[csw-maintainers] RFD: Releases and staging proposal
James Lee
james at opencsw.org
Tue Feb 9 20:08:34 CET 2010
On 08/02/10, 20:52:01, Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> wrote regarding
Re: [csw-maintainers] RFD: Releases and staging proposal:
> >> So we should stick to what we have and just drop the proposal?
> >
> > maybe, maybe not.
> > What does the "new" proposal fix?
> > That has not been identified.
> >
> > Seems to me, that should be the first thing in the proposal;
> > identifying "the problem" that the proposal has been created to fix.
> It says so clearly in "background":
> "The main problem is that there are currently no processes that
> might potentially lead to a stable release"
There is a process.
The proposal doesn't say how it is more likely to lead to a release.
> >> The wiki page is a proposal and you propose a change to the proposal.
> >> So how about some discussion on the matter instead of the wording?
> >
> > Why are you objecting to changing the wording? whats the problem?
> > He's suggested a change to the proposal. Are you only open to some
> > kinds of change to it?
> First it says clearly on top of the page "Status: Draft".
The missing word is proposal.
> There are two ways the document can be changed:
> 1. Describe the change in terms of "I propose to change the sentence
> 'abc' to 'def' in paragraph 1 of section 2" and discuss it on
> maintainers@
This the form a proposal should take.
> 2. Change it yourself and discuss it on maintainers@
Ouch.
James.
More information about the maintainers
mailing list