[csw-maintainers] need of an additional directory tree under /opt/csw

[Dagobert Michelsen]

Hi Peter,

Am 18.08.2010 um 16:16 schrieb Peter FELECAN:

> Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> writes:
>
>>> BTW: the incoming Kicad package I'll release will NOT include the
>>> "dev" version of WxWidget 2.8.11 I had to provide internally. So
>>> will it be for Erlang. Funny is that Kicad depends on Erlang, and
>>> both depend on WxWidgets. And I'll have the same case with "boost",
>>> unfortunatly.
>>>
>>> But this still remains subject to change... for the next versions !
>>
>> I think it would be cleanest to have a convention for gcc-compiled c 
>> ++
>> libs,
>> like
>>  CSW<pkg>lib is the Sun Studio version
>>  CSW<pkg>lib-gcc is the gcc compiled version
>> Then there should also be a standard place for these libs. I propose
>>  /opt/csw/lib/gcc/mylib.so
>>  /opt/csw/lib/gcc/amd64/mylib.so
>>  /opt/csw/lib/gcc/64 -> (amd64|sparcv9)
>> These links should be delivered by CSWlibgcccommon.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> +1 this is something that I yearn for since the inception of the  
> project

Ok then, but I would recommend adding gcc-compiled libraries just for  
stuff
needed by other binaries and not start duplicating the whole c++  
libstack
for g++ unconditionally.

Is the directory layout settled then? I would then add GAR support for  
it
to automatically set all pathes right when compiling with g++.


Best regards

   -- Dago