[csw-maintainers] Runtime linker pathes in GAR
Dagobert Michelsen
dam at opencsw.org
Wed Apr 1 21:35:25 CEST 2009
Hi Chad,
Am 01.04.2009 um 19:15 schrieb Chad Harp:
> I think I need a better understanding of what I should be doing.
> Several of my packages have path problems due to quoting. Should
> I be looking for the correct combinations of variable to fix it,
> or will GAR be fixed to deal with it?
Ok, now here is the rationale why things are as they are now:
- /opt/csw/lib/$ISALIST is needed if and only if libraries are
linked that may contain optimizations. Otherwise it is best to
avoid $ISALIST completely. This can be done by setting
NOISALIST = 1
- I put -R for runtime linker path in LDFLAGS because in the last
discussion LD_OPTIONS was considered bad, as it is always applied
first in linking regardless of other flags. Unfortunately these
flags are passwd through multiple commands, each with evaluation
of the argument. Now $ISALIST looks like a variable and must be
shielded from evaluation by quoting. The amount of quoting depends
on the number of evaluation, e. g. if libtool is used, a custom
Makefile, etc.
The number of quotings can be adjusted by the simple parameter
RUNPATHQUOTE = 1 for single evaluation
RUNPATHQUOTE = 2 for double evaluation
Unfortunately this obviously proved to be not sufficient as the
bug reports from James show.
(BTW, if you are interested: Making the literal '$' as prefix is
_Q = \\\$$\$$ for RUNPATHQUOTE = 1
and
_Q = \\\\\\\$$\$$ for RUNPATHQUOTE = 2
in gar.conf.mk).
- Moving -R to LD_OPTIONS would make things considerable easier,
because the number of evaluations is fixed as it is not processed
by multiple commands. It would just be needed to decide if
$ISALIST should be in or not. NOISALIST is already there for this.
This would conflict with packages already using LD_OPTIONS:
amarok
cups
daimonin
exim
gftp
gphoto2
hatari
hypermail
kdesvn
kile
libgphoto2
lyx
mysql-python
netsnmp
slrn
tsclient
w3m
To be consistent, EXTRA_LD_OPTIONS should be introduced and the
Makefiles adjusted accordingly when the GAR modifications have
been made.
So the GAR integration is possible, but needs some experimentation
in quoting and best use.
Best regards
-- Dago
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20090401/6f35ccbe/attachment.html>
More information about the maintainers
mailing list