[csw-maintainers] New in testing: parallel gzip 'pigz' (pronounced pig-zee)
Dagobert Michelsen
dam at opencsw.org
Thu Dec 31 13:19:54 CET 2009
Hi Trygve,
Am 31.12.2009 um 13:11 schrieb Trygve Laugstøl:
> Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>> Hi Maciej,
>> Am 27.12.2009 um 02:00 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski:
>>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Dagobert Michelsen
>>> <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>>> (...)
>>>> I guess I'll switch package compression in GAR to pigz after
>>>> release.
>>>
>>> What's the status of pigz usage/deployment? Some packages I work
>>> with,
>>> take quite a long time to gzip.
>> It works fine. The place to patch would be bin/mkpackage. I guess
>> it would
>> be best to add usepigz as extra option, but I haven't gotten around
>> to do so.
>> Would you mind patching it in?
>
> I may have asked this before, but is there really a need for
> compressing the packages before they're sent to testing/?
>
> I don't know how you guys work, but I always end up with a long
> command ala this when I'm developing packages:
>
> gunzip -f ~/opencsw/pkgs/CSWfoo-1.2.3*.tar.gz && pkgadd -d ~/
> opencsw/..
>
> So the first think I'm doing after creating the package is to
> uncompress it, just so that I can install it. How about getting
> "make package" create the uncompressed package and "make package.gz"
> create the compressed one?
That would mean the package delivery script to newpkgs/ from Maciej
would do the compression on the fly? Maybe we should talk about
the general workflow in conjunction with this:
<http://wiki.opencsw.org/automated-release-process>
Best regards
-- Dago
More information about the maintainers
mailing list