From jgoerzen at opencsw.org  Sat Nov 16 00:22:43 2024
From: jgoerzen at opencsw.org (Jake Goerzen)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 15:22:43 -0800
Subject: Initial commit: openssl-1.1.1w
Message-ID: <c34d53a4-8cb8-4996-962b-3c366491bb7b@opencsw.org>

Hello!

 ? I wanted to see what it would take to update OpenSSH to 9.9p1 and 
this requires at least openssl-1.1.1w.? So, I created a new pkg recipe 
for openssl 1.1.1w!? I used the current lts102 recipe as a template to 
create a new branch lts111.? This is the initial commit:

https://sourceforge.net/p/gar/code/HEAD/tree/csw/mgar/pkg/openssl1/branches/lts111/Makefile


highlights:

* switched to GNU compiler on all OS releases

* switched to OpenCSW perl instead of SUN perl

* patches have been removed from recipe, appears they have been 
integrated upstream already

* Solaris 11??? ALL tests PASS!

* Solaris 10??? ALL tests PASS!

* Solaris 9??????? One test fails:

../test/recipes/90-test_threads.t .................. Dubious, test 
returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/1 subtests


Still a work in progress but looks promising.

Regards,
-Jake


From dam at opencsw.org  Sat Nov 16 10:20:47 2024
From: dam at opencsw.org (Dagobert Michelsen)
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:20:47 +0100
Subject: Initial commit: openssl-1.1.1w
In-Reply-To: <c34d53a4-8cb8-4996-962b-3c366491bb7b@opencsw.org>
References: <c34d53a4-8cb8-4996-962b-3c366491bb7b@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <70A2ACDB-45D9-41E8-9511-88EC99D8405F@opencsw.org>

Hi Jake,

> Am 16.11.2024 um 00:22 schrieb Jake Goerzen via maintainers <maintainers at lists.opencsw.org>:
>   I wanted to see what it would take to update OpenSSH to 9.9p1 and this requires at least openssl-1.1.1w.  So, I created a new pkg recipe for openssl 1.1.1w!  I used the current lts102 recipe as a template to create a new branch lts111.  This is the initial commit:
> 
> https://sourceforge.net/p/gar/code/HEAD/tree/csw/mgar/pkg/openssl1/branches/lts111/Makefile
> 
> highlights:
> * switched to GNU compiler on all OS releases
> * switched to OpenCSW perl instead of SUN perl
> * patches have been removed from recipe, appears they have been integrated upstream already

> * Solaris 11    ALL tests PASS!
> * Solaris 10    ALL tests PASS!
> * Solaris 9        One test fails:
> 
> ../test/recipes/90-test_threads.t .................. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
> Failed 1/1 subtests

Excellent! I am excited to see how this progresses!


Best regards

  ? Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896


From ihsan at opencsw.org  Mon Nov 18 20:22:26 2024
From: ihsan at opencsw.org (Ihsan Dogan)
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:22:26 +0100
Subject: Initial commit: openssl-1.1.1w
In-Reply-To: <c34d53a4-8cb8-4996-962b-3c366491bb7b@opencsw.org>
References: <c34d53a4-8cb8-4996-962b-3c366491bb7b@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <9397B778-3F46-4B6E-B969-8D4250CBFD3D@opencsw.org>

Hello Jake

> Am 16.11.2024 um 00:22 schrieb Jake Goerzen via maintainers <maintainers at lists.opencsw.org>:
> 
>   I wanted to see what it would take to update OpenSSH to 9.9p1 and this requires at least openssl-1.1.1w.  So, I created a new pkg recipe for openssl 1.1.1w!  I used the current lts102 recipe as a template to create a new branch lts111.  This is the initial commit:
> 
> https://sourceforge.net/p/gar/code/HEAD/tree/csw/mgar/pkg/openssl1/branches/lts111/Makefile
> 
> 
> highlights:
> 
> * switched to GNU compiler on all OS releases
> 
> * switched to OpenCSW perl instead of SUN perl
> 
> * patches have been removed from recipe, appears they have been integrated upstream already
> 
> * Solaris 11    ALL tests PASS!
> 
> * Solaris 10    ALL tests PASS!
> 
> * Solaris 9        One test fails:
> 
> ../test/recipes/90-test_threads.t .................. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
> Failed 1/1 subtests
> 
> 
> Still a work in progress but looks promising.

Oh wow, this is really exciting. Thanks Jake.



Regards

Ihsan

From rmottola at opencsw.org  Tue Nov 19 12:37:20 2024
From: rmottola at opencsw.org (Riccardo Mottola)
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:37:20 +0100
Subject: Initial commit: openssl-1.1.1w
In-Reply-To: <c34d53a4-8cb8-4996-962b-3c366491bb7b@opencsw.org>
References: <c34d53a4-8cb8-4996-962b-3c366491bb7b@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <569151d8-6178-ca2e-fdbc-d13d960048ed@opencsw.org>

Hi!

very cool. You are having more success than me with TLS...

Jake Goerzen via maintainers wrote:
> * Solaris 11??? ALL tests PASS!
>
> * Solaris 10??? ALL tests PASS!
>
> * Solaris 9??????? One test fails:
>
> ../test/recipes/90-test_threads.t .................. Dubious, test 
> returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
> Failed 1/1 subtests 

is the solaris 9 repeatable? both intel and SPARC? I hope no strange 
threading issues that cause hangs.

Riccardo

From jgoerzen at opencsw.org  Tue Nov 19 20:59:03 2024
From: jgoerzen at opencsw.org (Jake Goerzen)
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 11:59:03 -0800
Subject: Initial commit: openssl-1.1.1w
In-Reply-To: <569151d8-6178-ca2e-fdbc-d13d960048ed@opencsw.org>
References: <c34d53a4-8cb8-4996-962b-3c366491bb7b@opencsw.org>
 <569151d8-6178-ca2e-fdbc-d13d960048ed@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <1db0fd4b-c80a-4c1f-9363-fa91ac617536@opencsw.org>


On 11/19/24 03:37, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> Hi!
>
> very cool. You are having more success than me with TLS...
>
> Jake Goerzen via maintainers wrote:
>> * Solaris 11??? ALL tests PASS!
>>
>> * Solaris 10??? ALL tests PASS!
>>
>> * Solaris 9??????? One test fails:
>>
>> ../test/recipes/90-test_threads.t .................. Dubious, test 
>> returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
>> Failed 1/1 subtests 
>
> is the solaris 9 repeatable? both intel and SPARC? I hope no strange 
> threading issues that cause hangs.
>
> Riccardo


Hi Riccardo,


 ?? I disabled threads on the Solaris 9 builds and now all tests pass 
100% for Solaris 9.? We'll have to investigate if threads can be 
re-enabled but for now here are some packages to test out. I've copied 
them into the experimental area (/home/experimental/jgoerzen).? It may 
take some time for the experimental catalog refresh to update.:

https://buildfarm.opencsw.org/experimental.html#jgoerzen


libssl1_1-1.1.1w,REV=2024.11.18-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
libssl1_1-1.1.1w,REV=2024.11.18-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libssl1_1-1.1.1w,REV=2024.11.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
libssl1_1-1.1.1w,REV=2024.11.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libssl_dev-1.1.1w,REV=2024.11.18-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
libssl_dev-1.1.1w,REV=2024.11.18-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
libssl_dev-1.1.1w,REV=2024.11.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
libssl_dev-1.1.1w,REV=2024.11.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
openssl_utils-1.1.1w,REV=2024.11.18-SunOS5.10-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
openssl_utils-1.1.1w,REV=2024.11.18-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
openssl_utils-1.1.1w,REV=2024.11.18-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
openssl_utils-1.1.1w,REV=2024.11.18-SunOS5.9-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz


Regards,

Jake
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.opencsw.org/pipermail/maintainers/attachments/20241119/954686cb/attachment-0001.html>

From jgoerzen at opencsw.org  Tue Nov 19 21:04:07 2024
From: jgoerzen at opencsw.org (Jake Goerzen)
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:04:07 -0800
Subject: Initial commit: openssl-1.1.1w
In-Reply-To: <70A2ACDB-45D9-41E8-9511-88EC99D8405F@opencsw.org>
References: <c34d53a4-8cb8-4996-962b-3c366491bb7b@opencsw.org>
 <70A2ACDB-45D9-41E8-9511-88EC99D8405F@opencsw.org>
Message-ID: <93a3c3b8-f737-4f3c-9d18-f712d98a3f24@opencsw.org>

Hi Dago,


On 11/16/24 01:20, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> Hi Jake,
>
>> Am 16.11.2024 um 00:22 schrieb Jake Goerzen via maintainers <maintainers at lists.opencsw.org>:
>>    I wanted to see what it would take to update OpenSSH to 9.9p1 and this requires at least openssl-1.1.1w.  So, I created a new pkg recipe for openssl 1.1.1w!  I used the current lts102 recipe as a template to create a new branch lts111.  This is the initial commit:
>>
>> https://sourceforge.net/p/gar/code/HEAD/tree/csw/mgar/pkg/openssl1/branches/lts111/Makefile
>>
>> highlights:
>> * switched to GNU compiler on all OS releases
>> * switched to OpenCSW perl instead of SUN perl
>> * patches have been removed from recipe, appears they have been integrated upstream already
>> * Solaris 11    ALL tests PASS!
>> * Solaris 10    ALL tests PASS!
>> * Solaris 9        One test fails:
>>
>> ../test/recipes/90-test_threads.t .................. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
>> Failed 1/1 subtests
> Excellent! I am excited to see how this progresses!
>
>
> Best regards
>
>    ? Dago
>

Currently I've set the SONAME (in the recipe) to be SONAME=1.1 
(following Debian example).? I'm wondering if this should be 
SONAME=1.1.1 instead?


Regards,

Jake