From muller at sourceware.org Tue May 21 16:49:47 2024 From: muller at sourceware.org (Pierre Muller) Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 16:49:47 +0200 Subject: x86 VM not accessible anymore on login.opencsw.org Message-ID: Hi, it seems that the three x86 Solaris VM unstable9x, unstable10x and unstable11x are all non-accessible from login.opencsw.org. I found no ssh connection in ps output, ping also says it doesn't get answer, while this works for unstabls9s and unstable10s (unstable11s is also out of reach apparently...) Is this a known issue? Thanks in advance, Pierre Muller From dam at opencsw.org Tue May 21 22:52:23 2024 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 22:52:23 +0200 Subject: x86 VM not accessible anymore on login.opencsw.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1EA0DD32-CA7B-425E-9E87-8F9EEF03748A@opencsw.org> Hi Pierre, > Am 21.05.2024 um 16:49 schrieb Pierre Muller via buildfarm : > it seems that the three x86 Solaris VM unstable9x, unstable10x and unstable11x are all non-accessible from login.opencsw.org. > > I found no ssh connection in ps output, > ping also says it doesn't get answer, > while this works for unstabls9s and unstable10s (unstable11s is also out of reach apparently...) > > Is this a known issue? No, it is not :-/ @Christian: Would you mind taking a look at the respective OpenCSW VMs? Best regards ? Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From dam at opencsw.org Thu May 23 15:51:57 2024 From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen) Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 15:51:57 +0200 Subject: x86 VM not accessible anymore on login.opencsw.org In-Reply-To: <1EA0DD32-CA7B-425E-9E87-8F9EEF03748A@opencsw.org> References: <1EA0DD32-CA7B-425E-9E87-8F9EEF03748A@opencsw.org> Message-ID: Hi Pierre, > Am 21.05.2024 um 22:52 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen via buildfarm : >> Am 21.05.2024 um 16:49 schrieb Pierre Muller via buildfarm : >> it seems that the three x86 Solaris VM unstable9x, unstable10x and unstable11x are all non-accessible from login.opencsw.org. >> >> I found no ssh connection in ps output, >> ping also says it doesn't get answer, >> while this works for unstabls9s and unstable10s (unstable11s is also out of reach apparently...) >> >> Is this a known issue? > > No, it is not :-/ > > @Christian: Would you mind taking a look at the respective OpenCSW VMs? Everything should be fine again. It seems to be some kind of latent networking issue we have not encountered before. Please let me know if you see anything suspicious. Best regards ? Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896 From pierre at freepascal.org Thu May 23 16:14:01 2024 From: pierre at freepascal.org (Pierre Muller) Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 16:14:01 +0200 Subject: x86 VM not accessible anymore on login.opencsw.org In-Reply-To: References: <1EA0DD32-CA7B-425E-9E87-8F9EEF03748A@opencsw.org> Message-ID: <724afa55-0f62-442c-8003-a53ab23b3036@freepascal.org> I confirm that I am able to reconnect to unstable10x. Thank you, Pierre Le 23/05/2024 ? 15:51, Dagobert Michelsen via buildfarm a ?crit?: > Hi Pierre, > >> Am 21.05.2024 um 22:52 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen via buildfarm : >>> Am 21.05.2024 um 16:49 schrieb Pierre Muller via buildfarm : >>> it seems that the three x86 Solaris VM unstable9x, unstable10x and unstable11x are all non-accessible from login.opencsw.org. >>> >>> I found no ssh connection in ps output, >>> ping also says it doesn't get answer, >>> while this works for unstabls9s and unstable10s (unstable11s is also out of reach apparently...) >>> >>> Is this a known issue? >> >> No, it is not :-/ >> >> @Christian: Would you mind taking a look at the respective OpenCSW VMs? > > Everything should be fine again. It seems to be some kind of latent networking issue > we have not encountered before. Please let me know if you see anything suspicious. > > > Best regards > > ? Dago >