[csw-maintainers] GPG Key Vote -- INVALID ballot

[Maciej Bliziński]

2011/3/2 Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com>:
> On 3/1/11, Philip Brown <phil at bolthole.com> wrote:
>> On 3/1/11, Maciej Bliziński <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Since the vote is not about key revocation, I see no reason to remove
>>> the escrow question.
>>
>> It is more complicated than you might think. Please see my adjusted writeup
>> at
>> http://wiki.opencsw.org/vote-gpgkey
>> for why. That might convince you to move the key escrow vote, to
>> another time, after either more discussion, or alternative technology
>> is proposed.
>> If we had better key escrow tech (William suggested such may exist,
>> but costs $$$), then this wouldnt be a problem.
>>
>
>
> Errr.. you kicked off a new ballot, without any kind of response to my
> email above.
> Did you even read the update?

I did read it.  The key escrow scenarios in the writeup make certain
assumptions, which may or may not be true.  I am confident that escrow
can be done right.

> Since you Once Again decided to kick off a vote, without putting the
> actual ballot up publicly for review beforehand, it is not clear
> whether you did so.

In what form did you expect the ballot for review?  I've given a
description: 4x two-element yes/no radio button.  I've seen no
objections to this ballot design.

Maciej