[csw-maintainers] [RFC] splitting cswclassutils

[Philip Brown]

thank you for officially writing this up.
I second it, with the one amendment of removing the "-"

On Monday, July 12, 2010, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to propose that cswclassutils be split as follows:
>
> 1. Each i/r script pair becomes a separate package named CSWcu-foo
> 2. CSWclassutils becomes an empty package depending on all CSWcu-foo
>    packages.  It will only change when we add/remove a CSWcu-foo
>    package.
>
> This would make bug tracking nicer as it currently burdens Peter B
> even when he's not the author/maintainer of the script in question.
> It should also make coordination of the package easier as one person
> isn't repsonsible for ensuring that all separate script updates have
> been tested before asking for a new release, etc.
>
> (I think this was suggested a few weeks back, but I'm formalizing the
> rfc.)
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks
> -Ben
> --
> Ben Walton
> Systems Programmer - CHASS
> University of Toronto
> C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302
>
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
>