Some packages are missing bundle information, we need to fix it

[Dagobert Michelsen]

Hi,

> Am 05.12.2014 um 08:53 schrieb Jan Holzhueter <jh at opencsw.org>:
> 
> Am 05.12.14 um 08:48 schrieb Jan Holzhueter:
>> Am 04.12.14 um 20:42 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński:
>>> 2014-12-04 19:36 GMT+00:00 Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński <maciej at opencsw.org>:
>>>> Affected packages:
>>>> - flac (multiple packages)
>>>> - libmysqlclient18
>>> 
>>> I have an idea why this might be:
>>> 
>>> A change in the bundle name for a preexisting package. For example,
>>> moving a package from bundle "flac" to bundle "libflac".
>>> 
>>> Probable fix: revert to the old name of bundle, upload.
>> 
>> It would more be it does not have a bundle tag maybe?
>> The old flac is from 2011?
> 
> Ok they do have bundel names:
> 
> and they do differ:
> 
> Old:
> http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/pkgdb/srv4/e310640cc16d3413ccb7d3f48a137173/
> 
> 'OPENCSW_BUNDLE': 'libflac',
> 
> new:
> 
> http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/pkgdb/srv4/fb36d71dd01c5c3289fbce96d2ffc5b0/
> 
> OPENCSW_BUNDLE': 'flac'
> 
> but how do you fix that?

The bundle name default to
  BUNDLE ?= $(NAME)
as used in
  https://buildfarm.opencsw.org/source/xref/opencsw/csw/mgar/gar/v2/gar.pkg.mk#120
for all packages built by one recipe. We didn’t take much care about bundle names because
they were not important in the past. Essentially I think the bundle name should be „flac“
for all packages here. However, I don’t understand why changing bundle names prohibits
propagation and therefor is *bad*.


Best regards

  — Dago


-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2418 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20141205/ad52c512/attachment.p7s>