[csw-maintainers] gnupg dependency error and Mantis configuration

[Sebastian Kayser]

Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> Am 04.02.2009 um 01:01 schrieb Sebastian Kayser:
>> it is, but we need to differentiate here: Mantis now sends out
>> notifications for new bug reports to the relevant package maintainer.
>> You should have gotten the notification i was referring to (that's  
>> what
>> the Mantis and mail logs tell me).
> 
> Mantis is much too silent. Can we please also add a new mailinglist
> bugs@ which receives mail for every single change on any bug on any  
> project?

Mantis-wise this requires a dummy account being assigned to every
project. It's easy for me to do this once, then Phil would need to add
this to his "add a new Mantis project" routine / script. When Ihsan has
the mailing list ready i can go ahead with this.

> And mail the owner of the package on every change on every bug.

This is already the case. Might have stressed the new bug notification
too much.

> And for maintainers not known to be real active mirror any change on any bug
> to maintainers@ so the packages gets adopted fast. "Real active"
> maintainers mean maintainers that post on maintainers@ at least
> once a month.

Again that requires a Mantis dummy account as well as someone who
manages the list of who is real active. Is posting on maintainers@ a
sufficient criteria to label someone real active in terms of bug handling?

For new bugs left unassigned i could have a cronjob fire a reminder
after a certain waiting period.

Sebastian