From dam at opencsw.org  Fri Jul 28 10:03:56 2017
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 10:03:56 +0200
Subject: libidn - libidn2
In-Reply-To: <8eca9775-dfe7-696c-90a7-034242fc3e9d@opencsw.org>
References: <8eca9775-dfe7-696c-90a7-034242fc3e9d@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <2057D8BC-EC23-44B9-97FA-36159C55DD77@opencsw.org>

Hi Riccardo,

Am 28.07.2017 um 02:04 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <rmottola at opencsw.org>:
> I need libidn2 ... to update gnutls :(
> Actually, I force it to use libidn 1 or disable it alltogether to see if I get forward with it, but maybe it is not the best.
> 
> we have libidn 1, but no libidn 2....
> should I start a new project? a branch? what would you prefer ?

What do you mean? We have Libidn 1.33 as CSWlibidn11 and Libidn2 0.10 as CSWlibidn2-0.
Please note that Libidn and Libidn2 are completely different libraries, I didn?t get this
either and asked Simon Josefsson and this is what he replied to me :-)

Am 02.11.2016 um 09:41 schrieb Simon Josefsson <simon at josefsson.org>:
> Hi Dagobert,
> 
> libidn and libidn2 are two different projects, they complement each
> other rather then compete.  libidn is for IDNA2003 and libidn2 is for
> IDNA2008.  For most purposes, libidn is what you want.


And that is also the reason why we have CSWlibidn-dev and CSWlibidn2-dev.


Best regards

  ? Dago

--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20170728/8402fd07/attachment.asc>