migrate OSQA to static

[cgrzemba at opencsw.org]

On 25.01.19 16:44, Maciej Bliziński  <maciej at opencsw.org> wrote: 
> 
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 03:05:33PM +0100, cgrzemba--- via maintainers wrote:
> > I completed the work from weekend started in Dublin and the results are here for review:
> > 
> > http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/~cgrzemba/osqa-static/
> > 
> > If there are no other concerns I would replace the Django OSQA with this static pages.
> 
> Well done! It will be good riddance.
> 
> The content is there, and URLs look the same (I didn't check all of them but
> they look close enough). So I'd shut down the server-side execution as quickly
> as possible. Then maybe do some more updates in the generated HTML files.
> 
> I'd put everything in the code repo: the source data, the scripts, and the
> generated HTML.
> 
> Next up: get rid of Wordpress! :)
> 
I am not sure if we should replace wp completely. There some pages which generated from dynamic content, like package list. So we should first define which content we want keep and which get rid of.

The alternative, we could easy update to WP version 5.2. but I have no experiance if it has an impact of performance.  <signatureafterquotedtext></signatureafterquotedtext>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20190513/c405bd13/attachment.html>