MPC: > http://mpc.multiprecision.org/ > So it would be nice to get access to your compile farm. One would be > enough, but it could be helpful if Paul Zimmermann, the other main author > of the package (in cc), could obtain one as well. Sure, I would need your user names and your ssh public keys. Would it be ok to list you and your colleague here? http://www.opencsw.org/extend-it/signup/to-upstream-maintainers/ > One question: Do you have any sparc machines, or only x86? GNU MPC > is required for compiling GCC, and one of the primary targets of > the compiler is sparc-sun-solaris2.10. So it would be optimal to > gain access to such a platform. Yes, we have Solaris 8/9/10 each with both sparc and i386 equipped with available Sun Studio compilers 11/12/12u1/12u2 and GCC 3/4. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From andreas.enge at inria.fr Thu Sep 8 10:03:09 2011 From: andreas.enge at inria.fr (Andreas Enge) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:03:09 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Access to the compile farm for GNU MPC In-Reply-To: <27F8220B-8363-47B3-B564-76AF1639F40B@opencsw.org> References: <20110907114226.GB21838@acces5.math.u-bordeaux1.fr> <27F8220B-8363-47B3-B564-76AF1639F40B@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <20110908080309.GA982@acces5.math.u-bordeaux1.fr> Hallo, On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 04:34:58PM +0200, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Sure, I would need your user names and your ssh public keys. super! Als Benutzernamen h?tten wir gerne zimmerma und enge; die ?ffentlichen Schl?ssel h?nge ich an. > Would it be ok to list you and your colleague here? > http://www.opencsw.org/extend-it/signup/to-upstream-maintainers/ Ja, klar! > Yes, we have Solaris 8/9/10 each with both sparc and i386 equipped with > available Sun Studio compilers 11/12/12u1/12u2 and GCC 3/4. Prima. So viele verschiedene Tests werden wir gar nicht machen k?nnen... Beste Gr??e, Andreas -------------- next part -------------- ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAABIwAAAIEAyGxYTt4GCJsjOetXgT+U2nOjRzKcQWxIKuXHa9UOwmzFZijoxV/Xd6nN2up7wnIqh7K7EJKs8/uxNJ9ypa9CUA0YhkceyF1tatmi7Kl7HqzqjfNOY2ePTaU6dkFwZxYGgaq3dwPFVLZqXVhdD4H1AY1F4dWmmwNADgbCqnRL2Z0= zimmerma at leibniz.loria.fr -------------- next part -------------- ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAADAQABAAABAQCYpyMjRsg9YO/vTwAmYnrODgZh/Ea+ibEfukuW+tXWJojgpkzGwQsanK0jlbQb5XKwKS3SEkR31n2TLJbGojYzNotbqOkYaKcta6HW+aDYJGFe0yg6OoiN1qkq+OaPN07qdPzRsN63QRZPmMPSac+cV9AdqgYGWYh8OyReqGabXpzEt0zNyDwYgcDBKKTEA3Jn7hdU8gXrqd/EQld1vY6I1Z5oean7ZEuNnk4x5McVyaZMZT/F0bXRMfGRngWYq8YkEgN0GFNka/5ojL3rbL6cVnvC5GexGGtTtGKcvWxyY24q78C+Td2hV8x5EM50b26+T40IxcfTj+rmZdRguSH/ andreas.enge at inria.fr From dam at opencsw.org Thu Sep 8 10:27:40 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:27:40 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Access to the compile farm for GNU MPC In-Reply-To: <20110908080309.GA982@acces5.math.u-bordeaux1.fr> References: <20110907114226.GB21838@acces5.math.u-bordeaux1.fr> <27F8220B-8363-47B3-B564-76AF1639F40B@opencsw.org> <20110908080309.GA982@acces5.math.u-bordeaux1.fr> Message-ID: <0ACBA3D2-0E9A-49F7-9E3D-32F5D041FB64@opencsw.org> Hallo Andreas, Am 08.09.2011 um 10:03 schrieb Andreas Enge: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 04:34:58PM +0200, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Sure, I would need your user names and your ssh public keys. > > super! > > Als Benutzernamen h?tten wir gerne zimmerma und enge; die ?ffentlichen > Schl?ssel h?nge ich an. Erledigt: ssh zimmerma at login.opencsw.org ssh enge at login.opencsw.org Bitte als erstes /etc/SETUP lesen, falls was fehlt kannst Du einfach eine Mail schicken :-) Beste Gr??e -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From Paul.Zimmermann at loria.fr Thu Sep 8 10:35:10 2011 From: Paul.Zimmermann at loria.fr (Zimmermann Paul) Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:35:10 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Access to the compile farm for GNU MPC In-Reply-To: <0ACBA3D2-0E9A-49F7-9E3D-32F5D041FB64@opencsw.org> (message from Dagobert Michelsen on Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:27:40 +0200) References: <20110907114226.GB21838@acces5.math.u-bordeaux1.fr> <27F8220B-8363-47B3-B564-76AF1639F40B@opencsw.org> <20110908080309.GA982@acces5.math.u-bordeaux1.fr> <0ACBA3D2-0E9A-49F7-9E3D-32F5D041FB64@opencsw.org> Message-ID: > Erledigt: > ssh zimmerma at login.opencsw.org > ssh enge at login.opencsw.org > > Bitte als erstes /etc/SETUP lesen, falls was fehlt kannst Du einfach eine Mail > schicken :-) vielen Dank! Obwohl my Name Deutsch h?rt, und ich habe 9 Jahre Deutsch in der Schule gelernt, habe ich es lieber auf English sprechen... Paul Zimmermann From maciej at opencsw.org Sat Sep 10 18:54:04 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 17:54:04 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] subversion python bindings not working? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: 2011/7/10 rupert THURNER : > on login.opencsw.org i tried to do: > hg clone https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/subversion/trunk > > and got: > Please install either Subvertpy or the Subversion Python SWIG bindings! > > is this a fault in the subversion package, or the installation on login? Pinging an old thread. Sounds like something for buildfarm at . From maciej at opencsw.org Sun Sep 11 01:22:11 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 00:22:11 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] unstable10x is not responding Message-ID: unstable10x is not responding. Can you take a look? Maciej From info at prolocoarcevia.eu Sun Sep 11 06:18:29 2011 From: info at prolocoarcevia.eu (la proloco di arcevia) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 06:18:29 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] TUTTI AD ARCEVIA il 23-24-25 settembre 2011 Message-ID: <40281908918321042110259@astel-a2008> Arcevia ---- 58? Festa dell' Uva 23 - 24 - 25 Settembre 2011 Con molto piacere ti invitiamo a partecipare alla festa dell'Uva di Arcevia (An) si fa festa................................ si mangia bene....................... si beve quanto basta............... straordinarie attrattive........... divertimento assicurato.......... Stacca la spina e ritorna alle tradizioni. Concediti un fine settimana contro i logorii della vita moderna. Collegamenti per approfondimenti: Arcevia Proloco Brochure Iscriviti'>Confermati nella lista Cancellati'>Cancellati dalla lista Associazione Pro Loco di Arcevia ? piazza Garibaldi 19, 60011 Arcevia (An) c.f. 90003680429 p. iva 01262800426 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bwalton at opencsw.org Sun Sep 11 15:01:34 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 09:01:34 -0400 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] subversion python bindings not working? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1315745947-sup-1652@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski's message of Sat Sep 10 12:54:04 -0400 2011: > 2011/7/10 rupert THURNER : > > on login.opencsw.org i tried to do: hg clone > > https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/subversion/trunk > > > > and got: Please install either Subvertpy or the Subversion Python > > SWIG bindings! > > > > is this a fault in the subversion package, or the installation on > > login? > > Pinging an old thread. Sounds like something for buildfarm at . I'm not sure that either of those packages is available...we have pythonsvn, but I don't think that's the same as subvertpy. Are the swig bindings available? Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From dam at opencsw.org Sun Sep 11 15:20:16 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:20:16 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] subversion python bindings not working? In-Reply-To: <1315745947-sup-1652@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <1315745947-sup-1652@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <2AC685F1-B36D-4694-8082-FB70A5A67F62@opencsw.org> Hi, Am 11.09.2011 um 15:01 schrieb Ben Walton: > Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski's message of Sat Sep 10 12:54:04 -0400 2011: >> 2011/7/10 rupert THURNER : >>> on login.opencsw.org i tried to do: hg clone >>> https://gar.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gar/csw/mgar/pkg/subversion/trunk >>> >>> and got: Please install either Subvertpy or the Subversion Python >>> SWIG bindings! >>> >>> is this a fault in the subversion package, or the installation on >>> login? >> >> Pinging an old thread. Sounds like something for buildfarm at . > > I'm not sure that either of those packages is available...we have > pythonsvn, but I don't think that's the same as subvertpy. Are the > swig bindings available? The issue of Rupert as been fixed a long time ago: http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/2011-July/002164.html Best regards -- Dago From bwalton at opencsw.org Sun Sep 11 15:22:37 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 09:22:37 -0400 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] subversion python bindings not working? In-Reply-To: <2AC685F1-B36D-4694-8082-FB70A5A67F62@opencsw.org> References: <1315745947-sup-1652@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <2AC685F1-B36D-4694-8082-FB70A5A67F62@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <1315747326-sup-7132@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Dagobert Michelsen's message of Sun Sep 11 09:20:16 -0400 2011: > The issue of Rupert as been fixed a long time ago: > http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/buildfarm/2011-July/002164.html Ok, I didn't go through the history on this thread. Glad he worked around it. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From maciej at opencsw.org Sun Sep 11 22:49:51 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:49:51 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] libppl_dev on the buildfarm Message-ID: Hello, Please install libppl_dev on the buildfarm. It's necessary for the cloog build (a gcc dependency). It will probably also need a functional unstable10x. Maciej From bwalton at opencsw.org Mon Sep 12 02:06:55 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 20:06:55 -0400 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] libppl_dev on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1315785994-sup-4298@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski's message of Sun Sep 11 16:49:51 -0400 2011: > Please install libppl_dev on the buildfarm. It's necessary for the > cloog build (a gcc dependency). It will probably also need a > functional unstable10x. Do you want this tonight then or can it wait until unstable10x is alive again? Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From maciej at opencsw.org Mon Sep 12 09:17:30 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 08:17:30 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] libppl_dev on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: <1315785994-sup-4298@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <1315785994-sup-4298@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: 2011/9/12 Ben Walton : > Do you want this tonight then or can it wait until unstable10x is > alive again? It has to wait for unstable10x. From jh at baltic-online.de Mon Sep 12 12:30:04 2011 From: jh at baltic-online.de (Jan =?utf-8?Q?Holzh=C3=BCter?=) Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:30:04 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] unstable10x is not responding References: Message-ID: Hi, unstable10x should be up and running again. I hope On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 00:22:11 +0100 Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski wrote: unstable10x is not responding. Can you take a look? Maciej From maciej at opencsw.org Mon Sep 12 12:44:36 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:44:36 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] libppl_dev on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: <1315785994-sup-4298@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: unstable10x is back. libppl_dev can be installed now. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From maciej at opencsw.org Mon Sep 12 20:10:16 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (Maciej Blizinski) Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:10:16 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-buildfarm] gcc-4.6.1 on the buildfarm Message-ID: <20110912181016.0D010BC3@mail.opencsw.org> Could you update gcc on the buildfarm? You could also reply to the 'broken gcc' thread on maintainers at . From dam at opencsw.org Mon Sep 12 22:41:58 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:41:58 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] gcc-4.6.1 on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: <20110912181016.0D010BC3@mail.opencsw.org> References: <20110912181016.0D010BC3@mail.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Maciej, Am 12.09.2011 um 20:10 schrieb Maciej Blizinski: > Could you update gcc on the buildfarm? You could also reply to the 'broken gcc' thread on maintainers at . Updating unstable* now. 89 updated packages, 245 MB!! Best regards -- Dago From maciej at opencsw.org Tue Sep 13 11:22:25 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:22:25 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] gcc-4.6.1 on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: <20110912181016.0D010BC3@mail.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Em 12/09/2011 21:42, "Dagobert Michelsen" escreveu: > > Hi Maciej, > > Am 12.09.2011 um 20:10 schrieb Maciej Blizinski: > > Could you update gcc on the buildfarm? You could also reply to the 'broken gcc' thread on maintainers at . > > Updating unstable* now. 89 updated packages, 245 MB!! Nice! With gcc working well, we will do an integration to dublin soon. > > Best regards > > -- Dago > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From csw at apt-get.be Tue Sep 13 18:47:37 2011 From: csw at apt-get.be (Claudio) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:47:37 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] mail to external addresses from zones perl10s and perl9s Message-ID: Hi, I am setting up smoke servers to test Solaris perl releases (thanks to Dagobert). The result is sent upstream to a @perl.org address. I also would like to get a copy of the reports. It seems that the zones only accept mail to @opencsw.org. Would a forward (.forward) of an alias be a solution for this problem? Claudio From sgtmcd at gmail.com Tue Sep 13 20:53:26 2011 From: sgtmcd at gmail.com (Shawn McDermott) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:53:26 -0500 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] maintainer account Message-ID: I am in the process of using opencsw to create and maintain some packages for internal use, however, I have several dependencies that I will be creating packages for as well. It might be cool if I can make those packages available to the world since they are for publicly available projects like tokyocabinet. Regards, Shawn McDermott From bonivart at opencsw.org Tue Sep 13 22:04:29 2011 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:04:29 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] maintainer account In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Shawn McDermott wrote: > I am in the process of using opencsw to create and maintain some > packages for internal use, however, I have several dependencies that I > will be creating packages for as well. ?It might be cool if I can make > those packages available to the world since they are for publicly > available projects like tokyocabinet. That would be great! Please take a look at http://www.opencsw.org/extend-it/signup/ on how to become a maintainer, then you will have access to our build farm to simplify building packages. /peter From bwalton at opencsw.org Tue Sep 13 22:12:13 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:12:13 -0400 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] maintainer account In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1315944577-sup-1822@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Shawn McDermott's message of Tue Sep 13 14:53:26 -0400 2011: Hi Shawn, > I am in the process of using opencsw to create and maintain some > packages for internal use, however, I have several dependencies that > I will be creating packages for as well. It might be cool if I can > make those packages available to the world since they are for > publicly available projects like tokyocabinet. We'll get you going asap. We need the following from you: 1. Mantis username from (http://www.opencsw.org/mantis). This will become your buildfarm login and your @opencsw.org address. 2. Sourceforge username for commit rights. 3. External email (we'll use this one most likely unless you'd prefer another one? 4. SSH public key. 5. An initial package that you'll be working on. I'll try to create this tonight if you get me all the required details. Feel free to say hi in #opencsw on freenode's IRC too. It's a friendly bunch in there. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From dam at opencsw.org Tue Sep 13 22:46:39 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:46:39 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] mail to external addresses from zones perl10s and perl9s In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9658908F-2C24-41C6-89F2-179F6E148DB4@opencsw.org> Hi Claudio, Am 13.09.2011 um 18:47 schrieb Claudio: > I am setting up smoke servers to test Solaris perl releases (thanks to > Dagobert). The result is sent upstream to a @perl.org address. I also > would like to get a copy of the reports. > > It seems that the zones only accept mail to @opencsw.org. Would a > forward (.forward) of an alias be a solution for this problem? I guess this is due to the exim configuration on the mailproxy "web". Ben, would you mind adding arbitrary relaying from the inside? (192.168.*.*) I am not really into exim... Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From bwalton at opencsw.org Wed Sep 14 01:58:19 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:58:19 -0400 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Fwd: Re: mail to external addresses from zones perl10s and perl9s Message-ID: <1315958290-sup-3872@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Missed a comma in there... --- Begin forwarded message from Ben Walton --- From: Ben Walton To: Claudio Cc: "Dagobert Michelsen BuildFarm List" Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:55:47 -0400 Subject: Re: [csw-buildfarm] mail to external addresses from zones perl10s and perl9s Excerpts from Dagobert Michelsen's message of Tue Sep 13 16:46:39 -0400 2011: Hi Claudio, > Am 13.09.2011 um 18:47 schrieb Claudio: > I am setting up smoke > servers to test Solaris perl releases (thanks to > Dagobert). The > result is sent upstream to a @perl.org address. I also > would like > to get a copy of the reports. > > > > It seems that the zones only accept mail to @opencsw.org. Would a > > forward (.forward) of an alias be a solution for this problem? > > I guess this is due to the exim configuration on the mailproxy "web". > Ben, would you mind adding arbitrary relaying from the inside? (192.168.*.*) > I am not really into exim... Done. I thought aliases a good choice as I didn't know that relaying would be an acceptable alternate. This is a nicer overall though. Let me know if it doesn't work. Thanks -Ben --- End forwarded message --- -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From csw at apt-get.be Thu Sep 15 16:17:40 2011 From: csw at apt-get.be (Claudio) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:17:40 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] mail to external addresses from zones perl10s and perl9s In-Reply-To: <1315958063-sup-9579@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <9658908F-2C24-41C6-89F2-179F6E148DB4@opencsw.org> <1315958063-sup-9579@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: Hi Ben, Thank you... but it does not work: perl10s# mailx -s test csw at apt-get.be < /etc/motd perl10s# grep ^DS /etc/mail/*.cf /etc/mail/local.cf:DS /etc/mail/main.cf:DSmailhost /etc/mail/sendmail.cf:DSmailhost /etc/mail/submit.cf:DS /etc/mail/subsidiary.cf:DSmailhost perl10s# grep mailhost /etc/hosts 192.168.1.6 mirror proxy mailhost No mail. Can you have a look? Thanks, Claudio On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:55 AM, Ben Walton wrote: > Excerpts from Dagobert Michelsen's message of Tue Sep 13 16:46:39 -0400 2011: > > Hi Claudio, > >> Am 13.09.2011 um 18:47 schrieb Claudio: > I am setting up smoke >> servers to test Solaris perl releases (thanks to > Dagobert). The >> result is sent upstream to a @perl.org address. I also > would like >> to get a copy of the reports. >> > >> > It seems that the zones only accept mail to @opencsw.org. Would a >> > forward (.forward) of an alias be a solution for this problem? >> >> I guess this is due to the exim configuration on the mailproxy "web". >> Ben, would you mind adding arbitrary relaying from the inside? (192.168.*.*) >> I am not really into exim... > > Done. ?I thought aliases a good choice as I didn't know that relaying > would be an acceptable alternate. ?This is a nicer overall though. > > Let me know if it doesn't work. > > Thanks > -Ben > -- > Ben Walton > Systems Programmer - CHASS > University of Toronto > C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 > > From bwalton at opencsw.org Fri Sep 16 01:30:04 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:30:04 -0400 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] mail to external addresses from zones perl10s and perl9s In-Reply-To: References: <9658908F-2C24-41C6-89F2-179F6E148DB4@opencsw.org> <1315958063-sup-9579@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: <1316129169-sup-8248@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Claudio's message of Thu Sep 15 10:17:40 -0400 2011: > perl10s# mailx -s test csw at apt-get.be < /etc/motd > > perl10s# grep ^DS /etc/mail/*.cf > /etc/mail/local.cf:DS > /etc/mail/main.cf:DSmailhost > /etc/mail/sendmail.cf:DSmailhost > /etc/mail/submit.cf:DS > /etc/mail/subsidiary.cf:DSmailhost I see the following in the reject logs on web(mirror): 2011-09-13 18:03:31 SMTP call from perl10s.bo.opencsw.org [192.168.1.62] dropped: too many unrecognized commands (last was "") Does a manual connection from the box to web:25 allow you to send a simple mail? I can get you the exim config from cswsign to transplant on that box. I then use the sendmail relay so that /usr/lib/sendmail sees mail pushed into localhost:25 via smtp... Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From csw at apt-get.be Fri Sep 16 09:18:44 2011 From: csw at apt-get.be (Claudio) Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:18:44 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] mail to external addresses from zones perl10s and perl9s In-Reply-To: <1316129169-sup-8248@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> References: <9658908F-2C24-41C6-89F2-179F6E148DB4@opencsw.org> <1315958063-sup-9579@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1316129169-sup-8248@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Ben Walton wrote: > > Does a manual connection from the box to web:25 allow you to send a > simple mail? ?I can get you the exim config from cswsign to transplant > on that box. ?I then use the sendmail relay so that /usr/lib/sendmail > sees mail pushed into localhost:25 via smtp... > perl10s# telnet mailhost 25 Trying 192.168.1.6... telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused perl10s# telnet web 25 Trying 192.168.1.6... telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused Claudio From dam at opencsw.org Fri Sep 16 09:51:19 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:51:19 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] mail to external addresses from zones perl10s and perl9s In-Reply-To: References: <9658908F-2C24-41C6-89F2-179F6E148DB4@opencsw.org> <1315958063-sup-9579@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1316129169-sup-8248@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: Hi Claudio, Am 16.09.2011 um 09:18 schrieb Claudio: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Ben Walton wrote: >> >> Does a manual connection from the box to web:25 allow you to send a >> simple mail? I can get you the exim config from cswsign to transplant >> on that box. I then use the sendmail relay so that /usr/lib/sendmail >> sees mail pushed into localhost:25 via smtp... > > perl10s# telnet mailhost 25 > Trying 192.168.1.6... > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused > perl10s# telnet web 25 > Trying 192.168.1.6... > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused cswexim was in maintenance state. I restarted it and now sending mail works as expected from perl9s and perl10s (yes, I have verified that :-) Sorry for the inconvenience -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From csw at apt-get.be Fri Sep 16 09:53:53 2011 From: csw at apt-get.be (Claudio) Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:53:53 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] mail to external addresses from zones perl10s and perl9s In-Reply-To: References: <9658908F-2C24-41C6-89F2-179F6E148DB4@opencsw.org> <1315958063-sup-9579@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> <1316129169-sup-8248@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > cswexim was in maintenance state. I restarted it and now sending > mail works as expected from perl9s and perl10s (yes, I have > verified that :-) > Perfect (I received all the test mails in a batch :) ). Thx, Claudio From maciej at opencsw.org Sun Sep 18 11:15:18 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 10:15:18 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] CSWlibmpfr-dev installation broken Message-ID: The CSWlibmpfr-dev installation is broken on the buildfarm the libmpfr.so symlink is missing in /opt/csw/lib. Please reinstall on all hosts. From dam at opencsw.org Sun Sep 18 12:22:33 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 12:22:33 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] CSWlibmpfr-dev installation broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <47963416-FF00-4F8C-87EA-9C8FE6B520AD@opencsw.org> Hi Maciej, Am 18.09.2011 um 11:15 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski: > The CSWlibmpfr-dev installation is broken on the buildfarm the > libmpfr.so symlink is missing in /opt/csw/lib. Please reinstall on > all hosts. Reinstalled CSWlibmpfr-dev on unstable* Best regards -- Dago From maciej at opencsw.org Tue Sep 20 15:30:24 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:30:24 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] gcc on the buildfarm Message-ID: I've updated the gcc4 packages, please upgrade them on the buildfarm too. There are no big changes, only changed dependencies, so no big deal. Just to be sure that we use on the buildfarm the same thing we ship to users. Maciej From reservas at viladobosque.com.br Thu Sep 22 19:14:37 2011 From: reservas at viladobosque.com.br (Pousada Vila do Bosque) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 21:14:37 +0400 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Outubro de sol em Bombinhas! Message-ID: <8579e953daf5315dc071bee8c87ff750@mkt.bombinhasmarketing.com.br> Seu cliente de e-mail n?o pode ler este e-mail. Para visualiz?-lo on-line, por favor, clique aqui: http://mkt.bombinhasmarketing.com.br/display.php?M=29897&C=ea8c9076e39498db11c62f65d685db1e&S=36&L=1&N=13 Para parar de receber nossos Emails:http://mkt.bombinhasmarketing.com.br/unsubscribe.php?M=29897&C=ea8c9076e39498db11c62f65d685db1e&L=1&N=36 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From skayser at opencsw.org Sun Sep 25 10:17:33 2011 From: skayser at opencsw.org (Sebastian Kayser) Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 10:17:33 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install/update: mgar. TIA! (eom) Message-ID: <201109250817.p8P8HXtc014153@login.bo.opencsw.org> Sebastian From bwalton at opencsw.org Sun Sep 25 15:36:09 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 09:36:09 -0400 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please install/update: mgar. TIA! (eom) In-Reply-To: <201109250817.p8P8HXtc014153@login.bo.opencsw.org> References: <201109250817.p8P8HXtc014153@login.bo.opencsw.org> Message-ID: <1316957729-sup-5497@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Sebastian Kayser's message of Sun Sep 25 04:17:33 -0400 2011: Hi Sebastian, It looks like this was already done. The unstable* boxes are currently getting an updated libgmp10 but all other deps (direct or indirect) are up to date. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From maciej at opencsw.org Mon Sep 26 00:53:18 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 23:53:18 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Ada related packages Message-ID: Please install following packages on the buildfarm: gcc3ada cloog_dev From bwalton at opencsw.org Mon Sep 26 02:38:17 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 20:38:17 -0400 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Ada related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1316997487-sup-1170@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski's message of Sun Sep 25 18:53:18 -0400 2011: > Please install following packages on the buildfarm: > > gcc3ada > cloog_dev Installing these now. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From maciej at opencsw.org Mon Sep 26 22:13:08 2011 From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=) Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:13:08 +0100 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] CSWsmake on the buildfarm Message-ID: Joerg recommends it, I don't mind. Can you install it? From bwalton at opencsw.org Mon Sep 26 22:20:07 2011 From: bwalton at opencsw.org (Ben Walton) Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:20:07 -0400 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] CSWsmake on the buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1317068396-sup-3792@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski's message of Mon Sep 26 16:13:08 -0400 2011: > Joerg recommends it, I don't mind. Can you install it? Running now. -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 From edwin at clamav.net Wed Sep 28 11:40:46 2011 From: edwin at clamav.net (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=F6r=F6k_Edwin?=) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:40:46 +0300 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] SSH key rotation time Message-ID: <4E82EB9E.3000600@clamav.net> Hi, I generated new SSH keys (old ones are from 2006). Should I go ahead and update my authorized_keys file, or is that something you'd like to do? Best regards, --Edwin -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: id_rsa_oc.pub URL: From dam at opencsw.org Wed Sep 28 11:44:18 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:44:18 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] SSH key rotation time In-Reply-To: <4E82EB9E.3000600@clamav.net> References: <4E82EB9E.3000600@clamav.net> Message-ID: <962740AA-5242-4E66-84B1-6FDF0798CB87@opencsw.org> Hi T?r?k, Am 28.09.2011 um 11:40 schrieb T?r?k Edwin: > I generated new SSH keys (old ones are from 2006). > Should I go ahead and update my authorized_keys file, or is that something > you'd like to do? Please go ahead, you can edit it yourself :-) Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From david at bamsoftware.com Wed Sep 28 23:57:06 2011 From: david at bamsoftware.com (David Fifield) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:57:06 -0700 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Nmap access to Solaris build farm Message-ID: <20110928215705.GA21307@debian.bamsoftware.com> Dagobert, In http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2011/q3/646, you offered to let us have access to the Solaris build farm for the purpose of testing Nmap. We'd like to accept the offer. I've seen the page at http://www.opencsw.org/extend-it/contribute-packages/build-standards/build-machines/. Here is an SSH public key. If you need a user name, "nmap" will do. Do you need anything else? David Fifield -------------- next part -------------- ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAABIwAAAQEAyHN7TvqXi9ugnSxqc82zCVSGOEvPNXrN6m/otLOIidRvZ+MTrU7ImLMW00DdO8U+YbaqbzoXNPXcuYrXlpOuuegbu07/mv/PuMExD7Pm7AF/qULl6H2bzK8Jev6ugP/R7XwtjMYMh5u9VpnZt8KS43p6shbwCJWsF/P66s086U+y+6Vb4ImZfNr1SlnNkhFBBlvNChqiQJ9Mb+wydsxYxXJmOcjp8bJWSLqSTdKqdmFWrJa6x7NO9ykMrN3P47F0AX+3V2Bj13lp1kCk96DHq3rLQxidxsbbmpUxDLTabIbjjO1I6Z+Mxwv2GDMpDDuIsZ1TMVNVU2b1hsD51q8JTQ== david at debian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From david at bamsoftware.com Thu Sep 29 00:05:02 2011 From: david at bamsoftware.com (David Fifield) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:05:02 -0700 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Nmap access to Solaris build farm In-Reply-To: <20110928215705.GA21307@debian.bamsoftware.com> References: <20110928215705.GA21307@debian.bamsoftware.com> Message-ID: <20110928220502.GB21307@debian.bamsoftware.com> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:57:05PM -0700, David Fifield wrote: > Dagobert, > > In http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2011/q3/646, you offered to let us have > access to the Solaris build farm for the purpose of testing Nmap. We'd > like to accept the offer. > > I've seen the page at > http://www.opencsw.org/extend-it/contribute-packages/build-standards/build-machines/. > Here is an SSH public key. If you need a user name, "nmap" will do. Do > you need anything else? I forgot to add: does build farm access include root access? Most non-trivial testing of Nmap requires access to raw sockets. David Fifield From dam at opencsw.org Thu Sep 29 11:40:18 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:40:18 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Nmap access to Solaris build farm In-Reply-To: <20110928215705.GA21307@debian.bamsoftware.com> References: <20110928215705.GA21307@debian.bamsoftware.com> Message-ID: <85141536-7EA4-4F25-BF69-A01D7EF762DC@opencsw.org> Hi David, Am 28.09.2011 um 23:57 schrieb David Fifield: > In http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2011/q3/646, you offered to let us have > access to the Solaris build farm for the purpose of testing Nmap. We'd > like to accept the offer. Cool. > I've seen the page at > http://www.opencsw.org/extend-it/contribute-packages/build-standards/build-machines/. > Here is an SSH public key. If you need a user name, "nmap" will do. I would prefer a personal account name. Would "david" be ok? > Do you need anything else? Can I list you with NMAP on the upstream page? http://www.opencsw.org/extend-it/signup/to-upstream-maintainers/ Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From dam at opencsw.org Thu Sep 29 11:42:36 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:42:36 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Nmap access to Solaris build farm In-Reply-To: <20110928220502.GB21307@debian.bamsoftware.com> References: <20110928215705.GA21307@debian.bamsoftware.com> <20110928220502.GB21307@debian.bamsoftware.com> Message-ID: <13DFA436-B696-42F9-9A52-F79BB09D389D@opencsw.org> Hi David, Am 29.09.2011 um 00:05 schrieb David Fifield: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:57:05PM -0700, David Fifield wrote: >> In http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2011/q3/646, you offered to let us have >> access to the Solaris build farm for the purpose of testing Nmap. We'd >> like to accept the offer. >> >> I've seen the page at >> http://www.opencsw.org/extend-it/contribute-packages/build-standards/build-machines/. >> Here is an SSH public key. If you need a user name, "nmap" will do. Do >> you need anything else? > > I forgot to add: does build farm access include root access? Most > non-trivial testing of Nmap requires access to raw sockets. Not by default. What do you need? Will an internal zone without connection to the internet (only via the login server) suffice? We are a bit short on official IP adresses, but if you need one I can set up a special zone with root access just for nmap and a dedicated network interface. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From david at bamsoftware.com Thu Sep 29 16:24:55 2011 From: david at bamsoftware.com (David Fifield) Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:24:55 -0700 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Nmap access to Solaris build farm In-Reply-To: <13DFA436-B696-42F9-9A52-F79BB09D389D@opencsw.org> References: <20110928215705.GA21307@debian.bamsoftware.com> <20110928220502.GB21307@debian.bamsoftware.com> <13DFA436-B696-42F9-9A52-F79BB09D389D@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <20110929142455.GA32530@debian.bamsoftware.com> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:42:36AM +0200, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi David, > > Am 29.09.2011 um 00:05 schrieb David Fifield: > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:57:05PM -0700, David Fifield wrote: > >> In http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2011/q3/646, you offered to let us have > >> access to the Solaris build farm for the purpose of testing Nmap. We'd > >> like to accept the offer. > >> > >> I've seen the page at > >> http://www.opencsw.org/extend-it/contribute-packages/build-standards/build-machines/. > >> Here is an SSH public key. If you need a user name, "nmap" will do. Do > >> you need anything else? > > > > I forgot to add: does build farm access include root access? Most > > non-trivial testing of Nmap requires access to raw sockets. > > Not by default. What do you need? Will an internal zone without > connection to the internet (only via the login server) suffice? We are > a bit short on official IP adresses, but if you need one I can set up > a special zone with root access just for nmap and a dedicated network > interface. It doesn't necessarily have to have raw sockets to the Internet; just being able to scan internal IPs would be okay. We had trouble with another Solaris zone because it didn't have the /dev/ip device. I found this documentation: http://docs.huihoo.com/opensolaris/solaris-containers-resource-management-and-solaris-zones/html/p87.html In general, all applications can run in a non-global zone. However, the following types of applications might not be suitable for this environment: * The few applications dependent upon certain devices that do not exist in a non-global zone, such as /dev/kmem or /dev/ip. I think, in short, that we need the DLPI interface; i.e., the "snoop" command would have to work. From what I read, that would expose even traffic destined to other zones, so a dedicated network interface is a good idea if that's easy to do. David Fifield From david at bamsoftware.com Thu Sep 29 16:31:49 2011 From: david at bamsoftware.com (David Fifield) Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:31:49 -0700 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Nmap access to Solaris build farm In-Reply-To: <85141536-7EA4-4F25-BF69-A01D7EF762DC@opencsw.org> References: <20110928215705.GA21307@debian.bamsoftware.com> <85141536-7EA4-4F25-BF69-A01D7EF762DC@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <20110929143148.GB32530@debian.bamsoftware.com> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:40:18AM +0200, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi David, > > Am 28.09.2011 um 23:57 schrieb David Fifield: > > In http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2011/q3/646, you offered to let us have > > access to the Solaris build farm for the purpose of testing Nmap. We'd > > like to accept the offer. > > Cool. > > > I've seen the page at > > http://www.opencsw.org/extend-it/contribute-packages/build-standards/build-machines/. > > Here is an SSH public key. If you need a user name, "nmap" will do. > > I would prefer a personal account name. Would "david" be ok? Sure. > > Do you need anything else? > > Can I list you with NMAP on the upstream page? > http://www.opencsw.org/extend-it/signup/to-upstream-maintainers/ Sure, I hope to make sure it works for us first though. David Fifield From dam at opencsw.org Thu Sep 29 17:44:12 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:44:12 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Nmap access to Solaris build farm In-Reply-To: <20110929143148.GB32530@debian.bamsoftware.com> References: <20110928215705.GA21307@debian.bamsoftware.com> <85141536-7EA4-4F25-BF69-A01D7EF762DC@opencsw.org> <20110929143148.GB32530@debian.bamsoftware.com> Message-ID: <8A181B3B-0B64-4704-A425-E2B405CAA5AB@opencsw.org> Hi David, Am 29.09.2011 um 16:31 schrieb David Fifield: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:40:18AM +0200, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Am 28.09.2011 um 23:57 schrieb David Fifield: >>> In http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2011/q3/646, you offered to let us have >>> access to the Solaris build farm for the purpose of testing Nmap. We'd >>> like to accept the offer. >> >> Cool. >> >>> I've seen the page at >>> http://www.opencsw.org/extend-it/contribute-packages/build-standards/build-machines/. >>> Here is an SSH public key. If you need a user name, "nmap" will do. >> >> I would prefer a personal account name. Would "david" be ok? > > Sure. You should now have access with ssh david at login.opencsw.org Make sure to read /etc/SETUP. Just let me know if you need anything. >>> Do you need anything else? >> >> Can I list you with NMAP on the upstream page? >> http://www.opencsw.org/extend-it/signup/to-upstream-maintainers/ > > Sure, I hope to make sure it works for us first though. Ok. Best regards -- Dao From dam at opencsw.org Thu Sep 29 17:46:28 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:46:28 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Nmap access to Solaris build farm In-Reply-To: <20110929142455.GA32530@debian.bamsoftware.com> References: <20110928215705.GA21307@debian.bamsoftware.com> <20110928220502.GB21307@debian.bamsoftware.com> <13DFA436-B696-42F9-9A52-F79BB09D389D@opencsw.org> <20110929142455.GA32530@debian.bamsoftware.com> Message-ID: <5C91E747-D63B-4A56-BEF5-EBEB63468348@opencsw.org> Hi David, Am 29.09.2011 um 16:24 schrieb David Fifield: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:42:36AM +0200, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> Am 29.09.2011 um 00:05 schrieb David Fifield: >>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:57:05PM -0700, David Fifield wrote: >>>> In http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2011/q3/646, you offered to let us have >>>> access to the Solaris build farm for the purpose of testing Nmap. We'd >>>> like to accept the offer. >>>> >>>> I've seen the page at >>>> http://www.opencsw.org/extend-it/contribute-packages/build-standards/build-machines/. >>>> Here is an SSH public key. If you need a user name, "nmap" will do. Do >>>> you need anything else? >>> >>> I forgot to add: does build farm access include root access? Most >>> non-trivial testing of Nmap requires access to raw sockets. >> >> Not by default. What do you need? Will an internal zone without >> connection to the internet (only via the login server) suffice? We are >> a bit short on official IP adresses, but if you need one I can set up >> a special zone with root access just for nmap and a dedicated network >> interface. > > It doesn't necessarily have to have raw sockets to the Internet; just > being able to scan internal IPs would be okay. > > We had trouble with another Solaris zone because it didn't have the > /dev/ip device. I found this documentation: > > http://docs.huihoo.com/opensolaris/solaris-containers-resource-management-and-solaris-zones/html/p87.html > In general, all applications can run in a non-global zone. > However, the following types of applications might not be > suitable for this environment: > * The few applications dependent upon certain devices that do > not exist in a non-global zone, such as /dev/kmem or /dev/ip. > > I think, in short, that we need the DLPI interface; i.e., the "snoop" > command would have to work. From what I read, that would expose even > traffic destined to other zones, so a dedicated network interface is a > good idea if that's easy to do. A zone with exclusive interface may suffice, I'll set this up tomorrow. If that is not enough I can generate a vSphere VM which definitely fits your requirements, but has also a larger footprint in terms of patching etc. so I would go with a zone first. I'll keep you informed. Best regards -- Dago From bonivart at opencsw.org Fri Sep 30 11:40:58 2011 From: bonivart at opencsw.org (Peter Bonivart) Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:40:58 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please update CSWsendmail/CSWlibmilter on unstable hosts Message-ID: Thanks. /peter From dam at opencsw.org Fri Sep 30 14:07:41 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:07:41 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Please update CSWsendmail/CSWlibmilter on unstable hosts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4840C208-B29A-4C1E-8011-803BF7C37931@opencsw.org> Hi Peter, Am 30.09.2011 um 11:40 schrieb Peter Bonivart: > Please update CSWsendmail/CSWlibmilter on unstable hosts Doing this now. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From dam at opencsw.org Fri Sep 30 17:39:59 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:39:59 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Nmap access to Solaris build farm In-Reply-To: <5C91E747-D63B-4A56-BEF5-EBEB63468348@opencsw.org> References: <20110928215705.GA21307@debian.bamsoftware.com> <20110928220502.GB21307@debian.bamsoftware.com> <13DFA436-B696-42F9-9A52-F79BB09D389D@opencsw.org> <20110929142455.GA32530@debian.bamsoftware.com> <5C91E747-D63B-4A56-BEF5-EBEB63468348@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi David, Am 29.09.2011 um 17:46 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen: > Am 29.09.2011 um 16:24 schrieb David Fifield: >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:42:36AM +0200, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >>> Am 29.09.2011 um 00:05 schrieb David Fifield: >>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:57:05PM -0700, David Fifield wrote: >>>>> In http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2011/q3/646, you offered to let us have >>>>> access to the Solaris build farm for the purpose of testing Nmap. We'd >>>>> like to accept the offer. >>>>> >>>>> I've seen the page at >>>>> http://www.opencsw.org/extend-it/contribute-packages/build-standards/build-machines/. >>>>> Here is an SSH public key. If you need a user name, "nmap" will do. Do >>>>> you need anything else? >>>> >>>> I forgot to add: does build farm access include root access? Most >>>> non-trivial testing of Nmap requires access to raw sockets. >>> >>> Not by default. What do you need? Will an internal zone without >>> connection to the internet (only via the login server) suffice? We are >>> a bit short on official IP adresses, but if you need one I can set up >>> a special zone with root access just for nmap and a dedicated network >>> interface. >> >> It doesn't necessarily have to have raw sockets to the Internet; just >> being able to scan internal IPs would be okay. >> >> We had trouble with another Solaris zone because it didn't have the >> /dev/ip device. I found this documentation: >> >> http://docs.huihoo.com/opensolaris/solaris-containers-resource-management-and-solaris-zones/html/p87.html >> In general, all applications can run in a non-global zone. >> However, the following types of applications might not be >> suitable for this environment: >> * The few applications dependent upon certain devices that do >> not exist in a non-global zone, such as /dev/kmem or /dev/ip. >> >> I think, in short, that we need the DLPI interface; i.e., the "snoop" >> command would have to work. From what I read, that would expose even >> traffic destined to other zones, so a dedicated network interface is a >> good idea if that's easy to do. > > A zone with exclusive interface may suffice, I'll set this up tomorrow. > If that is not enough I can generate a vSphere VM which definitely > fits your requirements, but has also a larger footprint in terms of > patching etc. so I would go with a zone first. > > I'll keep you informed. I made a new zone Solaris 10 Sparc with exclusive interface vnet2: david at login [login]:~ > ssh root at nmap10s It is not really separated from the other buildfarm traffic, so please do not fubar the installation. The zone still has some minor issues which however should not disturb initial testing. Please let me know if you see anything strange. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From raos at opencsw.org Fri Sep 30 21:37:55 2011 From: raos at opencsw.org (Rafael Ostertag) Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 21:37:55 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Dbus on unstable10s Message-ID: <20110930193755.GA16730@bender.opencsw.org> Hi guys Would it be much of a bother to start dbus on unstable10s? It is disabled since September, 12. Thanks a lot in advance. Have a nice weekend. rafi From dam at opencsw.org Fri Sep 30 21:41:06 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 21:41:06 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Dbus on unstable10s In-Reply-To: <20110930193755.GA16730@bender.opencsw.org> References: <20110930193755.GA16730@bender.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Rafael, Am 30.09.2011 um 21:37 schrieb Rafael Ostertag: > Would it be much of a bother to start dbus on unstable10s? It is disabled since September, 12. Done. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From dam at opencsw.org Fri Sep 30 21:45:11 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 21:45:11 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] Dbus on unstable10s In-Reply-To: References: <20110930193755.GA16730@bender.opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Rafi, Am 30.09.2011 um 21:41 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen: > Am 30.09.2011 um 21:37 schrieb Rafael Ostertag: >> Would it be much of a bother to start dbus on unstable10s? It is disabled since September, 12. > > Done. I commented out the respective section. Do you know why dbus shouldn't run in a local zone? https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=3961 Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From dam at opencsw.org Fri Sep 30 21:56:38 2011 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 21:56:38 +0200 Subject: [csw-buildfarm] [csw-maintainers] Fwd: proftpd build problem In-Reply-To: References: <201109301937.27994.ai@vsu.ru> <6147D366-32DB-4386-BEF5-2300864D239B@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <990CF0B0-0562-41F7-AE65-2E3D68D4ED8F@opencsw.org> Hi Maciej, Am 30.09.2011 um 18:24 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski: > 2011/9/30 Dagobert Michelsen : >>> one more thing. does anyone maintain mysql5 now? >>> >>> the directory structure of /opt/csw/mysql5/lib is changed. >>> is it final change or it will be changed from time to time? >> >> Yes, Maciej maintains it. >> >> Maciej: I think it is final, is it? > > /opt/csw/mysql5/lib is going away. Libraries will be now in > /opt/csw/lib, the same goes for include files (now in > /opt/csw/include). > > I've just built a new set of packages and pushed them to unstable. > Dago, if you refresh buildfarm with these packages, Andy will have the > current CSWmysql-dev to work with. Updating unstable* now. Best regards -- Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896