gnutls - solaris9 x86 build

[Dagobert Michelsen]

Hi Riccardo,

Am 01.10.2015 um 14:58 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <rmottola at opencsw.org>:
> having backported the texinfo patch, now I have everything fine on solaris 9 and 10... sparc!
> So most dependencies should be right in the receipe.
> 
> On 2015-09-30 21:44:58 +0200 Riccardo Mottola <rmottola at opencsw.org> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> I'm still struggling to rebuild gnutls on solaris9. I tried running on x86 instead of sparc and get this:
>> /home/rmottola/opencsw/.buildsys/v2/gar//gar.conf.mk:555: *** The ISA 'amd64' can not be build on this kernel with the arch 'i386'.  Stop.
>> gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/rmottola/opencsw/gnutls/trunk'
>> I thus think there is something wrong with the receipe?
>> could this be the problem?
>> BUILD64_LIBS_ONLY = 1
> 
> Instead of "mgar build" directly on 9x, I issued "mgar platforms" and then apparently with some magic everything builds, but I do get at the end:
> 
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibgnutls26 += soname-not-found|libgcc_s.so.1|is|needed|by|opt/csw/lib/amd64/libgnutlsxx.so.27.0.0
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibgnutls26 += soname-not-found|libgcc_s.so.1|is|needed|by|opt/csw/lib/amd64/libgnutls-extra.so.26.22.6
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibgnutls26 += soname-not-found|libgcc_s.so.1|is|needed|by|opt/csw/lib/amd64/libgnutls.so.26.22.6
> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibgnutls26 += soname-not-found|libstdc++.so.6|is|needed|by|opt/csw/lib/amd64/libgnutlsxx.so.27.0.0
> 
> and this makes me shudder.. what is going on? amd64 build on intel 9... not finding the gcc library?
> 
> That said, I did run
> find /opt/csw/lib -name libgcc_s.so.\*
> 
> on solaris 9s:
> /opt/csw/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
> /opt/csw/lib/libgcc_s.so.2.95.3
> /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libgcc_s.so.1
> 
> on solaris10s:
> /opt/csw/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
> /opt/csw/lib/sparcv9/libgcc_s.so.1
> 
> looks fine, except for the old 2.95 library
> 
> on solaris 9x?
> /opt/csw/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
> /opt/csw/lib/libgcc_s.so.2.95.3
> 
> well, the 64bit is missing. But obvious, it is not a 64bit os! :)
> And now?
> I remembr you told me there was some kind of trick about faking 64bit on solaris9.. but not that it actually attempted to build.
> What is wrong with this receipe?

The issue is that Solaris 9 x86 is 32 bit only - there is no 64 bit Kernel!
We usually made packages for Solaris 9 with 32 bit that also included 64 bit
that would be used on Solaris 10 when there was no dedicated package for
Solaris 10 in addition to the Solaris 9 package.

When you have separate packages for Solaris 9 and 10 you should disable
64 bit for Solaris 9 x86 with a snippet like this:

> # Enable 64 bits, but not for Solaris 9 x86
> BUILD64_5.9_sparc  = 1
> BUILD64_5.10_sparc = 1
> BUILD64_5.9_i386   =
> BUILD64_5.10_i386  = 1
> BUILD64 = $(BUILD64_$(GAROSREL)_$(GARCH))


Best regards

  — Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2418 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20151001/66074fd4/attachment-0001.p7s>