From rmottola at opencsw.org Tue Mar 13 11:54:42 2018 From: rmottola at opencsw.org (Riccardo Mottola) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:54:42 +0100 Subject: ICU update In-Reply-To: References: <62d3e0ff575560dda6a8fec67447cc42@Koreander.local> Message-ID: <87128902-f592-3005-1077-5d3da7aa2092@opencsw.org> Hi Dagobert, On 02/20/18 20:43, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Riccardo, > now my last issue: I have these: >> >> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibicu-dev += >> file-needed-but-no-package-satisfies-it|/opt/csw/lib/icu/current/Makefile.inc|CSWlibicu-dev|contains|symlink|/opt/csw/lib/icu/Makefile.inc|which|needs|the|target|file:|/opt/csw/lib/icu/current/Makefile.inc >> CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibicu-dev += >> file-needed-but-no-package-satisfies-it|/opt/csw/lib/icu/current/pkgdata.inc|CSWlibicu-dev|contains|symlink|/opt/csw/lib/icu/pkgdata.inc|which|needs|the|target|file:|/opt/csw/lib/icu/current/pkgdata.inc > > And? Is pkgroot/opt/csw/lib/icu/current/pkgdata.inc there? I fear not: find . -name pkgdata.inc | grep pkgroot ./work/solaris9-i386/pkgroot/opt/csw/lib/icu/pkgdata.inc ./work/solaris9-i386/pkgroot/opt/csw/lib/icu/50.1.2/pkgdata.inc perhaps some sort of symlink from current to 50.1.2 is expected here? Or do you think an override is appropriate here. I do wonder that this version was packaged in the past I suppose! Riccardo From rmottola at opencsw.org Tue Mar 27 11:53:08 2018 From: rmottola at opencsw.org (Riccardo Mottola) Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 11:53:08 +0200 Subject: issue with applying patch during build Message-ID: <8e7061ba-62fb-02db-caec-6517ecf3bd51@opencsw.org> Hi, while building the new gnustep-gui package, I have an issue: mgar hangs (on unstable9s): create mode 100755 travis-deps.sh Switched to a new branch 'csw' [extract-modulated] complete for gnustep-gui. ==> Applying patch work/solaris9-sparc/download/0001-solaris-9-does-not-have-floorf-replace-with-dbl-vers.patch it just waits there forever, I tried with a clean env, no help. if I cat work/solaris9-sparc/download/0001-solaris-9-does-not-have-floorf-replace-with-dbl-vers.patch The file is there and readable. The patch itself was generated with "mgar makepatch" so I hope it is created consistently Ideas? Riccardo