[csw-maintainers] [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs tetex

Philip Brown phil at bolthole.com
Fri Oct 8 01:28:46 CEST 2010

I've always been in favor of it. I think all the gar-related tools
should be put into a nice clean "external" package.
(ie: submitpkg as well)
you'll just have to be creative about name collision on the existing one.

On 10/7/10, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
> [-pkgsubmissions, +maintainers]
> No dia 7 de Outubro de 2010 01:43, Peter FELECAN
> <pfelecan at opencsw.org> escreveu:
>>>> Look at the tail of
>>>> login:/home/pfelecan/CSW/logs/tetex-3.0REV2010.10.05-sparc.log
>>> I looked at it; it doesn't look like checkpkg output to me.[...]
>> Indeed, we may not discuss the same tool. What I'm refering to is
>> /opt/csw/bin/checkpkg supplied by CSWcswutils and which is a creature of
>> Phil...
>> Your creature is installed where, what package supplies-it how to use-it?
> checkpkg is currently available as a svn code checkout only.  What do
> people think about releasing the checkpkg from GAR in a package?
> Maciej
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.

More information about the maintainers mailing list