From laurent at opencsw.org  Wed Aug  5 09:45:08 2015
From: laurent at opencsw.org (Laurent Blume)
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 09:45:08 +0200
Subject: OpenCSW catalog update report
In-Reply-To: <3mm4Kr5lbDzHW@mail.opencsw.org>
References: <3mm4Kr5lbDzHW@mail.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <55C1BF04.7000303@opencsw.org>

Riccardo,

I would rather like to know what the fuck you think you are doing.

You've been tinkering (ie, breaking) that package, and I had to step in
to fix your mistakes.

Now you are just taking it over, without any polite asking for it, and
AFAICT, without making a single committed change that would require a
reupload.

I'm all good to give packages to other maintainers, since I've got less
time to deal with them myself, even to those who have shown
unwillingness to make their own research.

But in your position, the *very least* you can do is *ask*.

Regards,

Laurent


Le 2015/08/04 20:26 +0200, Catalog Update Notifier a ?crit:
> Catalog update report for laurent at opencsw.org
> Catalog URL: http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/
> 
> You no longer maintain packages:
> - librsvg2_2-2.40.9,REV=2015.07.29-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   In catalogs:
>   - unstable: sparc (5.10, 5.11)
> 
> - librsvg2_2-2.40.9,REV=2015.07.29-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   In catalogs:
>   - unstable: i386 (5.10, 5.11)
> 
> - librsvg_dev-2.40.9,REV=2015.07.29-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   In catalogs:
>   - unstable: i386 (5.10, 5.11)
> 
> - rsvg-2.40.9,REV=2015.07.29-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>   In catalogs:
>   - unstable: i386 (5.10, 5.11)
> 
> - librsvg_dev-2.40.9,REV=2015.07.29-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   In catalogs:
>   - unstable: sparc (5.10, 5.11)
> 
> - rsvg-2.40.9,REV=2015.07.29-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
>   In catalogs:
>   - unstable: sparc (5.10, 5.11)
> 


 

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Aug  5 10:02:23 2015
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:02:23 +0200
Subject: OpenCSW catalog update report
In-Reply-To: <55C1BF04.7000303@opencsw.org>
References: <3mm4Kr5lbDzHW@mail.opencsw.org> <55C1BF04.7000303@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <39422C6F-1F47-4224-9E97-6BF89EBFC7D9@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 05.08.2015 um 09:45 schrieb Laurent Blume <laurent at opencsw.org>:
> I would rather like to know what the fuck you think you are doing.

Civility, gentlemen, please!

> You've been tinkering (ie, breaking) that package, and I had to step in
> to fix your mistakes.
> 
> Now you are just taking it over, without any polite asking for it, and
> AFAICT, without making a single committed change that would require a
> reupload.
> 
> I'm all good to give packages to other maintainers, since I've got less
> time to deal with them myself, even to those who have shown
> unwillingness to make their own research.
> 
> But in your position, the *very least* you can do is *ask*.

I can understand that you are unhappy with packages just taken over
as other maintainers also would be. Probably Riccardo got the impression
that just foreign pushingis not that bad because he had some of my packages
in the past an I am pretty glad to give away packages.

That having said I kindly ask everyone to act as a team, the projects
needs all contributors to work together now more than ever and make the
best use of the few resources we have.


Best regards

  ? Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2418 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20150805/b868ffe7/attachment.p7s>

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Aug  5 20:46:29 2015
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 20:46:29 +0200
Subject: SourceForge Woes
Message-ID: <CB8AD63F-8A41-4D0E-BB97-813AA0E18729@opencsw.org>



Hi folks,

Looks like SF is sold again:

As you may have heard, DHI Group, Inc. has announced that it plans to sell its Slashdot Media business, which includes the Slashdot and SourceForge sites. With Slashdot's and SourceForge's established positions, iconic brands, and loyal and passionate followings of technology professionals in the Open Source community, DHI Group believes Slashdot Media will ultimately have greater opportunity to capitalize on its brand equity plus unique assets and realize greater success as part of a business that is focused primarily on media and software solutions.


Best regards -- Dago
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20150805/9793bfab/attachment.html>

From rmottola at opencsw.org  Thu Aug  6 23:08:46 2015
From: rmottola at opencsw.org (Riccardo Mottola)
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 23:08:46 +0200
Subject: OpenCSW catalog update report
In-Reply-To: <55C1BF04.7000303@opencsw.org>
References: <3mm4Kr5lbDzHW@mail.opencsw.org> <55C1BF04.7000303@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <55C3CCDE.2040405@opencsw.org>

Hi Laurent,


Laurent Blume ha scritto:

> Riccardo,
>
> I would rather like to know what the fuck you think you are doing.
>
> You've been tinkering (ie, breaking) that package, and I had to step in
> to fix your mistakes.

well sorry, the package was broken to begin with. A package where I 
can't type "mgar build" is broken, so I was trying to fix it, not break 
it. it surely means it hadn't been built and updated since a while.

>
> Now you are just taking it over, without any polite asking for it, and
> AFAICT, without making a single committed change that would require a
> reupload.

No single change? apart from it not working, it had to be updated to 
libpng16.
Also, since I update glib, it is a good idea to reresh reverse depencies.

Other packages depending on it were not compiling for problems with it, 
so I thought a refresh would be a good thing. (cairo)

Many reasons thus to refresh a build, don't you think?

Also, I asked you if you were going to upload the package yourself, 
after the fixes you did. I waited a day to see if you would upload it, I 
asked if you were done, I got no answer and just uploaded it since it 
built fine for me.

>
> I'm all good to give packages to other maintainers, since I've got less
> time to deal with them myself, even to those who have shown
> unwillingness to make their own research.
>
> But in your position, the *very least* you can do is *ask*.

No intention to "steal" the package from you! I don't want to rob the 
glory. Perhaps I'm not as touchy about being a maintainer of a certain 
package, since it just get assigned/changed with an upload. I can even 
think it as a bit inconvenient: another person can't step in temporarily.

Sorry,

Riccardo


From rmottola at opencsw.org  Thu Aug  6 23:12:52 2015
From: rmottola at opencsw.org (Riccardo Mottola)
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 23:12:52 +0200
Subject: OpenCSW catalog update report
In-Reply-To: <39422C6F-1F47-4224-9E97-6BF89EBFC7D9@opencsw.org>
References: <3mm4Kr5lbDzHW@mail.opencsw.org> <55C1BF04.7000303@opencsw.org>
	<39422C6F-1F47-4224-9E97-6BF89EBFC7D9@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <55C3CDD4.5010706@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Dagobert Michelsen ha scritto:

> I can understand that you are unhappy with packages just taken over
> as other maintainers also would be. Probably Riccardo got the impression
> that just foreign pushingis not that bad because he had some of my packages
> in the past an I am pretty glad to give away packages.

Well, yes, excatly. I did not intend to "take overy" anything, nor get 
the glory for other packages. At most, it is a burden.

>
> That having said I kindly ask everyone to act as a team, the projects
> needs all contributors to work together now more than ever and make the
> best use of the few resources we have.

It all began with an attempt to just "rebuild" due to changed 
dependencies. I thought that such updates were ok: the problem is that 
there was more need to update than initially planned.

I'll ask the list before certain changes: the next package which I want 
to rebuild is cairo and generally we have other packages depending on 
linpng16 and the split of the -dev package: that rebuild was never 
really done and just more (or less) fixed. At leat that's how I think 
the state is.

Riccardo

From dam at opencsw.org  Sun Aug  9 11:45:20 2015
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2015 11:45:20 +0200
Subject: New package request : gedit
In-Reply-To: <201508070045.t770jKYQ021600@www.opencsw.org>
References: <201508070045.t770jKYQ021600@www.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <F4A8B8E4-E8D5-4A22-9ED2-334AB3066827@opencsw.org>

Hi Michele,

Am 07.08.2015 um 02:45 schrieb via pkgrequests <pkgrequests at lists.opencsw.org>:
> Dear maintainers,
> 
> A new package request has been received from Michele Denber (mailto:denber at mindspring.com). gedit is requested to be added to our catalog.
> 
> Here is the attached message : 
> 
> The gedit currently in OpenCSW is version 2.30.4.  On my Sun Blade 2500 it dumps core with an error \"failed to find gam_server
> Failed to connect to socket /tmp/fam-root/fam-
> 
> (gedit:14837): GLib-GIO-WARNING **: FAMOpen failed, FAMErrno=3\"
> 
> The latest version of gedit is 3.16.  Any chance we could get this updated?  Thanks!

I have not been working on a Solaris desktop for some time now and it is
unlikely that this will start again. I forwarded your request to maintainers,
maybe there is someone who is willing to give it a go.

Apart from that your report sounds more like a problem with SGIs libfam
or better the GAMIN rewrite of it. The version 0.1.10 is still the latest
and the total quality of GAMIN was not the best, so fixing this may require
some debugging. You may also try to go back to the obsoleted SGI implementation
if that works for you.


Best regards

  ? Dago


-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2418 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20150809/8007c177/attachment.p7s>

From grzemba at contac-dt.de  Tue Aug 11 15:39:20 2015
From: grzemba at contac-dt.de (Carsten Grzemba)
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:39:20 +0200
Subject: New package request : gedit
In-Reply-To: <F4A8B8E4-E8D5-4A22-9ED2-334AB3066827@opencsw.org>
References: <201508070045.t770jKYQ021600@www.opencsw.org>
	<F4A8B8E4-E8D5-4A22-9ED2-334AB3066827@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <beeda374530e.55ca1728@contac-dt.de>

I can reproduce this and have seen that not only gedit, also evince cores on Sparc and hang on x86.

Am 09.08.15 11:45 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen  <dam at opencsw.org>: 
> 
> Hi Michele,
> 
> Am 07.08.2015 um 02:45 schrieb via pkgrequests <pkgrequests at lists.opencsw.org>:
> > Dear maintainers,
> > 
> > A new package request has been received from Michele Denber (mailto:denber at mindspring.com <denber at mindspring.com>). gedit is requested to be added to our catalog.
> > 
> > Here is the attached message : 
> > 
> > The gedit currently in OpenCSW is version 2.30.4. On my Sun Blade 2500 it dumps core with an error \"failed to find gam_server
> > Failed to connect to socket /tmp/fam-root/fam-
> > 
> > (gedit:14837): GLib-GIO-WARNING **: FAMOpen failed, FAMErrno=3\"
> > 
> > The latest version of gedit is 3.16. Any chance we could get this updated? Thanks!
> 
> I have not been working on a Solaris desktop for some time now and it is
> unlikely that this will start again. I forwarded your request to maintainers,
> maybe there is someone who is willing to give it a go.
> 
> Apart from that your report sounds more like a problem with SGIs libfam
> or better the GAMIN rewrite of it. The version 0.1.10 is still the latest
> and the total quality of GAMIN was not the best, so fixing this may require
> some debugging. You may also try to go back to the obsoleted SGI implementation
> if that works for you.
> 
> 
> Best regards
> 
>  ? Dago
> 
> 
> -- 
> "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
> and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20150811/119d17a1/attachment.html>

From grzemba at contac-dt.de  Wed Aug 12 08:44:39 2015
From: grzemba at contac-dt.de (Carsten Grzemba)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 08:44:39 +0200
Subject: where is gnome_doc_utils, was Re: New package request : gedit
In-Reply-To: <F4A8B8E4-E8D5-4A22-9ED2-334AB3066827@opencsw.org>
References: <201508070045.t770jKYQ021600@www.opencsw.org>
	<F4A8B8E4-E8D5-4A22-9ED2-334AB3066827@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <bddcb4c556d2.55cb0777@contac-dt.de>

For respin gedit we need xml2po (package gnome_doc_utils) but I can't found this anywhere?

Am 09.08.15 11:45 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen  <dam at opencsw.org>: 
> 
> Hi Michele,
> 
> Am 07.08.2015 um 02:45 schrieb via pkgrequests <pkgrequests at lists.opencsw.org>:
> > Dear maintainers,
> > 
> > A new package request has been received from Michele Denber (mailto:denber at mindspring.com <denber at mindspring.com>). gedit is requested to be added to our catalog.
> > 
> > Here is the attached message : 
> > 
> > The gedit currently in OpenCSW is version 2.30.4. On my Sun Blade 2500 it dumps core with an error \"failed to find gam_server
> > Failed to connect to socket /tmp/fam-root/fam-
> > 
> > (gedit:14837): GLib-GIO-WARNING **: FAMOpen failed, FAMErrno=3\"
> > 
> > The latest version of gedit is 3.16. Any chance we could get this updated? Thanks!
> 
> I have not been working on a Solaris desktop for some time now and it is
> unlikely that this will start again. I forwarded your request to maintainers,
> maybe there is someone who is willing to give it a go.
> 
> Apart from that your report sounds more like a problem with SGIs libfam
> or better the GAMIN rewrite of it. The version 0.1.10 is still the latest
> and the total quality of GAMIN was not the best, so fixing this may require
> some debugging. You may also try to go back to the obsoleted SGI implementation
> if that works for you.
> 
> 
> Best regards
> 
>  ? Dago
> 
> 
> -- 
> "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
> and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20150812/4ce47dad/attachment.html>

From dam at opencsw.org  Wed Aug 12 12:24:37 2015
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 12:24:37 +0200
Subject: where is gnome_doc_utils, was Re: New package request : gedit
In-Reply-To: <bddcb4c556d2.55cb0777@contac-dt.de>
References: <201508070045.t770jKYQ021600@www.opencsw.org>
	<F4A8B8E4-E8D5-4A22-9ED2-334AB3066827@opencsw.org>
	<bddcb4c556d2.55cb0777@contac-dt.de>
Message-ID: <1ED23BAA-583A-40FC-9D8C-E6AB1E581C55@opencsw.org>

Hi Carsten,

Am 12.08.2015 um 08:44 schrieb Carsten Grzemba <grzemba at contac-dt.de>:
> For respin gedit we need xml2po (package gnome_doc_utils) but I can't found this anywhere?

I can?t find a reference that it is needed. Can you please list what you have
done and where it is failing?


Best regards

  ? Dago

> 
> Am 09.08.15 11:45 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org>:
>> Hi Michele,
>> 
>> Am 07.08.2015 um 02:45 schrieb via pkgrequests <pkgrequests at lists.opencsw.org>:
>> > Dear maintainers,
>> > 
>> > A new package request has been received from Michele Denber (mailto:denber at mindspring.com). gedit is requested to be added to our catalog.
>> > 
>> > Here is the attached message : 
>> > 
>> > The gedit currently in OpenCSW is version 2.30.4.  On my Sun Blade 2500 it dumps core with an error \"failed to find gam_server
>> > Failed to connect to socket /tmp/fam-root/fam-
>> > 
>> > (gedit:14837): GLib-GIO-WARNING **: FAMOpen failed, FAMErrno=3\"
>> > 
>> > The latest version of gedit is 3.16.  Any chance we could get this updated?  Thanks!
>> 
>> I have not been working on a Solaris desktop for some time now and it is
>> unlikely that this will start again. I forwarded your request to maintainers,
>> maybe there is someone who is willing to give it a go.
>> 
>> Apart from that your report sounds more like a problem with SGIs libfam
>> or better the GAMIN rewrite of it. The version 0.1.10 is still the latest
>> and the total quality of GAMIN was not the best, so fixing this may require
>> some debugging. You may also try to go back to the obsoleted SGI implementation
>> if that works for you.
>> 
>> 
>> Best regards
>> 
>>   ? Dago
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
>> and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
>> 

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2418 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20150812/1c17399e/attachment-0001.p7s>

From rupert at opencsw.org  Sun Aug 16 14:39:39 2015
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 14:39:39 +0200
Subject: Fwd: mercurial checkpkg
In-Reply-To: <mailman.6017.1439728711.1178.maintainers@lists.opencsw.org>
References: <mailman.6017.1439728711.1178.maintainers@lists.opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <CAJs9aZ-f9HpkDtQxkkpM18M9cpHdxwWCbDH5ARGRD1GOCeJKFA@mail.gmail.com>

hi,

the mercurial makefile contains:

CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWmercurial += pkgname-does-not-start-with-CSWpy-
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWmercurial += catalogname-does-not-start-with-py_

the error message is:

CSWmercurial:
 * The package installs files into /opt/csw/lib/python. For example,
   '/opt/csw/lib/python2.6/site-packages'. However, the pkgname doesn't start
   with 'CSWpy-'.
 * The package installs files into /opt/csw/lib/python. For example,
   '/opt/csw/lib/python2.6/site-packages'. However, the catalogname doesn't
   start with 'py_'.
If any of the reported errors were false positives, you can override them
pasting the lines below to the GAR recipe.
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWmercurial += pkginfo-opencsw-repository-uncommitted

rupert.

From maciej at opencsw.org  Sun Aug 16 22:21:34 2015
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 20:21:34 +0000
Subject: mercurial checkpkg
In-Reply-To: <CAJs9aZ-f9HpkDtQxkkpM18M9cpHdxwWCbDH5ARGRD1GOCeJKFA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.6017.1439728711.1178.maintainers@lists.opencsw.org>
	<CAJs9aZ-f9HpkDtQxkkpM18M9cpHdxwWCbDH5ARGRD1GOCeJKFA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALtRa-7zYYw0byTQBJQCi5Ty-Pcdi-Yb0PXVnH3u7hn4hPuLLA@mail.gmail.com>

Have you done mgar ci -m "Did this and that"?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20150816/9b263721/attachment.html>

From dam at opencsw.org  Mon Aug 17 09:34:31 2015
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:34:31 +0200
Subject: mercurial checkpkg
In-Reply-To: <CAJs9aZ-f9HpkDtQxkkpM18M9cpHdxwWCbDH5ARGRD1GOCeJKFA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.6017.1439728711.1178.maintainers@lists.opencsw.org>
	<CAJs9aZ-f9HpkDtQxkkpM18M9cpHdxwWCbDH5ARGRD1GOCeJKFA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5C905283-E125-4EFE-B332-4B8F0AE73710@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 16.08.2015 um 14:39 schrieb rupert THURNER <rupert at opencsw.org>:
> the mercurial makefile contains:
> 
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWmercurial += pkgname-does-not-start-with-CSWpy-
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWmercurial += catalogname-does-not-start-with-py_
> 
> the error message is:
> 
> CSWmercurial:
> * The package installs files into /opt/csw/lib/python. For example,
>   '/opt/csw/lib/python2.6/site-packages'. However, the pkgname doesn't start
>   with 'CSWpy-'.
> * The package installs files into /opt/csw/lib/python. For example,
>   '/opt/csw/lib/python2.6/site-packages'. However, the catalogname doesn't
>   start with 'py_'.
> If any of the reported errors were false positives, you can override them
> pasting the lines below to the GAR recipe.
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWmercurial += pkginfo-opencsw-repository-uncommitted

This looks pretty much ok, the above two are noticed, but as (overridden) warnings.


Best regards

  ? Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2418 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20150817/177b5379/attachment.p7s>

From rupert at opencsw.org  Mon Aug 17 20:52:31 2015
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 20:52:31 +0200
Subject: mercurial checkpkg
In-Reply-To: <CAJs9aZ-W6Q-nckq-TP+OLN2jcGSqc9_ezMDxsApwvn9JYACMCg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.6017.1439728711.1178.maintainers@lists.opencsw.org>
	<CAJs9aZ-f9HpkDtQxkkpM18M9cpHdxwWCbDH5ARGRD1GOCeJKFA@mail.gmail.com>
	<5C905283-E125-4EFE-B332-4B8F0AE73710@opencsw.org>
	<CAJs9aZ-W6Q-nckq-TP+OLN2jcGSqc9_ezMDxsApwvn9JYACMCg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJs9aZ8m0PPavGXqtO2WJs+GOmhL1Z=MxqfkQk5TsmSDno70bQ@mail.gmail.com>

> On Aug 17, 2015 9:34 AM, "Dagobert Michelsen" <dam at opencsw.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am 16.08.2015 um 14:39 schrieb rupert THURNER <rupert at opencsw.org>:
> > > the mercurial makefile contains:
> > >
> > > CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWmercurial += pkgname-does-not-start-with-CSWpy-
> > > CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWmercurial += catalogname-does-not-start-with-py_
> > >
> > > the error message is:
> > >
> > > CSWmercurial:
> > > * The package installs files into /opt/csw/lib/python. For example,
> > >   '/opt/csw/lib/python2.6/site-packages'. However, the pkgname
doesn't start
> > >   with 'CSWpy-'.
> > > * The package installs files into /opt/csw/lib/python. For example,
> > >   '/opt/csw/lib/python2.6/site-packages'. However, the catalogname
doesn't
> > >   start with 'py_'.
> > > If any of the reported errors were false positives, you can override
them
> > > pasting the lines below to the GAR recipe.
> > > CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWmercurial +=
pkginfo-opencsw-repository-uncommitted
> >
> > This looks pretty much ok, the above two are noticed, but as
(overridden) warnings.
>
It does stops with that error. Same happens for edgewall trac. But not for
cmake or subvertpy. Maciej said that might be because my command prompt has
a newline.

Best
Rupert
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20150817/2c3c75aa/attachment.html>

From maciej at opencsw.org  Mon Aug 17 23:53:46 2015
From: maciej at opencsw.org (=?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=28Matchek=29_Blizi=C5=84ski?=)
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:53:46 +0000
Subject: mercurial checkpkg
In-Reply-To: <CAJs9aZ8m0PPavGXqtO2WJs+GOmhL1Z=MxqfkQk5TsmSDno70bQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.6017.1439728711.1178.maintainers@lists.opencsw.org>
	<CAJs9aZ-f9HpkDtQxkkpM18M9cpHdxwWCbDH5ARGRD1GOCeJKFA@mail.gmail.com>
	<5C905283-E125-4EFE-B332-4B8F0AE73710@opencsw.org>
	<CAJs9aZ-W6Q-nckq-TP+OLN2jcGSqc9_ezMDxsApwvn9JYACMCg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJs9aZ8m0PPavGXqtO2WJs+GOmhL1Z=MxqfkQk5TsmSDno70bQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALtRa-4d0M3_neMgmxFbNWQ=d4DnYqnHTXCj83=_kOgbCq98EA@mail.gmail.com>

A seg, 17/08/2015, 19:52, rupert THURNER <rupert at opencsw.org> escreveu:


It does stops with that error. Same happens for edgewall trac. But not for
cmake or subvertpy. Maciej said that might be because my command prompt has
a newline.

No, you misunderstood me, Rupert. I saw a space in between the output of
"svn status" and the next command prompt. The space could come from svn or
from your ps1. I do not know which one it is and I was trying to ask you
about it.

Rupert, did you attempt any debugging? If so, what did you try?

-+Maciej
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20150817/1d20d91c/attachment.html>

From rupert at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 18 08:31:09 2015
From: rupert at opencsw.org (rupert THURNER)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 08:31:09 +0200
Subject: mercurial checkpkg
In-Reply-To: <CALtRa-4d0M3_neMgmxFbNWQ=d4DnYqnHTXCj83=_kOgbCq98EA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.6017.1439728711.1178.maintainers@lists.opencsw.org>
	<CAJs9aZ-f9HpkDtQxkkpM18M9cpHdxwWCbDH5ARGRD1GOCeJKFA@mail.gmail.com>
	<5C905283-E125-4EFE-B332-4B8F0AE73710@opencsw.org>
	<CAJs9aZ-W6Q-nckq-TP+OLN2jcGSqc9_ezMDxsApwvn9JYACMCg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJs9aZ8m0PPavGXqtO2WJs+GOmhL1Z=MxqfkQk5TsmSDno70bQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALtRa-4d0M3_neMgmxFbNWQ=d4DnYqnHTXCj83=_kOgbCq98EA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJs9aZ8BsRFK=RJ_f1RQt5EO7XNPWzxAdbpuxSF-gO_AUiujHw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski
<maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>
> A seg, 17/08/2015, 19:52, rupert THURNER <rupert at opencsw.org> escreveu:
>
>
> It does stops with that error. Same happens for edgewall trac. But not for
> cmake or subvertpy. Maciej said that might be because my command prompt has
> a newline.
>
> No, you misunderstood me, Rupert. I saw a space in between the output of
> "svn status" and the next command prompt. The space could come from svn or
> from your ps1. I do not know which one it is and I was trying to ask you
> about it.
>
> Rupert, did you attempt any debugging? If so, what did you try?

no debugging from my side (at least not deliberate). i re-run "mgar
remerge replatforms" now without using "screen" and it worked. so i
guess we can forget about it. if i have time i will try again next
release with screen to see if that had an influence. sorry for
bothering you *blush*.

best,
rupert

From dam at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 18 09:16:52 2015
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 09:16:52 +0200
Subject: mercurial checkpkg
In-Reply-To: <CAJs9aZ8BsRFK=RJ_f1RQt5EO7XNPWzxAdbpuxSF-gO_AUiujHw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.6017.1439728711.1178.maintainers@lists.opencsw.org>
	<CAJs9aZ-f9HpkDtQxkkpM18M9cpHdxwWCbDH5ARGRD1GOCeJKFA@mail.gmail.com>
	<5C905283-E125-4EFE-B332-4B8F0AE73710@opencsw.org>
	<CAJs9aZ-W6Q-nckq-TP+OLN2jcGSqc9_ezMDxsApwvn9JYACMCg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJs9aZ8m0PPavGXqtO2WJs+GOmhL1Z=MxqfkQk5TsmSDno70bQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALtRa-4d0M3_neMgmxFbNWQ=d4DnYqnHTXCj83=_kOgbCq98EA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJs9aZ8BsRFK=RJ_f1RQt5EO7XNPWzxAdbpuxSF-gO_AUiujHw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1720E9F8-2547-4DBC-9983-E7166BBC342B@opencsw.org>

Hi,

Am 18.08.2015 um 08:31 schrieb rupert THURNER <rupert at opencsw.org>:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski
> <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> 
>> A seg, 17/08/2015, 19:52, rupert THURNER <rupert at opencsw.org> escreveu:
>> 
>> It does stops with that error. Same happens for edgewall trac. But not for
>> cmake or subvertpy. Maciej said that might be because my command prompt has
>> a newline.
>> 
>> No, you misunderstood me, Rupert. I saw a space in between the output of
>> "svn status" and the next command prompt. The space could come from svn or
>> from your ps1. I do not know which one it is and I was trying to ask you
>> about it.
>> 
>> Rupert, did you attempt any debugging? If so, what did you try?
> 
> no debugging from my side (at least not deliberate). i re-run "mgar
> remerge replatforms" now without using "screen" and it worked. so i
> guess we can forget about it. if i have time i will try again next
> release with screen to see if that had an influence. sorry for
> bothering you *blush*.

The output of ?svn status? must be completely empty. Maybe a terminal setting
inside screen produces an extra newline?


Best regards

  ? Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2418 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20150818/ca69caf0/attachment.p7s>

From pfelecan at opencsw.org  Tue Aug 18 19:33:43 2015
From: pfelecan at opencsw.org (Peter FELECAN)
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 19:33:43 +0200
Subject: mercurial checkpkg
In-Reply-To: <1720E9F8-2547-4DBC-9983-E7166BBC342B@opencsw.org> (Dagobert
	Michelsen's message of "Tue, 18 Aug 2015 09:16:52 +0200")
References: <mailman.6017.1439728711.1178.maintainers@lists.opencsw.org>
	<CAJs9aZ-f9HpkDtQxkkpM18M9cpHdxwWCbDH5ARGRD1GOCeJKFA@mail.gmail.com>
	<5C905283-E125-4EFE-B332-4B8F0AE73710@opencsw.org>
	<CAJs9aZ-W6Q-nckq-TP+OLN2jcGSqc9_ezMDxsApwvn9JYACMCg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJs9aZ8m0PPavGXqtO2WJs+GOmhL1Z=MxqfkQk5TsmSDno70bQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALtRa-4d0M3_neMgmxFbNWQ=d4DnYqnHTXCj83=_kOgbCq98EA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJs9aZ8BsRFK=RJ_f1RQt5EO7XNPWzxAdbpuxSF-gO_AUiujHw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1720E9F8-2547-4DBC-9983-E7166BBC342B@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <x6a8topklk.fsf@opencsw.org>

Dagobert Michelsen <dam at opencsw.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Am 18.08.2015 um 08:31 schrieb rupert THURNER <rupert at opencsw.org>:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizi?ski
>> <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> A seg, 17/08/2015, 19:52, rupert THURNER <rupert at opencsw.org> escreveu:
>>> 
>>> It does stops with that error. Same happens for edgewall trac. But not for
>>> cmake or subvertpy. Maciej said that might be because my command prompt has
>>> a newline.
>>> 
>>> No, you misunderstood me, Rupert. I saw a space in between the output of
>>> "svn status" and the next command prompt. The space could come from svn or
>>> from your ps1. I do not know which one it is and I was trying to ask you
>>> about it.
>>> 
>>> Rupert, did you attempt any debugging? If so, what did you try?
>> 
>> no debugging from my side (at least not deliberate). i re-run "mgar
>> remerge replatforms" now without using "screen" and it worked. so i
>> guess we can forget about it. if i have time i will try again next
>> release with screen to see if that had an influence. sorry for
>> bothering you *blush*.
>
> The output of ?svn status? must be completely empty. Maybe a terminal setting
> inside screen produces an extra newline?

But [[:blank:]]* is "totally empty" from the svn command output side, isn't it?
-- 
Peter