[csw-maintainers] Status of libidn
Dagobert Michelsen
dam at opencsw.org
Tue Nov 15 09:28:22 CET 2011
Hi Jeffery,
Am 14.11.2011 um 19:01 schrieb Jeffery Small:
> I synced my catalog with http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/csw/current and
> see no new packages have recently been released.
Most updated nowadays go into "unstable" which are later on
pushed to "testing" (the former "current"). This is explained at
http://www.opencsw.org/2011/11/release-branches-adjusted/
https://www.opencsw.org/get-it/releases/
> However, I am finding
> that libidn seem to have regressed from version 1.21,REV=2011.04.25 which
> I have installed here, back to 1.20,REV=2011.03.04 which is listed in the
> catalog. Any thoughts on what is wright and wrong here?
This looks like an error in the package push:
-rw-rw-r-- 5 web web 13269 Mar 10 2011 current/sparc/5.9/libidn-1.20,REV=2011.03.04-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
-rw-r--r-- 3 web web 194693 May 5 2011 current/sparc/5.9/libidn11-1.22,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
-rw-r--r-- 3 web web 105022 May 5 2011 current/sparc/5.9/libidn_dev-1.22,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
-rw-r--r-- 3 web web 31175 May 5 2011 current/sparc/5.9/libidn_utils-1.22,REV=2011.05.05-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
I have made a complete new set and just published it to unstable/, it should be
visible in a couple of hours:
-rw-r--r-- 1 dam csw 175979 Nov 15 08:33 libidn11-1.22,REV=2011.11.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 dam csw 195203 Nov 15 08:19 libidn11-1.22,REV=2011.11.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 dam csw 104607 Nov 15 08:33 libidn_dev-1.22,REV=2011.11.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 dam csw 105229 Nov 15 08:18 libidn_dev-1.22,REV=2011.11.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 dam csw 13280 Nov 15 08:33 libidn_stub-1.22,REV=2011.11.15-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 dam csw 29445 Nov 15 08:33 libidn_utils-1.22,REV=2011.11.15-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 dam csw 31207 Nov 15 08:18 libidn_utils-1.22,REV=2011.11.15-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
BTW, the previous CSWlibidn is now an empty stub and the contents has been split into a library
package, development files and utilities.
Best regards
-- Dago
PS: I remember now, libidn already was a stub although the name does not match the conventional *stub,
the version should be safe to ignore as it pulls in the real packages.
Best regards
-- Dago
--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
More information about the maintainers
mailing list