OSQA needs updating
Dagobert Michelsen
dam at opencsw.org
Tue Feb 18 14:42:32 CET 2014
Hi Carsten,
Am 18.02.2014 um 14:31 schrieb Carsten Grzemba <grzemba at contac-dt.de>:
> A setup with our current csw packages django 1.6 and the developer tree (it seems to be that there no release versions taged in the last time) of osqa works in my test environment, so I will try now to migrate our OSQA in the new test setup.
This is excellent news! Is it faster for you? I ask because there are a number of other osqa installation
on the internet which are all very fast and I keep the impression it is just because they used a newer
version.
Best regards
— Dago
>
> Carsten
>
> Am 14.02.14 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński <maciej at opencsw.org>:
>>
>> 2014-02-13 15:57 GMT+00:00 Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>:
>> Cool! IIRC there are the following tasks:
>> - update our osqa to the latest trunk
>> - look why our osqa does not work with django 1.4
>> - look why our osqa is so slow
>>
>> Maciej, did I forgot anything?
>>
>> Trying to speed up OSQA might be hard. For now I'd focus on just getting it up to date.
>>
>> I think there's a community effort to maintain OSQA which keeps the code on github.
--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20140218/15ee10d0/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2418 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20140218/15ee10d0/attachment-0001.p7s>
More information about the maintainers
mailing list