[csw-maintainers] board vote

[İhsan Doğan]

On 10/09/2012 12:05 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:

>>> @board: Should we unify the process that full maintainers are member by
>>> default?
>>
>> I would say yes.  I can't think of a situation where we'd like to
>> exclude a maintainer from voting by default...and the opposite is easy
>> to handle as the maintainer can simply not vote.  The only
>> precondition for voting, in my understanding, is that the maintainer
>> must have at least one released package...By making these two groups
>> overlap almost entirely, we could generate a voting roster with an SQL
>> query in the web database which would be nice.
>>
>> Ihsan:  I wonder if there is anything in the way the association was
>> founded that precludes extending membership by default?
> 
> The association can not "grab" you, you must apply for it by yourself. We could
> add this to maintainership application that you also apply for the association
> which will be granted after release of the first package.

This would probably the bests solution.




Ihsan

-- 
ihsan at dogan.ch		http://blog.dogan.ch/