[csw-maintainers] python question

[Dagobert Michelsen]

Hi Chad,

Am 05.02.2009 um 17:55 schrieb Chad Harp:

> Ben Walton wrote:
>
>> It would be good to keep the 'python' name for the current, but  
>> having
>> an optionally available python25 and then python3k would be good.  At
>> what point does python3k become python and the old python become
>> python26 though?
>
> Can't all of them be handled as modulations within the same gar  
> recipe?

Yes, that is possible. However, the resulting package would be rather  
large,
so I guess it would be best to use multiple packages. And then you don't
need modulations any more...


Best regards

   -- Dago