From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org Tue Oct 7 13:18:09 2014 From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen via buildfarm) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 13:18:09 +0200 Subject: guillomovitch account on buildfarm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4D7A861A-1258-405E-AE91-7D8E9F2407FD@opencsw.org> Hi, Am 30.09.2014 um 01:54 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski via buildfarm : > 19:34 < guillomovitch> hello > 21:11 < guillomovitch> I'm affected by my username change... > 21:12 < guillomovitch> ginstall -d /home/guillomovitch/pkgs > 21:12 < guillomovitch> ginstall: cannot create directory '/home/guillomovitch': > Operation not applicable > 21:12 < guillomovitch> /home/grousse/opencsw/.buildsys/v2/gar//gar.pkg.mk:937: > recipe for target '/home/guillomovitch/pkgs' failed > 21:12 < guillomovitch> when running 'mgar repackage' > Day changed to 30 Sep 2014 > 01:18 < automaciej> guillomovitch: can you write to buildfarm@ about this? > > The user name has to be shortened to 8 chars. Who can handle this? This is a thing you can handle yourself, just edit your .garrc: > root at login [login]:/home/grousse > more .garrc > SPKG_PACKAGER = Guillaume Rousse > SPKG_EMAIL = guillomovitch at opencsw.org > > # Where to store generated packages > SPKG_EXPORT = /home/guillomovitch/pkgs > > # Where to store downloaded sources > GARCHIVEDIR = /home/guillomovitch/src > > # Disable package sanity checks by checkpkg if you are building on your > # own host (checkpkg depends on OpenCSW buildfarm infrastructure) > #ENABLE_CHECK = 0 > > BUILDTREE=/home/guillomovitch/opencsw > > BUILDTREE=/home/guillomovitch/opencsw > > BUILDTREE=/home/grousse/opencsw Best regards ? Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2418 bytes Desc: not available URL: From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org Thu Oct 23 21:53:21 2014 From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Jake Goerzen via buildfarm) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:53:21 -0700 Subject: update openssl Message-ID: <54495CB1.6020300@opencsw.org> Hi, Could we update OpenSSL on the buildfarm? Verison 1.0.1j has been in unstable catalog since 10/15. Thanks, -Jake $ pkgutil -U -C | grep ssl | grep 1.0.1 You're not root and didn't set -W, using home dir. CSWlibssl-dev 1.0.1i,REV=2014.08.08 1.0.1j,REV=2014.10.15 CSWlibssl1-0-0 1.0.1i,REV=2014.08.08 1.0.1j,REV=2014.10.15 CSWopenssl-utils 1.0.1i,REV=2014.08.08 1.0.1j,REV=2014.10.15 From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org Fri Oct 24 10:15:02 2014 From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen via buildfarm) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:15:02 +0200 Subject: update openssl In-Reply-To: <54495CB1.6020300@opencsw.org> References: <54495CB1.6020300@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <49692DE5-6589-4FA7-BBC6-B195D0BBC90E@opencsw.org> Hi Jake, > Am 23.10.2014 um 21:53 schrieb Jake Goerzen via buildfarm : > > Hi, > > Could we update OpenSSL on the buildfarm? Verison 1.0.1j has been in unstable catalog since 10/15. > > Thanks, > -Jake > > $ pkgutil -U -C | grep ssl | grep 1.0.1 > You're not root and didn't set -W, using home dir. > CSWlibssl-dev 1.0.1i,REV=2014.08.08 1.0.1j,REV=2014.10.15 > CSWlibssl1-0-0 1.0.1i,REV=2014.08.08 1.0.1j,REV=2014.10.15 > CSWopenssl-utils 1.0.1i,REV=2014.08.08 1.0.1j,REV=2014.10.15 Sure. Which machine are you referring to? Best regards ? Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2418 bytes Desc: not available URL: From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org Fri Oct 24 17:24:23 2014 From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Jake Goerzen via buildfarm) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:24:23 -0700 Subject: update openssl In-Reply-To: <49692DE5-6589-4FA7-BBC6-B195D0BBC90E@opencsw.org> References: <54495CB1.6020300@opencsw.org> <49692DE5-6589-4FA7-BBC6-B195D0BBC90E@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <79A526FC-1AEE-4FFB-BBDD-1419602151CB@opencsw.org> On Oct 24, 2014, at 1:15 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Jake, > >> Am 23.10.2014 um 21:53 schrieb Jake Goerzen via buildfarm : >> >> Hi, >> >> Could we update OpenSSL on the buildfarm? Verison 1.0.1j has been in unstable catalog since 10/15. >> >> Thanks, >> -Jake >> >> $ pkgutil -U -C | grep ssl | grep 1.0.1 >> You're not root and didn't set -W, using home dir. >> CSWlibssl-dev 1.0.1i,REV=2014.08.08 1.0.1j,REV=2014.10.15 >> CSWlibssl1-0-0 1.0.1i,REV=2014.08.08 1.0.1j,REV=2014.10.15 >> CSWopenssl-utils 1.0.1i,REV=2014.08.08 1.0.1j,REV=2014.10.15 > > Sure. Which machine are you referring to? > > Hi Dago, Unstable10x and unstable10s This is so I can rebuild the tor packages other wise tor logs a warning telling the user that tor was built with 1.0.1i but running with 1.0.1j. Thanks, -Jake From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org Sat Oct 25 14:06:02 2014 From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen via buildfarm) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 14:06:02 +0200 Subject: update openssl In-Reply-To: <79A526FC-1AEE-4FFB-BBDD-1419602151CB@opencsw.org> References: <54495CB1.6020300@opencsw.org> <49692DE5-6589-4FA7-BBC6-B195D0BBC90E@opencsw.org> <79A526FC-1AEE-4FFB-BBDD-1419602151CB@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Jake, > Am 24.10.2014 um 17:24 schrieb Jake Goerzen : > On Oct 24, 2014, at 1:15 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >>> Am 23.10.2014 um 21:53 schrieb Jake Goerzen via buildfarm : >>> Could we update OpenSSL on the buildfarm? Verison 1.0.1j has been in unstable catalog since 10/15. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -Jake >>> >>> $ pkgutil -U -C | grep ssl | grep 1.0.1 >>> You're not root and didn't set -W, using home dir. >>> CSWlibssl-dev 1.0.1i,REV=2014.08.08 1.0.1j,REV=2014.10.15 >>> CSWlibssl1-0-0 1.0.1i,REV=2014.08.08 1.0.1j,REV=2014.10.15 >>> CSWopenssl-utils 1.0.1i,REV=2014.08.08 1.0.1j,REV=2014.10.15 >> >> Sure. Which machine are you referring to? > > Unstable10x and unstable10s > > This is so I can rebuild the tor packages other wise tor logs a warning telling the user that tor was built with 1.0.1i but running with 1.0.1j. Done. But you could have built it anyway as the check is runtime, but the linkage would be dynamically to the right library. Best regards ? Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2418 bytes Desc: not available URL: From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org Tue Oct 28 12:10:53 2014 From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?= via buildfarm) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 11:10:53 +0000 Subject: List of maintainer accounts with activity, over JSON Message-ID: Hi buildfarm admins, Is it possible/easy to export, over http in JSON, the list of all active maintainer accounts? We could use it to cross-match the buildfarm account statuses with the CSW database, which is used by the website. This would help us maintain a consistent maintainer status. Something like: [ { "name": "maciej", "type": "maintainer", "active": true }, { "name": "somebody", "type": "maintainer", "active": false }, { "name": "somebodyelse", "type": "upstream", "active": true } ] Maciej -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org Thu Oct 30 21:56:19 2014 From: buildfarm at lists.opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen via buildfarm) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 21:56:19 +0100 Subject: List of maintainer accounts with activity, over JSON In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9BD0F5E2-EB79-4C33-B724-B2599AFCE2B2@opencsw.org> Hi Maciej, > Am 28.10.2014 um 12:10 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski via buildfarm : > > Hi buildfarm admins, > > Is it possible/easy to export, over http in JSON, the list of all active maintainer accounts? We could use it to cross-match the buildfarm account statuses with the CSW database, which is used by the website. This would help us maintain a consistent maintainer status. > > Something like: > > [ > { > "name": "maciej", > "type": "maintainer", > "active": true > }, > { > "name": "somebody", > "type": "maintainer", > "active": false > }, > { > "name": "somebodyelse", > "type": "upstream", > "active": true > } > ] > > Maciej Sure this is possible. I?ll see that I do this as soon as possible. Best regards ? Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2418 bytes Desc: not available URL: