[csw-maintainers] Fwd: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_podescapes

[Philip Brown]

On 9/3/10, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> Sorry for top-posting, background below.
>
> CSWpmpodescapes only has three packages that depend on it, two of them
> (CSWpmpodsimple and CSWmailscanner) are mine and already rebuilt
> without it. The third one is an orphaned package from Cory, CSWsvk
> which I have also rebuilt without this dep.
>
> CSWsvk and CSWpmpodsimple are now also up to date, also respun a new
> version of pm_svnmirror to make CSWsvk happy.
>
> If this is ok I will submit these four and you can remove CSWpmpodescapes.
>
> --
> /peter
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com>
> Date: Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 12:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [csw-pkgsubmissions] newpkgs pm_podescapes
> To: pkgsubmissions at lists.opencsw.org
>
>
> On 9/2/10, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
>>> FYI there's a problem with pm_podescapes.
>>>
>>> ERROR 1062 (23000) at line 8: Duplicate entry
>>> '/opt/csw/share/man/man3/Pod::Escapes.3perl' for key 1
>>>
>>>
>>> It's also in perldoc.
>>>
>>> So please either submit an updated perldoc, or remove from podescapes
>>
>> First I went to fix this by removing the man page from podescapes but
>> when I took a closer look I see that 5.10.1 (CSWperl) already contains
>> the latest podescapes (1.04 from 2004-05-07) so I see no need for this
>> package at all.
>>
>> How to proceed now?
>>
>
> well, if Perldoc is part of official 5.10.1 perl, then just officially
> request that the package be removed and marked as obsolete.
> "official", in this case, is probably best pursued as "email the
> maintainers list", so it gets archived properly.
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
>