[csw-maintainers] why mgar prefers 9s to 10s?

[Peter FELECAN]

"Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński" <maciej at opencsw.org> writes:

> 2011/12/3 rupert THURNER <rupert at opencsw.org>:
>> didn't we decide to drop solaris9 compile for new releases a couple of
>> weeks ago?
>
> We changed Solaris 9 support into best effort, it doesn't mean that we
> don't compile for Solaris 9 any more.

>From my point of view, best effort attitude make it optional to deliver
a Solaris 9 package if the packager's best effort is to deliver a
Solaris 10 one. As an adept of Hamilton, I'm all for this minimal
effort.

-- 
Peter