[csw-maintainers] Inconsistency on package database

[Dagobert Michelsen]

Hi Maciej,

Am 17.03.2012 um 10:28 schrieb Maciej Bliziński:
> Ben Walton wrote:
>> Excerpts from Ben Walton's message of Fri Mar 16 21:00:38 -0400 2012:
>> 
>>> This updated database is now live.  I think I'm also going to switch
>>> the default architecture for this purpose from sparc to i386 as
>>> problem packages tend to be i386-only as opposed to sparc-only.
>> 
>> After comparing unstable/10/sparc with unstable/10/i386, I've made the
>> switch for both web and mantis db maintenance.
> 
> Ideally we would show the union of both, but there currently is no loss
> in showing the x86 packages. 
> 
> = x86 only =
> 
> libhashkit1
> libmemcached
> libmemcached8
> libmemcachedprotocol0
> libmemcachedutil2
> libquadmath0
> mongodb
> 
> = sparc only =
> 
> ncsa_mosaic

Is there a reason why libmemcached and ncsa_mosaic are only for one ISA?

> pm_dbd_sybase_ocs

This is because I didn't have a 32 bit i386 Sybase version.


Best regards

  -- Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896