[csw-maintainers] Minor web site change?

[Peter FELECAN]

Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> writes:

> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Dagobert Michelsen<dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> Why? Usually it is no different packaging for Solaris 9 than for
>> Solaris 8. Why drop Solaris 8 without the need? If there is *any*
>> problem on Solaris 8 it is of course ok to just release for Solaris 9.
>
> We still need to rephrase the claim that Solaris 8 is fully supported
> by Sun. Maybe just remove the part about Sun..?
>
> "...provide quality downloadable binary packages for Sun Solaris 8, 9
> and 10, both Sparc and x86."

We just agreed on a rephrasing which seems alright:

"versions 9 and 10 of Sun Solaris (and 8, when possible) for both
Sparc and x86."

What's the issue with that?
-- 
Peter