[csw-maintainers] /testing Some X11 proto updates

[Philip Brown]

On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:11 PM, William Bonnet <william at wbonnet.net> wrote:
>
> So do we agree that :
> For proto packages
>        We add a x11_ prefix to all proto files
>        We keep the name of the package unchanged after the prefix
>        Proto packages that are not named like fooproto, are also unchanged
> and prefix by x11_
>        Devel suffix will not be used for these files (even if the contains
> the same kind of files as _devel packages)
>
>        Example : fooproto  -> x11_fooproto
>                  xbarproto -> x11_xbarproto
>                  muf       -> x11_muf
>


with the additional, explicit understanding, that at this time, this
ONLY applies to x11 related prototype packages, and NOTHING else...
yes I am ok with this also