[csw-maintainers] dovecot packaging file collision

[Philip Brown]

On 12/14/10, Sebastian Kayser <skayser at opencsw.org> wrote:
> ...
>> I like option 3 but I don't use sieve.  However, sieve should work just
>> fine this way.
>
> Actually, I don't see a reason - besides the aforementioned hack - for
> the existance of a separate sieve (no additional deps e.g.). Should be
> fine to deprecate dovecot_sieve.
>

Is "Sieve" usable, without deploying dovecot?I vaguely recall that
might have been the reason why it was split out.

Hm. it depends on CSWdovecot, so I would guess not.
Although I dont see any shared-lib deps that would require it?