[csw-maintainers] GAR and checksums

Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski maciej at opencsw.org
Wed Sep 1 10:51:48 CEST 2010


No dia 1 de Setembro de 2010 09:45, Dagobert Michelsen
<dam at opencsw.org> escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> Am 24.08.2010 um 17:34 schrieb Philip Brown:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Ben Walton <bwalton at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Excerpts from Philip Brown's message of Tue Aug 24 09:09:18 -0400 2010:
>>>
>>>> thats fine an all, for "external" files... but at the same time, it
>>>> doesn't make much sense to be running checksums on files which are
>>>> kept in our subversion repository
>>>
>>> This would be an easy fix, as we'd simply drop $(PATCHFILES) from the
>>> $(CHECKSUMFILES) variable, leaving only the tarballs/source files...
>>
>> Would that catch (or rather , skip!) things such as the cswclassutils
>> files.. which are not strictly "patches", yet are not downloaded
>> either?
>
> I have now made a very simple change to GAR, which excludes things in files/
> from checksumming. These files are usually in the repository and don't need
> checksumming. All files pulled in from anywhere else are still checksummed.
> See the change at
>  http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/changeset/10862

Yes, if anything in files/ would not match the repository, GAR would
add the UNCOMMITTED tag.  An operation equivalent to checksumming is
still done in files/.


More information about the maintainers mailing list