[csw-maintainers] Standard for package naming
Philip Brown
phil at bolthole.com
Fri Dec 5 15:10:37 CET 2008
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 08:01:28AM +0100, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> Personally I like *-devel, *-rt, *_devel and *_rt,
i agree
> don't care what is chosen, but whatever we choose the package
> names should be adjust and bugs should be filed for renaming.
I would disagree here. renaming packages (at least the CSWxxx names) is
ugly, becuase of depandancies, and i would prefer they NOT be renamed.
unless they havef zero dependancies.
More information about the maintainers
mailing list