migrate OSQA to static

[Dagobert Michelsen]

Hi folks,

Am 28.01.2019 um 14:08 schrieb cgrzemba--- via maintainers <maintainers at lists.opencsw.org>:
> On 25.01.19 16:44, Maciej Bliziński <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 03:05:33PM +0100, cgrzemba--- via maintainers wrote:
>> > I completed the work from weekend started in Dublin and the results are here for review:
>> > 
>> > http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/~cgrzemba/osqa-static/
>> > 
>> > If there are no other concerns I would replace the Django OSQA with this static pages.
>> 
>> Well done! It will be good riddance.
>> 
>> The content is there, and URLs look the same (I didn't check all of them but
>> they look close enough). So I'd shut down the server-side execution as quickly
>> as possible. Then maybe do some more updates in the generated HTML files.
>> 
>> I'd put everything in the code repo: the source data, the scripts, and the
>> generated HTML.
>> 
>> Next up: get rid of Wordpress! :)
>> 
>> --Maciej
> 
> I made some improvements and replaced the OSQA URL with the static content.

Thanks a lot for pushing this! At the moment I don’t have my head free for this,
if you feel like it please go ahead with replacing Wordpress. Personally I refer this a lot:
  https://www.opencsw.org/extend-it/signup/to-upstream-maintainers/
and the filesearch and the package list.


Best regards

  — Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896