[csw-maintainers] ARCH=all packages

[Alessio]

Philip Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 06:55:02PM +0100, Alessio wrote:
>> Peter Bonivart wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
>>>> It doesnt matter what the user "sees". It matters that the
>>>> description/labelling of the package, match the package.
>>>> The contents of the package, do not match the above description of ARCH=all
>>> That's just your interpretation to make this more complicated than it
>>> needs to be. The package runs on all architectures we support and
>>> should therefor be delivered as one package, that's a much more
>>> reasonable interpretation.
>>>
>>> There's no harm in it and it's simpler for the user to get going.
>> +1
> 
> Are you still a maintainer here Alessio?

no, i didn't give up, as i always said - because i like to be clear - i 
join both the projects waiting to see how things are organized and how 
much *open* are these projects. and of course, i'm not the only 
maintainer in this situation.
actually, the future does not seem to be clear on blastwave nor on 
opencsw (maybe after the IRL meeting...)
whenever i'll leave this project, i'll just announce that.
in the meanwhile if someone wants to take over some of my packages, he's 
of course free to do so.

> I thought that you only packaged for blastwave.org now?

the only package i released recently in the blastwave catalog is 
seamonkey, and i've not yet released it on csw because i still have to 
learn gar.