[csw-maintainers] libtool rearranges linker arguments and puts -L/opt/csw/lib last
Dagobert Michelsen
dam at opencsw.org
Wed Jan 13 18:00:12 CET 2010
Hi Roger,
Am 13.01.2010 um 17:51 schrieb Roger Håkansson:
> Roger Håkansson wrote:
>> Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>>> Hi Phil,
>>>
>>> Am 12.01.2010 um 18:32 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Given the issues we constantly hit with libtool, I always find
>>>>> myself
>>>>> wondering if it was ever a benefit instead of a burden. Any
>>>>> grey-beards care to offer some historical perspective on this?
>>>>
>>>> "libtool evil".
>>>>
>>>> this is why our official documented guidelines are,
>>>> "REMOVE .la files from your packages" !!!
>>>
>>> He he, and just now I get a bug report for a package that doesn't
>>> work
>>> without the .la-files:
>>> <http://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=4145>
>> Same as ImageMagick, they use libtool runtime to load internal
>> modules.
>> So MERGE_EXCLUDE_LIBTOOL need to be set to
>> MERGE_EXCLUDE_LIBTOOL ?= $(libdir)/lib.*\.la instead of
>> MERGE_EXCLUDE_LIBTOOL ?= $(libdir)/.*\.la
>
> Note: Thats not a general solution, packages with 64-bit libs or
> packages which have libraries in other places need to have
> MERGE_EXCLUDE_LIBTOOL properly set.
>
> "MERGE_EXCLUDE_LIBTOOL ?= $(libdir).*/lib.*\.la" might be a more
> general solution
I would like to keep the general solution of excluding all libtool-files
and let the maintainer decide this on a case-by-case basis. Including
.la-files should be the exception.
Best regards
-- Dago
More information about the maintainers
mailing list