problem with versioned libpng16 dev respin

Dagobert Michelsen dam at opencsw.org
Wed May 13 16:57:08 CEST 2015


Hi Riccardo,

> Am 13.05.2015 um 16:35 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <rmottola at opencsw.org>:
> 
> Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>> Are you uploading CSWlibpng16-16 together with CSWlibpng16-dev ? You need to upload both at the same
>> time or the database won’t know the destination of the .so symlink.
> I tried to upload all regenereated 1.6 packages:
> /opt/csw/bin/csw-upload-pkg is a wrapper, running /home/rmottola/opencsw/.buildsys/v2/bin/csw-upload-pkg libpng16_16-1.6.16,REV=2015.05.11-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libpng16_16-1.6.16,REV=2015.05.11-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libpng16_16-1.6.16,REV=2015.05.11-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libpng16_16-1.6.16,REV=2015.05.11-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libpng16_dev-1.6.16,REV=2015.05.11-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libpng16_dev-1.6.16,REV=2015.05.11-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libpng16_dev-1.6.16,REV=2015.05.11-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libpng16_dev-1.6.16,REV=2015.05.11-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libpng16_16-1.6.16,REV=2015.05.11-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libpng16_16-1.6.16,REV=2015.05.11-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libpng16_16-1.6.16,REV=2015.05.11-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libpng16_16-1.6.16,REV=2015.05.11-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libpng16_dev-1.6.16,REV=2015.05.11-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libpng16_dev-1.6.16,REV=2015.05.11-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libpng16_dev-1.6.16,REV=2015.05.11-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libpng16_dev-1.6.16,REV=2015.05.11-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libpng_dev_stub-1.6.16,REV=2015.05.11-SunOS5.10-all-CSW.pkg.gz libpng_dev_stub-1.6.16,REV=2015.05.11-SunOS5.9-all-CSW.pkg.gz libpng_utils-1.6.16,REV=2015.05.11-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libpng_utils-1.6.16,REV=2015.05.11-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz libpng_utils-1.6.16,REV=2015.05.11-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz libpng_utils-1.6.16,REV=2015.05.11-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
> 
> My question is: why pentium_pro in /opt/csw/lib/pentium_pro/libpng16.so.16.16.0' ?
> Is this a special rearrangement happening on solaris 11?

No, I would consider this an error. Which are the directories from which you built the packages?
Please commit what you have and I’ll have a look.


Best regards

  — Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2418 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20150513/418d4b6c/attachment.p7s>


More information about the maintainers mailing list