[csw-maintainers] ctags alternate proposition

[Carsten Grzemba]

Ok, when ectags is ctags, why it is called ectags? ;-)
Please remove CSWctags.



Am 22.03.13 schrieb Jan Holzhueter  <jh at opencsw.org>:
> Hi,
> 
> Am 22.03.13 09:57, schrieb pfelecan:
> > CSWctags supplies the "Exuberant ctags" which is compatible with
> > the etags/ctags provided also by CSWemacs-bin-common.
> > 
> > Currently, both packages override the collision on the
> > /opt/csw/bin/ctags component.
> > 
> > I think that the time to use alternatives has come. Thus, I
> > implemented the needed mechanism for the one provided by the
> > package under my maintenanceship and kindly invite the maintainer
> > of CSWctags to implement his part.
> 
> We have a dopple package here. Since we also do have CSWectags.
> Which looks like the same package.
> I would recommand to just remove the CSWctags package.
> 
> Greetings
> Jan
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20130322/26f84efb/attachment-0001.html>