[csw-maintainers] cswcommon update request

[Ben Walton]

Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Fri Oct 30 12:53:25 -0400 2009:

> Please just put in the definitions, into whatever uses it for now.
> (ie: define the directories with appropriate permissions)

Maybe this is the better approach anyway?  Any package containing
hooks should include the required hook directories as part of it's
prototype?  I had thought cswcommon was a good spot for these since
presumably there will be multiple implementations.

> there is no harm in having multiple packages define the directories.

Agreed.

> After 6 months to a year has gone by, and there are no further changes
> in "hooks" over that timeperiod, then please re-request a change at
> that time.

Ok.

> PS: there is no reason to "wait", as i've just pointed out above.

Roger that.
-Ben

-- 
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302

GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu
Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20091030/46b1d11e/attachment-0002.asc>