Some packages are missing bundle information, we need to fix it

Dagobert Michelsen dam at
Fri Dec 5 09:23:17 CET 2014


> Am 05.12.2014 um 08:53 schrieb Jan Holzhueter <jh at>:
> Am 05.12.14 um 08:48 schrieb Jan Holzhueter:
>> Am 04.12.14 um 20:42 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński:
>>> 2014-12-04 19:36 GMT+00:00 Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński <maciej at>:
>>>> Affected packages:
>>>> - flac (multiple packages)
>>>> - libmysqlclient18
>>> I have an idea why this might be:
>>> A change in the bundle name for a preexisting package. For example,
>>> moving a package from bundle "flac" to bundle "libflac".
>>> Probable fix: revert to the old name of bundle, upload.
>> It would more be it does not have a bundle tag maybe?
>> The old flac is from 2011?
> Ok they do have bundel names:
> and they do differ:
> Old:
> 'OPENCSW_BUNDLE': 'libflac',
> new:
> but how do you fix that?

The bundle name default to
as used in
for all packages built by one recipe. We didn’t take much care about bundle names because
they were not important in the past. Essentially I think the bundle name should be „flac“
for all packages here. However, I don’t understand why changing bundle names prohibits
propagation and therefor is *bad*.

Best regards

  — Dago

"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2418 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the maintainers mailing list