[csw-maintainers] ctags alternate proposition

[Carsten Grzemba]

I have removed the package CSWctags.

Am 22.03.13 schrieb Peter FELECAN  <pfelecan at opencsw.org>:
> Jan Holzhueter <jh at opencsw.org> writes:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am 22.03.13 09:57, schrieb pfelecan:
> >> CSWctags supplies the "Exuberant ctags" which is compatible with
> >> the etags/ctags provided also by CSWemacs-bin-common.
> >> 
> >> Currently, both packages override the collision on the
> >> /opt/csw/bin/ctags component.
> >> 
> >> I think that the time to use alternatives has come. Thus, I
> >> implemented the needed mechanism for the one provided by the
> >> package under my maintenanceship and kindly invite the maintainer
> >> of CSWctags to implement his part.
> >
> > We have a dopple package here. Since we also do have CSWectags.
> > Which looks like the same package.
> > I would recommand to just remove the CSWctags package.
> 
> Well, I didn't ssaw it. However, I think that the removal should be done
> by its maintainer, if active. Isn't it?
> -- 
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at lists.opencsw.org
> https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
> .:: This mailing list's archive is public. ::.
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20130326/382a7208/attachment.html>