[csw-maintainers] Use of testing*

Maciej Bliziński maciej.blizinski at gmail.com
Wed Jul 6 18:07:28 CEST 2011


Em 06/07/2011 16:25, "Dagobert Michelsen" <dam at opencsw.org> escreveu:
>
> Hi,
>
> Am 05.07.2011 um 21:05 schrieb Ben Walton:
> > Excerpts from Peter Bonivart's message of Tue Jul 05 14:13:08 -0400
2011:
> >>> Darn... I looked in i386. This raises the question of the 2 testing
> >>> platforms: are they identical? Me think that no.
> >>
> >> You're right:
> >
> > These boxes aren't really "maintained" as much as the current and
> > unstable hosts.  They're basically:
> >
> > I need this, so I install it.  That doesn't get applied evenly.  The
> > nature of their use doesn't lend itself to applying updates across the
> > board either, although we could definitely improve that.
>
> I suggest leave it that way for testing* and set up a new set of machines
> for project specific work, like project* similar to what we have.

Checkpkg derives the catalog name (e.g.current or unstable) from the host
name. It will be necessary to set CATALOG_NAME in system wide garrc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20110706/ecaf7537/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the maintainers mailing list