[csw-maintainers] [policy] GPG Signing Key handling

[Ben Walton]

Excerpts from Ben Walton's message of Tue Feb 08 20:44:28 -0500 2011:

Hi Maciej,

Would you please initiate a ballotbin vote for this?  I didn't see any
requests to alter the wording or any other tweaks, so the text below
should be ok.

> The GPG signing key is an important asset for OpenCSW.  As a member of
> OpenCSW, you are asked to make three yes or no selections, one per
> board position, to indicate which, if any, of the board positions you
> feel should hold a copy of the key.  Selecting yes for a position
> indicates that you feel this position (and consequently the person
> holding this position from year to year) should be responsible for
> holding a copy of the key.  Selecting no indicates that you do not
> want this position to hold the key.
> 
> Question 1: Should the Secretary position hold the key?  yes/no
> Question 2: Should the Treasurer position hold the key?  yes/no
> Question 3: Should the President position hold the key?  yes/no

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302