mgar stuck applying patch

Jake Goerzen jgoerzen at opencsw.org
Wed Jan 3 18:35:46 CET 2018


Hi Jan and Dago,
Yes, that was it.  The recipe now builds.

Thanks,
Jake


On 01/03/18 01:39, Jan Holzhueter via maintainers wrote:
> Hi,
> try with NOGITPATCH += 1
> git stuff might be broken maybe?
>
>
>
>
> Am 03.01.18 um 10:34 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen via maintainers:
>> Hi Jake,
>>
>> Am 03.01.2018 um 04:31 schrieb Jake Goerzen <jgoerzen at opencsw.org>:
>>> I have a recipe I can build unstable9x successfully, but on unstable9s it gets stuck at applying patch…
>> I can reproduce this. It looks like an issue in the gluecode during fork:
>>
>> unstable9s% pstack 27002
>> 27002:  git am --ignore-space-change --ignore-whitespace /home/dam/mgar/pkg/to
>>   ff3dcba4 lwp_park (0, 0, 0)
>>   ff3d3d3c s9_lwp_park (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) + 6c
>>   ff3dcb08 s9_handler (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) + 90
>>   fec811bc mutex_lock_queue (fec98c04, 0, fed82408, 0, 0, 0) + 104
>>   fec818cc mutex_lock_internal (0, 0, fec90000, 0, 0, 0) + 610
>>   fed58a28 atfork_append (0, 0, fedd6044, fed82404, fed82408, 0) + 4
>>   fed58b94 pthread_atfork (0, 0, fedd6044, ffe77590, 188800, 188a2c) + 24
>>   fedd6114 solaris_locking_setup (fedd6044, 0, fedd5fe0, 400, fef5f140, 400) + 90
>>   fed58d70 run_postfork_child (fed823f0, fed82408, 2526c, fec7cfa8, 5, 0) + 24
>>   fec7cfa8 fork1    (1, 1afc8, 0, 0, 0, 0) + f4
>>   fec7d05c fork     (0, 4, ffbff3c0, 223544, 1b5d80, 0) + 28
>>   00151534 start_command (ffbff4a4, 0, 9, 0, 0, 0) + 220
>>   00151b80 run_command (ffbff4a4, 0, 20, 0, 8, 8) + 4
>>   00151cac run_command_v_opt (ffbff660, 28, 1e6c00, 223544, 1b5d80, 0) + 14
>>   000212a8 ???????? (ffbff660, ffffffff, 1fc000, 223544, 1aadd0, 0)
>>   00021308 ???????? (ffbff63c, ffbff640, ffbffa73, 1dadc8, 0, 1b5000)
>>   00021448 main     (ffbff660, ffbff63c, 1fc818, 1b6fe8, ffbff640, ffbff7a4) + f8
>>   0001f840 _start   (0, ffbff65c, 1, ff3dca78, ff3ee850, ff3ee000) + 108
>>
>>
>> Maybe there is a patch, but I am a bit reluctant as this ususally means raising libc-level.
>>
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>>    — Dago
>>



More information about the maintainers mailing list