[csw-maintainers] Last remaining packages for the openssl migration

[Yann Rouillard]

Hi everyone,

I checked the status of the libssl update (0.9.8 -> 1.0.0) and began to
work on updating a lot of these packages so this whole migration is behind
us.
Here are the remaing packages, sorted by maintainer, that need to be
updated before we can complete the migration.

*Alessio Cervellin ( Retired )*
nmap <http://www.opencsw.org/p/nmap>: I rebuilt it with it fails under
sparc. Following Dago's comment, *I will drop it unless someone objects*.
            The recipe will still be there if someone wants to work on it.

*Andy Igoshin*
nginx <http://www.opencsw.org/p/nginx>: Dago, you already updated the
recipe. Can you update a release a new package ?

*Benny von Mossner ( Sabbatical )*
pound <http://www.opencsw.org/p/pound> and
pound2<http://www.opencsw.org/p/pound2>:
Dago is working on this ones.

*Ben Walton*
libruby1_9_1_1 <http://www.opencsw.org/p/libruby1_9_1_1> and
ruby18<http://www.opencsw.org/p/ruby18>:
Ben will work soon on updating these packages.

*Chad Harp ( Sabbatical )
*gadu <http://www.opencsw.org/p/gadu>: this is a library without reverse
dependency. *I will drop it unless someone objects*.
*Cyrus Mehta ( Missing )
*monit <http://www.opencsw.org/p/monit>: Jorgen might work on it (Jurgen
?). If not, I will release a package

*Dagobert Michelsen*
libarchive2 <http://www.opencsw.org/p/libarchive2> and
libarchive_utils<http://www.opencsw.org/p/libarchive_utils>:
 Dago takes care of it.
libfbopenssl0 <http://www.opencsw.org/p/libfbopenssl0>:  I rebuilt it but I
don't know how to test it.
libneon26_feature <http://www.opencsw.org/p/libneon26_feature>: I think
this package can be dropped. It doesn't have any real reverse depenency.
Dago what do you think ?
lynx <http://www.opencsw.org/p/lynx>: I already updated the recipe and
tested the package. I can directly upload the package if you want. Are you
ok with this Dago ?
pm_netssleay <http://www.opencsw.org/p/pm_netssleay>: Dago takes care of it.
py_m2crypto <http://www.opencsw.org/p/py_m2crypto>: Dago takes care of it.
rdesktop <http://www.opencsw.org/p/rdesktop>: Dago takes care of it.

*Darin Perusich*
conserver <http://www.opencsw.org/p/conserver>: I rebuilt a package close
to the current one. I will mail Darin before uploading it.

*Ihsan Dogan*
ldnsdrill <http://www.opencsw.org/p/ldnsdrill>: this library doesn't have
any reverse dependency. Ihsan, can we drop this one ?
unbound_host <http://www.opencsw.org/p/unbound_host>,
libunbound2<http://www.opencsw.org/p/libunbound2>
 and unbound <http://www.opencsw.org/p/unbound>: Ihsan should take care of
it

*Jake Goerzen:*
flphoto <http://www.opencsw.org/p/flphoto> and
gftp<http://www.opencsw.org/p/gftp>:
Jake, can you update these packages or do you think we can drop them ?

*James Lee:*
fetchmail <http://www.opencsw.org/p/fetchmail>: I didn't have the time to
work on it. Someone interested ?

*Jon Craig:*
ntop <http://www.opencsw.org/p/ntop>: I updated the recipe but it breaks
existing installation because of the gdbm update.
          Jon, do you intend to work on it ?

*Ken Mays ( Retired )
*gimpprint <http://www.opencsw.org/p/gimpprint>: Dago suggested to drop
this package, but it means that we drop gimp as well. *I intend to do that
as gimp doesn't have any active maintainer*. Any objection ?

Only 26 packages remaining ! We can make it ! :)


Yann
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20130407/cf406917/attachment-0001.html>